Skip to main content

On not overdiffusing flash in macro photography

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Earlier, I blogged about one of my flash diffusers, and about how most flash macro photography is improved by softening the flash's harsh artificial light. My observations were not novel, of course, and I love spying on the various contraptions macrophotographers invent as they aim for perfect diffusion. See, for example, recent posts by Seth Burgess and Ted MacRae.

The sparkle in this jumping spider's eye? That's uneven flash diffusion. A hotspot created by the right flash head sitting closer to the diffuser than the left provides some zing.

 


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


I'm now going to play the contrarian. For many images, the quest for ever softer, ever more even light leads to images that are ever so slightly more... dull. While we want enough diffusion to avoid blown-out highlights and completely black shadows, flattening the light too much can have a similar flattening effect on the image's personality. Thus, even when striving for clean, even lighting I often prefer one side brighter than the other, or, as for the spider above, just enough glint on the eyes to suggest a little mischief.

Smooth, but not too smooth: A Prolasius worker ant from Victoria, Australia.

 

 

Alex Wild is Curator of Entomology at the University of Texas at Austin, where he studies the evolutionary history of ants. In 2003 he founded a photography business as an aesthetic complement to his scientific work, and his natural history photographs appear in numerous museums, books and media outlets.

More by Alex Wild