ADVERTISEMENT
  About the SA Blog Network













The Thoughtful Animal

The Thoughtful Animal


Exploring the evolution and architecture of the mind
The Thoughtful Animal Home

Human Superpowers: The Vision Revolution by Mark Changizi [Book Review]

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.


Email   PrintPrint



If Mark Changizi (web, blog, twitter, G+) is right, you don’t have to go see The Avengers in theaters to be impressed by superheroes and their super abilities. Instead, just consider the human eye. That’s right: your visual system contains superhuman powers! X-ray vision? No problem. Color telepathy? Sure. The ability to see into the future? That too. Oh, and communicating with the dead. Sort of. In his book The Vision Revolution, Changizi explains just how it is that you – yes, you – possess such extraordinary capabilities.

Using these four human superpowers as a hook, Changizi brings an evolutionary perspective to several of the most fundamental questions facing vision scientists today. For example, if color and people are both so central to our experience of the world, why do so few languages have color terms explicitly for skin colors? Why do humans have forward facing eyes? (You might think you know the answer to this one, but Changizi has a very different explanation.) How is it that most of us learn to read with relative ease, if reading itself is so new in evolutionary terms that our brains could not have evolved specialized reading mechanisms? (Hint: letters are designed such that they take advantage of our brain’s inherent systems for recognizing objects.)

And why do we so easily fall for visual illusions? Why do visual illusions persist even after we know that our eyes are fooling us? In what is perhaps the greatest triumph of this book, Changizi describes a sort of “periodic table” of visual illusions, which systematically explains why visual illusions don’t represent failures of the visual system, but are rather side-effects of several features built into it.

Why don't the vertical lines appear straight? In The Vision Revolution, Changizi explains this reason for this, and many other, illusions.

In answering these questions, Changizi combines evidence from comparative psychology, cognitive neuroscience, anthropology, and linguistics in order to lay out a theoretical perspective for the evolution of the human visual system that could potentially revise much of what we think we know about human vision. While some of his ideas are quite radical (by conventional vision science standards), and many are speculative, I found them generally compelling. Despite the sometimes speculative nature of the ideas, each of them are carefully described, each with a set of empirically testable predictions.

While an important read for vision scientists, it is also extremely accessible to the non-expert reader. Throughout the text, Changizi uses lots of clear, jargon-free examples and do-it-yourself exercises so that you can experience exactly the kinds of visual and cognitive phenomena that he describes. In fact, this book would do well in an undergraduate sensation and perception course. It is refreshing to see a theoretical vision science book take such a broad, sweeping view of visual cognition.

The Vision Revolution is available in paperback at Amazon.com and is also available on the Kindle.

See also:
Review of The Vision Revolution in Scientific American MIND by Melinda Wenner

Disclaimer: I received this book as a personal gift from Mark Changizi; this review is entirely unsolicited.

Jason G. Goldman About the Author: Dr. Jason G. Goldman received his Ph.D. in Developmental Psychology at the University of Southern California, where he studied the evolutionary and developmental origins of the mind in humans and non-human animals. Jason is also an editor at ScienceSeeker and Editor of Open Lab 2010. He lives in Los Angeles, CA. Follow on . Follow on Twitter @jgold85.

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.





Rights & Permissions

Comments 1 Comment

Add Comment
  1. 1. Johnay 3:04 pm 05/8/2012

    From the review in SA Mind: “Changizi’s theories are appealing and logical, and he backs them with good circumstantial evidence; however, as with any evolutionary theorizing, the ideas are also nearly impossible to prove correct—or incorrect.”

    From this review: “Despite the sometimes speculative nature of the ideas, each of them are carefully described, each with a set of empirically testable predictions.”

    So what testable predictions did Goldman see that Wenner did not?

    Link to this

Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.

More from Scientific American

Scientific American Special Universe

Get the latest Special Collector's edition

Secrets of the Universe: Past, Present, Future

Order Now >

X

Email this Article

X