Skip to main content

Dark Matter Could Become a Hypochondriac s New Nightmare

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


If you still worry about the millirems of radiation you get at the dentist’s office, you might soon have yet another reason to gobble down an Ambien at bedtime. A paper just posted to the arXiv physics preprint server outlines the amount of dark matter that all of us are exposed to on a regular basis.

Dark matter—the missing mass in the universe, estimated to make up 80 percent of the known there there—may collide with a “70 kg lump of meat made largely of oxygen, hydrogen, carbon and nitrogen,” as a post at Technology Review’s Physics arXiv blog put it—30 times a year for one plausible candidate for a dark matter particle and nearly once a minute for a more lightweight version.

The researchers don’t make any estimate of the health impact, which is contingent on the energy and motion of an oxygen or hydrogen nucleus—the most likely targets—after being broadsided by a shot of the dark. “It must surely represent a tiny risk per human but what are the implications for the population as a whole? That would be an interesting next step for a biological physicist with a little spare calculating time,” the blog post notes wryly.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


It’s a little early to reach for the pill bottle, actually, as the measurements of the spooky stuff are still a bit on the shaky side, to say the least. The estimates made in the paper by two physicists—Katherine Freese of the University of Michigan and Christopher Savage of Stockholm University—are based on a few experiments that have furnished suggestions of the prevalence of what are endearingly called WIMPs, Weakly Interacting Massive Particles.

But don’t sweat it, more research is needed. These experiments have not even actually found the dark substance, only “intriguing hints” of it. As the researchers themselves acknowledge, WIMPs could be supersymmetric particles, or Kaluza-Klein particles “motivated by theories with extra dimensions.” Not enough for the insurance actuaries to fire up the spreadsheets just yet.

Stay tuned to this channel for periodic health advisories.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gary Stix, the neuroscience and psychology editor for Scientific American, edits and reports on emerging advances that have propelled brain science to the forefront of the biological sciences. Stix has edited or written cover stories, feature articles and news on diverse topics, ranging from what happens in the brain when a person is immersed in thought to the impact of brain implant technology that alleviates mood disorders like depression. Before taking over the neuroscience beat, Stix, as Scientific American's special projects editor, oversaw the magazine's annual single-topic special issues, conceiving of and producing issues on Einstein, Darwin, climate change and nanotechnology. One special issue he edited on the topic of time in all of its manifestations won a National Magazine Award. Stix is the author with his wife Miriam Lacob of a technology primer called Who Gives a Gigabyte: A Survival Guide to the Technologically Perplexed.

More by Gary Stix