Skip to main content

U.S. cities breaking bad: why do these have the worst drug problems?

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


We all have favorite metropolises across the U.S., romantic or un-romantic notions of what certain cities hold in our mind’s eye: San Francisco for its bridges and climate, Detroit for its cars and manufacturing, New York for its theatre and art. But like unique landscape and culture, certain cities have come to harbor certain drug predilections. Why? Various reasons: history, chemical availability, ethnic population, and some we can’t even put our finger on, can’t quite identify. Here are some of the worst drugs of the trade and the cities that, strangely or not, covet them. Think you know why a city has picked its poison? Have a bit of wisdom? Tell me in the comment section below. I’ll explore these unique drug-city relationships over the next month as part of SciAm’s special city issue.

Baltimore, Maryland: heroin


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Missoula, Montana: methamphetamine

Washington, D.C.: cocaine

New Orleans, Louisiana: crack

San Francisco, California: heroin

About Cassie Rodenberg

I write, I listen, I research, I tell stories. Mostly just listen. I don't think we listen without judgment enough. I explore marginalized things we like to ignore. Addiction and mental illness is The White Noise behind many lives -- simply what Is. Peripherals: I write on culture, poverty, addiction and mental illness in New York City, recovering from stints as a chemist and interactive TV producer. During the day, I teach science in South Bronx public school.

More by Cassie Rodenberg