Skip to main content

Approaching "Wall-E" with Honda's Uni-Cub personal mobility device

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Honda's new mobility gadget has me worried.

Yesterday Honda announced a new invention called the Uni-Cub. It’s a cute, “Wall-E” inspired "personal mobility device" engineered to get people from here to there – all without walking. Great! Convenience! It’s a smaller Segway that one pops a squat on (not in that sense, at least not yet) and can be zipped around the office or down the street. With the Segway, one had to – gasp! – stand up while zipping around town looking silly. Not anymore. Now we’ll be able to cruise around large indoor malls, Costcos, and other warehouse shopping experiences from the comfort of our bums (while still looking silly).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=_Me1P0JljVk


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“Wall-E” is one of those movies that we’re going to look back on and think, “they were ahead of their time”. The 2008 Pixar film showed us a world not too far off in the future littered with the waste of hyper consumerism, so much so that Earth’s inhabitants left the planet to live in a space liner.

These inhabitants are familiar to us now, yet more sedentary than most of us. Instead of walking around the space liner like most of us would do now, or people did (will do?) in Star Trek – roaming the halls talking to the computer – people in "Wall-E" cruise around on recliners with flat screens while sipping Big Gulps and buying stuff. And they’re large. Very large.

Is that lifestyle really far off? Is it just fantasy?

We've been engineering walking out of our daily lives for a long time, from when we learned to ride horses to when the car was invented. Most of us spend most of our days sitting down, whether it’s in our cars, at our office, or on the couch at home. People stand still on the moving walkways in the airport.

In a series for Slate titled "The Crisis of Walking In America", Tom Vanderbilt goes in to great detail the anathema that is walking, including the revelation that folks in the United States walk the least of any industrialized nation:

The United States walks the least of any industrialized nation. Studies employing pedometers have found that where the average Australian takes 9,695 steps per day (just a few shy of the supposedly ideal “10,000 steps” plateau, itself the product, ironically, of a Japanese pedometer company’s campaign in the 1960s), the average Japanese 7,168, and the average Swiss 9,650, the average American manages only 5,117 steps. Where a child in Britain, according to one study, takes 12,000 to 16,000 steps per day, a similar U.S. study found a range between 11,000 and 13,000.

While we're walking less and less, we're getting fatter and fatter. According to a study by RAND, all forms of obesity in the United States have been increasing over the past two decades. That's not to say it's all to blame on walking less - there is junk food, high fructose corn syrup, carbohydrate heavy diets, etc - but it certainly plays a role.

Now, before y'all go berserk in the comments, I will concede that a Uni-Cub isn’t all bad news. It could be great for people who have trouble getting around or have injuries/disabilities. But for the vast majority of us who are able bodied, it probably does more harm than good in the long run. It strikes me as technology solving a problem we don’t have. Or worse, technology enabling or exacerbating a problem.

We already offload remembering things and talking to people to technology like Google and Facebook. I don't think we should do the same for walking.

David Wogan is an engineer and policy researcher who writes about energy, technology, and policy.

David's academic and professional background includes a unique blend of technology and policy in the field of energy systems. Most recently, David worked at Austin Energy, a Texas municipal utility, implementing a Department of Energy stimulus grant related to energy efficiency. Previously, David was a member of the Energy & Climate Change team at the White House Council on Environmental Quality for the Obama Administration.

David holds two Master's degrees from The University of Texas at Austin in Mechanical Engineering and Public Affairs. While at UT, David was a researcher in the Webber Energy Group, where his research focused on advanced biofuel production to offset petroleum use in the transportation sector. David holds a Bachelor's of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin, where he researched nuclear non-proliferation measurement technology.

David is a 2013 Aspen Institute Journalism Scholar, joining a select group of journalists from Slate, ABC News, and The New York Times.

David lives in Austin, Texas. Follow along on Twitter or email him at david.wogan@me.com.

More by David Wogan