Skip to main content

What Does It Mean to Be Self-Actualized in the 21st Century?

New research links self-actualization to optimal creativity, well-being and self-transcendence

Credit:

Getty Images

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


“There is now emerging over the horizon a new conception of human sickness and of human health, a psychology that I find so thrilling and so full of wonderful possibilities...” –Abraham Maslow, Toward a Psychology of Being

On June 8, 1970, Abraham Maslow was writing furiously in his notebook by the pool at his home in Menlo Park, Calif. For the past few years he had been working intensely on a new theory linking self-actualization to self-transcendence and spirituality. Suddenly his stopwatch went off, reminding him to do his daily exercise (after a recent heart attack, he had been on strict doctor's orders to exercise daily to strengthen his heart). With annoyance at being disrupted, he threw down his notepad and started jogging by the side of the pool. His wife, Bertha, was lounging nearby, and she noticed that he was moving in an odd fashion. Just as she started to ask him whether he was all right, Maslow collapsed. By the time she ran to his side, Maslow was dead at the age of 62, with a treasure trove of ideas and theories left behind and unrealized.

Many people are familiar with Maslow's hierarchy of needs, in which he argued that basic needs such as safety, belonging and self-esteem must be satisfied (to a reasonable, healthy degree) before one can fully realize one's unique creative and humanitarian potential. What many people may not realize is that a strict hierarchy was not really the focus of his work (and in fact, he never represented his theory as a pyramid).


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Especially later in his life, Maslow's focus was much more on the paradoxical connections between self-actualization and self-transcendence and on the distinction between defense and growth motivation. Maslow's emphasis was less on a rigid hierarchy of needs and more on the notion that self-actualized people are motivated by health, growth, wholeness, integration, humanitarian purpose and the “real problems of life.”

As I explored Maslow's writings, I realized that the characteristics of self-actualizing people are even more relevant today than when they were first proposed nearly 70 years ago. It is clear that Maslow never conceptualized self-actualizing people as selfish or purely individualistic, despite such misrepresentation by some modern commenters. Instead. Instead Maslow became increasingly convinced that self-actualization is healthy self-realization on the path to self-transcendence.

We live in times of widening divides, selfish concerns and individualistic pursuits of power. I fear Maslow's conceptualization of self-actualization and the vision of humanity that was prevalent among the humanistic psychologists of the 1960s and 1970s has been lost in this generation.

To help bring back these seminal ideas and integrate them into modern theory and research on well-being and personality, I combed through Maslow's writings and put his characteristics of self-actualization to the scientific test.

The New “Characteristics of Self-Actualization” Scale

After sifting through Maslow's writings, I created an initial scale with 92 items spanning 17 characteristics of self-actualizing people. After rigorous testing, I found that 10 of Maslow's proposed characteristics of self-actualization stand up to scientific scrutiny. Not bad, considering his list was proposed nearly 70 years ago!* Without further ado, here are the 10 characteristics of self-actualization:

  • Continued freshness of appreciation (Example: “I can appreciate again and again, freshly and naively, the basic goods of life with awe, pleasure, wonder and even ecstasy, however stale these experiences may have become to others.”)

  • Acceptance (Example: “I accept all of my quirks and desires without shame or apology.”)

  • Authenticity (Example: “I can maintain my dignity and integrity even in environments and situations that are undignified.”)

  • Equanimity (Example: “I tend to take life's inevitable ups and downs with grace, acceptance and equanimity.”)

  • Purpose (Example: “I feel a great responsibility and duty to accomplish a particular mission in life.”)

  • Efficient perception of reality (Example: “I am always trying to get at the real truth about people and nature.”)

  • Humanitarianism (Example: “I have a genuine desire to help the human race.”)

  • Peak experiences (Example: “I often have experiences in which I feel new horizons and possibilities opening up for myself and others.”)

  • Good moral intuition (Example: “I can tell ‘deep down’ right away when I've done something wrong.”)

  • Creative spirit (Example: “I have a generally creative spirit that touches everything I do.”)

What interested me the most was the overall self-actualization factor. Any one of these characteristics viewed in isolation does not necessarily indicate a self-actualized person. But what do all these characteristics predict in the real world when they are viewed as a single unit?

