ADVERTISEMENT
  About the SA Blog Network













The Thoughtful Animal

The Thoughtful Animal


Exploring the evolution and architecture of the mind
The Thoughtful Animal Home

Why Bronze Medalists Are Happier Than Silver Winners

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.


Email   PrintPrint



This blog appears in the In-Depth Report Science at the Sochi Olympics

So we have the paradox of a man shamed to death because he is only the second pugilist or the second oarsman in the world. That he is able to beat the whole population of the globe minus one is nothing; he has “pitted” himself to beat that one; and as long as he doesn’t do that nothing else counts.

In 1892, psychologist William James wrote these words in this foundational book, The Principles of Psychology.

James’s observation echoes a sentiment that is well known in psychology: a person’s achievements matter less than how that person subjectively perceives those achievements. For example, you might be thrilled over a 5% raise at work until you learn that your colleague down the hall earned a 10% raise. But is there ever a case when the individual with the 5% raise is happier with his or her outcome than the person with the 10% raise? Perhaps if Arthur only expected a 3% raise but received a 5% raise, while Emily expected a 15% raise but only received one worth 10%, then indeed Arthur would be more satisfied with his outcome, despite it being objectively lower than Emily’s outcome.

In the video above are the gold, silver, and bronze medalists at the medal ceremony for women’s moguls at the Vancouver 2010 Olympics. First, bronze medalist Shannon Bahrke, of the USA. Then, silver medalist Jennifer Heil of Canada. Finally, gold medalist Hannah Kearney, also of the USA.

In athletic competitions there are clear winners and losers. In the Olympics, the gold medalist won the competition; the silver medalist has a slightly lower achievement, and the bronze medalist a lower achievement still. One might expect that their happiness with their performance would mirror this order, with the gold medalist being happiest, followed by the silver medalists, and then the bronze. You might expect that Jennifer Heil, having won the silver medal, would be happier than Shannon Bahrke, so why does it appear as if Bahrke is so much more pleased with her bronze medal? Similarly, American gymnast McKayla Maroney (below), who took silver this year in London, looks positively displeased with her performance.

Psychologists Victoria Medvec and Thomas Gilovich of Cornell University, and Scott Madey of the University of Toledo think that this phenomenon can be explained by counterfactual thinking. This means that people compare their objective achievements to what “might have been.”

The most obvious counterfactual thought for the silver medalist might be to focus on almost winning gold. She would focus on the difference between coming in first place, and any other outcome. The bronze medalist, however, might focus their counterfactual thoughts downward towards fourth place. She would focus on almost not winning a medal at all. The categorical difference, between being a medalist and not winning a medal, does not exist for the comparison between first and second place.

It is because of this incongruous comparison that the bronze medalist, who is objectively worse off, would be more pleased with herself, and happier with her achievement, than the silver medalist.

To scientifically investigate this question, the researchers took video footage of the 1992 summer Olympics in Barcelona, Spain. Specifically, they recorded the medal ceremonies and showed them to undergraduate students, as well as footage from the athletic competitions immediately following announcements of the winners. They asked them to rate the happiness displayed by each of the medalists on a 10-point scale, with 1 being “agony” and 10 being “ecstasy.”

On average, the silver medalists scored a 4.8, and the bronze medalists scored a 7.1 immediately following the announcement. Later in the day, at the medal ceremony, the silver medalists scored a 4.3 on the happiness scale, while the bronze medalists scored 5.7. Statistical analyses proved that both immediately after winning, as well as later at the medal ceremony, bronze medalists were visibly happier than the silver medalists.

In 2006, psychologist David Matsumoto of San Francisco State University, together with Bob Willingham of The World of Judo magazine teamed up to see if this pattern would hold up when considering facial expressions following judo matches at the 2004 summer Olympics in Athens. They collected data from eighty-four athletes and thirty-five countries at three different times: immediately after their matches, when they received the medal, and when they posed on the podium.

Altogether, they found that thirteen of the fourteen gold medal winners smiled immediately after they completed their winning match, while eighteen of the twenty-six bronze medalists smiled. However, none of the silver medalists smiled immediately after their match ended. More interestingly, the facial expression that were recorded among silver medal winners ranged from sadness (43%) to contempt (14%) to nothing (29%). This means that it wasn’t just that the silver medal winners were less happy than gold medalists; instead, as Matsumoto and Willingham write, “those who displayed something displayed discrete, negative emotions.”

When it came to the medal ceremony and podium pose, however, silver medalists were more likely to smile. Indeed, 96.4% of the athletes displayed some sort of smile at this time. However, careful analysis of smile types indicated that the smiles displayed by the silver medalists were less genuine and more forced on both occassions than those of the gold and bronze medalists. In particular, both gold and bronze winners were more likely to display duchenne smiles, which scientists have described as particularly associated with positive emotions.

Taken together, the researchers concluded that “those who showed signs of genuinely enjoyable emotions at the end of the match were more likely to show those same signs of enjoyable emotions when they received the medal and posed on the podium. Conversely, those who did not display signs of enjoyable emotions at the end of the match were likely to not display such signs during the medal ceremonies, despite the fact that most athletes smiled.”

There may, indeed, be times when less really is more.

Medvec VH, Madey SF, & Gilovich T (1995). When less is more: counterfactual thinking and satisfaction among Olympic medalists. Journal of personality and social psychology, 69 (4), 603-10 PMID: 7473022

Matsumoto D, & Willingham B (2006). The thrill of victory and the agony of defeat: spontaneous expressions of medal winners of the 2004 Athens Olympic Games. Journal of personality and social psychology, 91 (3), 568-81 PMID: 16938038

Note: This revised and expanded post is based upon an earlier one that was originally posted at LAist on February 16, 2010.

