Artwork at a science communication conference in many ways should be a no-brainer: visuals are often left as frills and afterthoughts in blog posts, books and articles. But a strong image can viscerally commubicate, educate and inspire. I'll write more about the impact all these artists and an art show had on ScienceOnline in coming days. For now, I've included some commentary that represents my own thinking about each piece, and what made these stand out.
Kalliopi Monoyios for Science Cover
Here we have the visualization process that takes place in science all shown in one image. Kalliopi simultaneously shows the nuts and bolts of creating an image from evidence, through the sketch to the refined head of Tiktaalik, and wove the mystery-animal-coming-into-focus story into the composition itself.
Alicia Hunsicker for Transfusion
Hunsicker gives is the branches of thought, the branching arteries and systems of the body and the botanical branches of the environment all together: Is the figure transfused with a sense of nature? Is a dead body transfusing nutrients to the forest? Mysterious and haunting - or joyful?- this painting asks us to ask questions.
Best able to convey complex ideas
Lynn Fellman for Crossing Beringia
The story of humans crossing the land-bridges from Asia to North American is one we can discover anew, through genetic comparison. Lynn Fellman combines maps, DNA sequences, a sense of prehistory's flow in the colours, and above all, a human face. These were people who made the journey, and Fellman prompts us to remember that while teasing out genetic clues to one of the greatest journeys of our species.
Perrin Ireland for Brain Atlas 4
Research notes that would've made da Vinci proud. Perrin Ireland's sketchnotes were a massively popular activity at the conference, and this example from her Brain Atlas project makes it easy to see why: science is communicated in accessible, energizing illustration and living text that compels you to read it. Reeeead it.
Best science art having to do with daily life
Nathaniel Gold for Anarchy
Nathaniel Gold, who regularly illustrates Eric Johnson's The Primate Diaries here on the Scientific American Blog Network, creates the ultimate in teenaged apathy and anger in this piece, Anarchy. The figure is in a casual posture, belying the shirt and title, and like a chimpanzee or an real teen, that mood can shift in an instant: the anarchy of being on the cusp of maturity.
Emily Damstra for Earthworm Dissection
Raise your hand if you've actually done one of these before. Emily Damstra makes the messy neat and the icky clinical in this sharp, realistic unlabelled scientific illustration. It's the complexity inside every worm seen on the way to work in the spring, every one on a hook. And Damstra made it beautiful.
After viewing and judging the astounding array of artistic astonishments, we decided to to create the Judges Special Awards, for works that really stood out but did not fit into the categories above. These winners will be receiving artwork from me, that I donated to the conference.
Judges Special Awards
Diana Marques for Chameleon
The detail is amazing, the chameleon is charming. Marques, along with Monoyios and Damstra above, are some of the heavy-hitting professional scientific illustrators who submitted to the contest, and this chameleon astounded me. I even kinda like the watermarks in the background, and I'm no fan of big watermarks.
Susan Ashley for Eclipse
Susan Ashley's submissions caught me off-guard. One of many people chosen for the gallery who was completely not on my radar before I saw her submissions, this one was created in part by using LED lights, which is something you don't see in a typical folksy assemblage.
Kaitlin Beckett for Pilotfish
I'm tempted just to say Kaitlin Beckett is one of my favourite living artists in any genre or capacity and leave it at that. But what makes Pilotfish stand out is the sinister charm of these coldly unethical bioengineers clearly bent to a purpose - a purpose that leads them to leave the water and take to the grim skies. I for one, bow to out Pilotfish overlords.
Will we do it again next year? Change a few things? I think the show overall came out well, and Karyn and I have already exchanged a flurry of emailed suggestions to make next years even more vital and exciting.
What do you think of the show, in person, online?
Did it suit the conference?
Are these your picks?
What's your favourite and why?