Self-Actualization, Health and Growth

The humanistic psychologists of the 1950s and 1960s—including Alfred Adler, Charlotte Bühler, Viktor Frankl, Erich Fromm, Karen Horney, Sidney Jourard, Rollo May and Carl Rogers—were not focused on happiness or achievement (topics that receive so much attention in modern-day psychology and in self-help books). Instead they were interested in the determinants of health and growth. I found an overall pattern suggesting that the characteristics of self-actualization lead to optimal health and growth.

Overall, self-actualization was related to higher levels of stability and the ability to protect your highest-level goals from disruption by distracting impulses and thoughts. Self-actualization was related to lower levels of disruptive impulsivity (“get out of control,” “am self-destructive”), nonconstructive thinking (“have a dark outlook on the future,” “often express doubts”), and a lack of authenticity and meaning (“feel that my list lacks direction,” “act or feel in a way that does not fit me”).

Just as Maslow predicted, those with higher self-actualization scores were much more motivated by growth, exploration and love of humanity than by the fulfillment of deficiencies in basic needs. What's more, self-actualization scores were associated with multiple indicators of well-being, including greater life satisfaction, curiosity, self-acceptance, positive relationships, environmental mastery, personal growth, autonomy and purpose in life.

There were also links to work performance and creativity—self-actualization predicted greater work satisfaction and work performance, as well as greater reports of talent, skill and creative ability across a wide range of fields from the arts and sciences to business and sports. Interestingly, there was a significant (but small) correlation between self-actualization and humor ability, which Maslow predicted would be the case (he often viewed humor ability as one of the defining characteristics of self-actualization).

The relation between self-actualization and self-transcendence was also very interesting. I used a scale developed by David Yaden of Johns Hopkins University and his colleagues, which measures two aspects of self-transcendence: decreased self-salience and increased feelings of connectedness. Although self-actualization showed zero relation to decreased self-salience, it did show a strong positive correlation with increased feelings of oneness with the world.

This finding helps to reconcile a paradox that consumed Maslow in the last few years of his life: Why is it that the most self-actualized people are those who are the most self-transcendent? As he wrote in his 1961 paper “Peak Experiences as Acute Identity Experiences”:

“The goal of identity (self-actualization ...) seems to be simultaneously an end-goal in itself, and also a transitional goal, a rite of passage, a step along the path to the transcendence of identity. This is like saying its function is to erase itself. Put the other way around, if our goal is the Eastern one of ego-transcendence and obliteration, of leaving behind self-consciousness and self-observation, ... then it looks as if the best path to this goal for most people is via achieving identity, a strong real self, and via basic-need-gratification.”

Self-actualized people don't sacrifice their potentialities in the service of others; rather they use their full powers in the service of others (important distinction). You don't have to choose either self-actualization or self-transcendence—the combination of both is essential to living a full and meaningful existence.

For more on the details of the study, including more finely grained connections between self-actualization and the optimal functioning of a cybernetic, goal-directed system, as well as links with self-determination theory, read the full paper published in the January 2023 issue of the Journal of Humanistic Psychology. And don't forget to take the test!

*Maslow did get one thing very wrong: he believed that self-actualization was extremely rare in the population, and he argued that it was virtually unattainable among young people. I found that this isn't true. Self-actualization scores conformed to a normal distribution, much like IQ or height. What's more, self-actualization was not correlated with age, education, race, ethnicity, college GPA or childhood family income, and there were no gender differences found in self-actualization. Although there are certainly environmental barriers to self-actualization, with different environments helping to bring out the best or the worst in us, I found no evidence that the characteristics of self-actualization are limited to a particular swath of humanity.

Scott Barry Kaufman is a humanistic psychologist exploring the depths of human potential. He has taught courses on intelligence, creativity and well-being at Columbia University, N.Y.U., the University of Pennsylvania, and elsewhere. He hosts the Psychology Podcast and is author and/or editor of nine books, including Transcend: The New Science of Self-Actualization, Wired to Create: Unraveling the Mysteries of the Creative Mind (with Carolyn Gregoire), and Ungifted: Intelligence Redefined. Find out more at http://ScottBarryKaufman.com. In 2015 he was named one of "50 groundbreaking scientists who are changing the way we see the world" by Business Insider. He wrote the extremely popular Beautiful Minds blog for Scientific American for close to a decade. Follow him on X.

More by Scott Barry Kaufman