Jason G. Goldman About the Author: Dr. Jason G. Goldman received his Ph.D. in Developmental Psychology at the University of Southern California, where he studied the evolutionary and developmental origins of the mind in humans and non-human animals. Jason is also an editor at ScienceSeeker and Editor of Open Lab 2010. He lives in Los Angeles, CA. Follow on . Follow on Twitter @jgold85.

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.





Rights & Permissions

Comments 9 Comments

Add Comment
  1. 1. sunnystrobe 11:03 am 08/9/2012

    In the case of winning silver, there remains, for socially competitive human animals, the eternal regret about the fact that ‘getting near enough still wasn’t good enough’; whereas for those winning bronze,
    getting near enough WAS good enough to belong to the top achievers!
    It’s plain and simple evolution-proven, alpha/beta/gamma
    ranking.

    Link to this
  2. 2. jtdwyer 1:33 pm 08/9/2012

    “To scientifically investigate this question, the researchers took video footage of the 1992 summer Olympics in Barcelona, Spain. Specifically, they recorded the medal ceremonies and showed them to undergraduate students, as well as footage from the athletic competitions immediately following announcements of the winners. They asked them to rate the happiness displayed…”

    Sorry, but is this supposed to represent a scientific study confirming expectations? I wonder if perhaps the “undergraduate [psychology?] students” were the actual subjects in this experiment? Perhaps their ratings were skewed by some extraneous condition?

    Perhaps a more scientific evaluation would have surveyed the medalists to rate their satisfaction level.

    Link to this
  3. 3. Jason G. Goldman in reply to Jason G. Goldman 1:45 pm 08/9/2012

    @jtdwyer: Your criticism is valid, but your alternative is not. Humans tend to be extraordinarily terrible at interrogating their own feelings. We would never ask someone “how good is your memory?” and expect an accurate answer; why would we expect accuracy for “how happy are you?” Some validation of the results from the 1992 Barcelona study comes from the 2004 Athens study mentioned in the article, which did not use observer ratings; instead, they used a standardized assessment of facial expression.

    Link to this
  4. 4. jtdwyer 2:31 pm 08/9/2012

    Jason G. Goldman – thanks, especially for pointing out that the 2004 Athens study used s standardized assessment of facial expression for evaluation. However, as a lay person, I have to wonder whether the cultural diversity of potential Olympic medalists might skew the results of the standardized assessment? Many studies (using student subjects) might not be calibrated for all cultures.

    Regarding the considering assessment of facial expressions following judo matches at the 2004 summer Olympics in Athens, I have to also point out that as I understand, immediately following the match determining medalists’ status, the gold and bronze medalists would have just won a match against an opponent. Only the silver medalist would have just lost a match against an opponent. Obviously, the silver medalists should be most disappointed immediately following their final match, since they were losers.

    Link to this
  5. 5. Jason G. Goldman in reply to Jason G. Goldman 2:38 pm 08/9/2012

    @jtdwyer: good point about the final win vs. final loss (i don’t know that much about judo). As far as cross-cultural, in the 2004 Athens study, they looked for differences among nations and found that the results held up pretty well… but I can’t speak to whether the assessment itself is biased.

    Link to this
  6. 6. jtdwyer 7:23 pm 08/9/2012

    I’m pretty sure the silver medalist as final loser effect occurs in boxing, wrestling and judo and I think it also affects pole vaulting, high jumping and long jumping, and perhaps the javelin, shot put and hammer throw field events as well. I don’t know about other individual elimination events such as marksmanship and archery, etc.

    Link to this
  7. 7. jtdwyer 6:14 pm 08/11/2012

    Well I don’t know how I could have overlooked so many other sports, but watch the award ceremony for women’s basketball I’m reminded that the ‘the silver medalist as final loser effect’ applies to most elimination events, from basketball to soccer to volleyball to… all of the many others I’m overlooking right now.

    Link to this
  8. 8. vinodkumarsehgal 10:11 pm 08/12/2012

    It can not be universally generalized that silver medalist may be less happy than bronze and gold medalists. Apart from individual factors, it will be dependent upon host of other factors viz cultural factors, past history, expectation level etc. I take a live example. In London 2012, US has bagged 104 medals but India with a population of 1210 millions has bagged only 6 medals — a poor poor meagre compared to US tally. Yet some silver medalist of India and the general populace may be more happy than some gold medalist of US. Reason? they never expected that they may be able to win even 6 medals.So their expectation level was low which is tied with the realities on the ground.

    Dynamics of happiness is intricately linked to dynamics of expectation level, satisfaction level.

    Link to this
  9. 9. kjetilk 1:58 am 02/8/2014

    I agree with other posters who say that this generalization is not valid. For example in the cross country skiing relay world cup at Lillehammer, Jessie Diggins of the US was going extremely well and at the top of the last hill only a fall could deprive the team of a silver. Then she crashed :( At the finish she was crying even though the bronze was the best achievement ever for the team.

    In fact, the women’s 4 x 5 km XC skiing relay I highly recommend. I note that US media doesn’t have any expectations for the relay, but I think it’s going to be an epic for the silver between the US, Sweden and Finland. If Norway doesn’t win, they will be unhappy, but I can say with confidence that the US team will be very happy if they win the silver. Thus invalidating the generalization.

    That said, it’s not surprising that it often the case but for a generalization to be valid, one has to look deeper.

    Link to this

Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.

More from Scientific American

Scientific American Dinosaurs

Get Total Access to our Digital Anthology

1,200 Articles

Order Now - Just $39! >

X

Email this Article

X