Skip to main content

Congress strips funding for efficient lighting standards

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


A bit of news from the end of last week. The U.S. Congress slipped in a provision to the omnibus spending package, passed last Friday, that strips funding for the Department of Energy to enforce a more efficient standard for light bulbs. The Los Angeles Times has a few notable quotes from our elected representatives:

”This is an early Christmas present for all Americans,” said Rep. Joe Barton (R-Texas). “It restores the freedom, at least temporarily, for you to choose the light bulbs you want to illuminate your home.”

That would be the same Joe Barton that apologized to Tony Hayward about the U.S.’s response to BP after the Gulf Oil spill. Representative Ted Poe, also of Texas, weighs in:


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“Since the federal government has taken the power to choose away from Americans, [consumers have been] flocking to their local Wal-Marts to hoard the last of the incandescent bulbs.”

Somehow, through the absurdity of American politics, incandescent light bulbs have attained the same fervor-inducing status as assault rifles and extended magazines.

The now defunct standards wouldn’t have eliminated the incandescent bulb – they would have only required bulbs to become 30% more efficient, meaning you could still have an incandescent bulb. Only it would be better than the one you can stockpile from your Wal-Mart today.

Lighting is a major source of energy consumption – both in homes and in businesses – so it makes sense to introduce more efficient lighting standards that would help many Americans save energy and money, either in their homes or their businesses.

Not to mention the time and money light bulb manufacturers have spent developing more efficient light bulbs or retooling manufacturing lines. Regulatory uncertainty like this costs people real money.

Looks like it will be up to utilities, local, and state governments to take the lead.

David Wogan is an engineer and policy researcher who writes about energy, technology, and policy.

David's academic and professional background includes a unique blend of technology and policy in the field of energy systems. Most recently, David worked at Austin Energy, a Texas municipal utility, implementing a Department of Energy stimulus grant related to energy efficiency. Previously, David was a member of the Energy & Climate Change team at the White House Council on Environmental Quality for the Obama Administration.

David holds two Master's degrees from The University of Texas at Austin in Mechanical Engineering and Public Affairs. While at UT, David was a researcher in the Webber Energy Group, where his research focused on advanced biofuel production to offset petroleum use in the transportation sector. David holds a Bachelor's of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin, where he researched nuclear non-proliferation measurement technology.

David is a 2013 Aspen Institute Journalism Scholar, joining a select group of journalists from Slate, ABC News, and The New York Times.

David lives in Austin, Texas. Follow along on Twitter or email him at david.wogan@me.com.

More by David Wogan