December 25, 2011 | 9
According to holiday lore, poor Rudolph was a victim of social exclusion because he was different from the rest of the reindeer. In a move that was lucky for nice (but not naughty) children everywhere, he was then approached by Santa, who asked him to guide the sleigh. Thereafter, according to traditional sources, all the reindeer loved him.
Like most bits of religious lore, however, the Rudolph story is rife with scientific errors. For one thing, it takes more than special attention by an authority figure for bullies to stop picking on those whom they perceive to be different – in fact, this often only serves to further isolate those who are victimized by bullying. But a bigger problem with the story is that reindeer – like most non-domesticated animals – are exceedingly unlikely to stick around long enough when a human approaches to have time to consider an offer like guiding a sleigh.
While cross-country skiing has been a human pastime in Norway and elsewhere for centuries, the activity has seen a recent increase in the last fifty years, owing to the continued construction of mountain cabins and ski lodges, and improved access to alpine areas due to the development of road and trail systems. With the increase in skiing also comes an increase in other snow activities, such as snowmobiling. In 2002, for example, there were 49,260 snowmobiles in operation in Norway.
This could be problematic for the 30,000 to 40,000 reindeer inhabiting the twenty-six defined “management areas” in Norway. During the harsh winter, reindeer typically reduce their activity and rely on a combination of stored fat and limited, nutrient-poor foods such as lichens in order to survive. The increasing human presence in reindeer habitats, therefore, could force the reindeer to use more energy than is optimal as they attempt to avoid human interaction. This could also reduce the time that reindeer can spend grazing. Taken together, human encroachment could have the compound effect of reducing the body weight of reindeer, and for females, their conception rate and age of first reproduction.
In an effort to understand how increasing tourism in remote parts of Norway could affect wild reindeer populations, researchers from the University of Norway compared the behavioral responses of reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus) to humans on skis and to snowmobiles, in Setesdal-Ryfylke, in southern Norway (area 1 on the map, above right, click to enlarge).
Since the 1990s, the winter population in the study area has been stable at about 3000 reindeer, with approximately 800 calves born each year. On average, this comes out to one reindeer for every two square kilometers. Part of the reason for choosing this study area was the lack of large predators – this helps to ensure that reindeer responses to approaching skiers or snowmobiles aren’t affected by other nearby threats.
In order to collect their data, an observer approached a reindeer herd at a constant speed (4 km/hr for skiers, and 20 km/her for snowmobiles) until they had reached the original location of the herd.
For each incident, they recorded nine variables: the provocation method (ski or snowmobile), weather (sunny, cloudy, raining, snowing, foggy), wind speed, topography (level or hilly), activity of the reindeer prior to provocation (lying, foraging, moving, or a combination), herd size, herd composition, wind direction (relative to the reindeer), and the original position of the observer (relative to the reindeer).
In addition, they measured seven response variables:
- (1) Start distance: distance between observer and the estimated center point of the herd at the beginning of the provocation.
- (2) Sight distance: distance between the observer and the herd center point when more than 1 reindeer looked up in the observer direction.
- (3) Fright distance: distance between the observer and the herd center point when the herd exhibited a fright response by grouping together.
- (4) Flight distance: distance between the observer and the herd at the moment of flight.
- (5) Escape distance: air distance from where reindeer took flight to where they resumed more relaxed behavior (i.e., grazing or lying).
- (6) Total flight: air distance covered if the herd moved farther away from the observer after resuming more relaxed behavior the first time, and we determined that the movement was caused by the provocation.
- (7) Total distance moved: total flight distance measured by total ground distance covered. The air and ground distance are equal if the reindeer escape in the same direction upon provocation. Any directional change during escape makes the ground distance longer.
In order to collect enough data, they repeated this each winter for three years.
The results were straightforward. Reindeer movement distances varied between 134 and 2,526 meters, with an average distance of 600 meters for snowmobiles and 970 meters for skiers. Compared to disturbances by skiers, reindeer became aware of snowmobiles (“sight distance”) at longer distances. However, their physical displacement was shorter for snowmobiles than for skiers (“total flight” and “total distance”). The researchers conclude that “reindeer were more easily disturbed by snowmobiles, but reacted stronger when provoked by skiers.”
Additional analyses indicated that “fright distance” was larger when approached from downhill than from uphill, and “escape distance” was farther when they had been lying rather than grazing.
It’s possible that the reindeer were able to notice the snowmobiles sooner due to the noise from their motors or the flashing from the headlights. Even still, skiers seem to disturb them more than snowmobiles, which is perhaps surprising. The researchers hypothesize that this could be due to confusing skiers for hunters. They write, “hunting is not allowed from motorized vehicles in Norway, and chasing and harassing wildlife is strictly forbidden. However, reindeer are hunted by humans on foot and probably do not discriminate between a hunter and a tourist.”
It should also be noted that these responses probably represent something like a maximum response to approaching skiers or snowmobiles for these reindeer, because the researchers always directly approached the center of the herd. In natural interactions, however, it is more likely for reindeer to be approached obliquely rather than directly.
What does all this mean for regulating the tourism industry in places such as Norway with wild reindeer? Wild reindeer in Norweigian mountains don’t generally have more than three human encounters per day during the busiest tourist seasons. By combining this with the data from their experiment, the researchers calculated that reindeer would add approximately 3.4% to their daily energy expenditure for three skier encounters, and 2.3% more for three snowmobile encounters. They note that this extra energy expenditure should be easily compensated for, as long as these encounters are limited to the 2-4 week-long tourist season.
This is good news, though the work is far from over: it is still possible that loss of access to optimal habitats due to avoidance of areas frequented by humans, combined with subsequent overgrazing of undisturbed habitats could still have negative implications for the health of reindeer herds.
The other caveat is that these numbers hold only as long as snow levels remain constant. This is because deeper snow makes moving through it more effortful, meaning that more energy would be expended by reindeer in flight from approaching humans. It is not clear how climate change could enter into this process: it is possible that increased snowfall due to climate change could make it impossible for reindeer to compensate for even three encounters per day with humans.
When most animals are approached by an unfamiliar other, they engage a stress response known colloquially as “fight or flight.” That is, the approach of a potential threat is alarming enough to the animal that it will retreat from the approaching human – when possible – or perhaps react with aggression. Santa never stood a chance when offering the sleigh to Rudolph.
Reimers, E., Eftestol, S., & Colman, J. (2003). Behavior Responses of Wild Reindeer to Direct Provocation by a Snowmobile or Skier The Journal of Wildlife Management, 67 (4) DOI: 10.2307/3802681
Reindeer photo, from a Beverly Hills storefront, copyright the author.
12 Digital Issues + 4 Years of Archive Access just $19.99X