This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American
Here are my Science Seeker Editor's Selections for the past week:
"It was a quiet Thursday afternoon when 'A.S.', a 68-year-old woman from a suburb of Chicago, awakened from a nap to the realization that something was terribly wrong." It isn't the start to a mystery novel, but to a scientific paper. Jordan Gaines fills in the details: Sight without seeing: Bálint's syndrome
"This week's big autism story was a genetic test able to predict with 70% accuracy whether or not a child had autism," writes Jon Brock. And, of course, the predictable breakdown between science and science reporting. "A screening measure with 70% accuracy would only be slightly better than completely useless." Find out why.
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Here's a question you've always wanted to know the answer to, and thanks to Christian Jarrett at BPS Research Digest, you can now know the answer: What do children think of people who wear glasses?