Skip to main content

Striking out on my own

This post is many months in coming, yet I know I will not be able to give it the kind of attention I would like. I am leaving Scientific American.  There is no mystery to the reasons.

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


This post is many months in coming, yet I know I will not be able to give it the kind of attention I would like.

I am leaving Scientific American.  There is no mystery to the reasons. SciAm hasn’t felt like the kind of space I’ve wanted to be a part of for quite some time, despite the continuing presence of several great writers and staff members. The backforum, which was at first raucous and fun, grew ever more quiet as our requests for better writing conditions (around the commenting system, transparency in decision-making, and more) languished.

I will say, though, that problems on this network and with Nature Publishing Group more generally are only part of my motivation to leave. I cannot keep up with four posts a month, particularly not at such low pay. I am starting to feel like I am contributing to an exploitative science writing environment to continue under these conditions – as I'm privileged enough to have a good full time job that pays my bills, I'm aware that also makes it easier for me to make this decision. Further, my tenure review committee is only mildly pleased – and mostly perplexed – with the writing time I have devoted to blogging over the years.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


In the next year, as I prepare to go up for tenure, I need to spend the majority of my writing time doing academic writing. I don’t like having to say this, because I believe science writing for a broad audience to have great value. Unfortunately, in my job, while its value is growing it is still low. I can point to the speaking engagements and three publications that have arisen from blogging and absolutely would not have happened otherwise. And there are more of both on the horizon because I write online. But the reality is that when you allocate time towards blogging, you necessarily allocate away from academic publishing. Unless you have a Time Turner, which I don’t.

So from now on, you can find me at www.kateclancy.com – all my archived blog posts from both Context and Variation blogs can be found there. You can still also find me on Twitter at @KateClancy, and on Facebook’s Context and Variation page. Look for a resurgence in my writing within a year, after I feel I have satisfied my tenure committee!

I will certainly blog in my new home, and with more frequency than you’ve seen me at SciAm for the last few months. However, my plan is to pitch the sorts of things I would have written as in-depth blog posts (such as explainers and those that take on current events or new scholarly papers) as actual science writing pieces to real news outlets. That way my science writing pieces aren’t written for free and messing up the balance of the science writing ecosystem, I am compensated for my time and effort, and I reach the appropriate audience.

See you at my new digs. I’m excited to make new memories and build a new audience there!

I am Dr. Kate Clancy, Assistant Professor of Anthropology at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. On top of being an academic, I am a mother, a wife, an athlete, a labor activist, a sister, and a daughter. My beautiful blog banner was made by Jacqueline Dillard. Context and variation together help us understand humans (and any other species) as complicated. But they also help to show us that biology is not immutable, that it does not define us from the moment of our birth. Rather, our environment pushes and pulls our genes into different reaction norms that help us predict behavior and physiology. But, as humans make our environments, we have the ability to change the very things that change us. We often have more control over our biology than we may think.

More by Kate Clancy