Skip to main content

Shale gas certification goes online in Appalachia

A new set of performance standards could inject a higher degree of safety and accountability into the fracking industry. The Center for Sustainable Shale Development (CSSD) has developed a set of 15 standards that oil and gas drillers can adopt in their operations (a PDF of the standards is here).

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


A new set of performance standards could inject a higher degree of safety and accountability into the fracking industry.

The Center for Sustainable Shale Development (CSSD) has developed a set of 15 standards that oil and gas drillers can adopt in their operations (a PDF of the standards is here). The standards cover both air and water issues related to hydraulic fracturing. One performance standard, for example, requires operators to recycle a minimum of 90 percent the flowback and produced water. Another performance standard limits flaring to 14 days over the lifetime of any development well.

The standards have been under development for some time and, as of this week, CSSD is taking applications from operators in Appalachia. CSSD’s performance standards are mandatory, and currently four companies will seek certification: Chevron, CONSOL Energy, EQT, and Shell.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Matt Watson of the Environmental Defense Fund, a collaborator of CSSD, notes in a blog post that the standards are not substitutes for regulation, but provide recognition for companies who go above and beyond the minimum – akin to LEED™ certification for buildings:

Strong rules and robust oversight is a nonnegotiable bottom line. But we like the idea of upping the ante. Why not have a program that recognizes companies for going beyond the regulatory minimums and doing more to protect communities and the environment? These companies are tough competitors – so let’s make environmental performance part of what they compete on.

Operators that elect to go for the CSSD standards will be subject to third-party verification and certification.

David Wogan is an engineer and policy researcher who writes about energy, technology, and policy.

David's academic and professional background includes a unique blend of technology and policy in the field of energy systems. Most recently, David worked at Austin Energy, a Texas municipal utility, implementing a Department of Energy stimulus grant related to energy efficiency. Previously, David was a member of the Energy & Climate Change team at the White House Council on Environmental Quality for the Obama Administration.

David holds two Master's degrees from The University of Texas at Austin in Mechanical Engineering and Public Affairs. While at UT, David was a researcher in the Webber Energy Group, where his research focused on advanced biofuel production to offset petroleum use in the transportation sector. David holds a Bachelor's of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin, where he researched nuclear non-proliferation measurement technology.

David is a 2013 Aspen Institute Journalism Scholar, joining a select group of journalists from Slate, ABC News, and The New York Times.

David lives in Austin, Texas. Follow along on Twitter or email him at david.wogan@me.com.

More by David Wogan