ADVERTISEMENT
  About the SA Blog Network













The Curious Wavefunction

The Curious Wavefunction


Musings on chemistry and the history and philosophy of science
The Curious Wavefunction Home

Outstanding Verizon ad admonishes parents to not squelch their daughters’ interest in science

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.


Email   PrintPrint



At a time when we are still seeing subtle and not-so-subtle opposition to fostering young girls’ interest in STEM disciplines and to women’s mobility in professional science, it’s encouraging to see this ad from Verizon asking parents to not squelch their daughters’ natural curiosity. Take a look at it.

The ad follows a narrative that might be depressingly familiar to female scientists; well-meaning parents (or teachers) tell their daughter not to waste too much time on a school science project, well-meaning parents tell their daughter not to get her clothes dirty poking around in a stream, well-meaning parents tell their daughter not to handle a drilling tool because it’s too dangerous (and then ask her to hand it to her brother). The ad ends with the girl choosing lipstick over participation in a school science fair.

What’s striking to me is how subtle and supposedly well-meaning the parents’ actions are. But the result is a gradual erosion of natural curiosity; it’s the death of curiosity by a thousand benevolent cuts. The reason the ad resonated with me is that, in spite of being a man, I could actually identify very similar situations from my own childhood where my parents could have potentially discouraged my curiosity but instead chose to channel my interest in science. When I started bringing beetles and other bugs home my mother, instead of asking me to throw them out and looking disgusted, lent me her jam jars to house them and study their life cycle. When I started keeping bread out in the open to observe the growing mold – and at one point even brought home some mold growing on dog poop – my parents did not scold me or recoil but instead bought me a microscope and encouraged other, more constructive ways to indulge my interest in microscopic life forms. When I tried to perform a potentially dangerous experiment to electrolyze saline solution and isolate sodium (in the intellectual tradition of Humphry Davy), my dad bought me an electronics set that could achieve the same goal with lower voltages. My parents turned almost every opportunity they could find to potentially criticize or scold me into constructive endeavors instead.

And then there were all the books. When my dad found out I was interested in microbiology he pointed me to Paul DeKruif’s famous book “Microbe Hunters” that charted the heroic efforts of scientists like Pasteur and Koch in defeating disease. Even at a young age he made his extensive collection of science books available to me, some of which dealt with aspects of human anatomy that might have been considered by other parents to be a little too, well, “advanced” for such a young boy. Those books in turn led to my interest in biomedical research, an interest that led me on to the professional path which I currently tread on. A similar attitude by her parents led my wife to pursue a graduate degree in computer science at MIT; from what she recalls, her parents treated her and her brother’s curiosity about mechanical gadgets in exactly the same way.

The result of my parents’ behavior was that I could let my intellectual curiosity roam wherever I wanted it to, but the key point is that I did not possess some special inborn scientific capability that was just waiting to be set free. Instead my curiosity was as natural as that of the girl in the video. Children are natural scientists who simply want to find out more about the world. I wanted to catch beetles when I saw them and I wanted to try to repeat experiments by great scientists when I read about them. But unlike the parents in that Verizon video, mine did not worry that I would bring home dirt or disease or blow up stuff. Instead they realized that this was the best possible way to let me learn science by myself, and they nonchalantly nurtured or at least tolerated this interest and led it in productive directions. Hopefully parents and teachers will take a look at that ad and consider doing the same for their kids, and especially for their daughters who already have the deck stacked against them by traditions and culture.

Ashutosh Jogalekar About the Author: Ashutosh (Ash) Jogalekar is a chemist interested in the history and philosophy of science. He considers science to be a seamless and all-encompassing part of the human experience. Follow on Twitter @curiouswavefn.

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.





Rights & Permissions

Comments 6 Comments

Add Comment
  1. 1. CurvyRedHead 6:43 am 06/13/2014

    Keep the faith Ash! Some societal changes take longer than others. It’ll happen.

    Link to this
  2. 2. robert.bright20 8:42 am 06/13/2014

    Well said Ash – and Verizon!
    I have three Godchildren, the two elder being boys and the youngest a girl. I regularly took them out when they were young children to the river and to country places. The young girl joined in everything, with my encouragement. I called her “My little commando” as she scrambled up and down banks and went pond dipping with the boys. I had spare cloths at home and the drill was that when they got back, they changed, cleaned up and their cloths went into my washing machine. Mess expected!

    More recently I have taken the girl and her friends along our river, bearing nets and jars! I have some of their ‘tiddlers’ in an aquarium, kept for them to watch. I also copied information for them about the fish from the net, or scanned from books.

    The girls have also wanted to help when I have been cooking for them and my Goddaughter’s mother, and I have encouraged them to experiment a bit (under guidance – we want to be able to eat the end product).

    I grew up (admittedly as a boy) spending spare time on a local farm with the farmer, (who incidentally had lost a leg at the Battle of the Somme), I had plenty of time to get messy helping him, as well as in exploring ponds and streams on his farm, plus a medieval archaelogical site (with moats!). I went on to get a chemistry degree and work in the water industry.

    The experiences that I had growing up should be available to all. All youngsters are inquisitive, regardless of gender. Encourage them, guide them, DON’T discourage because the youngster is a girl!

    Link to this
  3. 3. curiouswavefunction 11:23 am 06/13/2014

    robert.bright20: I love what you are doing for your Godchildren, good for them! I think that by now there is an overwhelming amount of evidence that both boys and girls can be equally good at science if their curiosity is indulged in the same way at an early age. You are clearly doing all the right things in this regard, so thank you.

    CurvyRedHead: Indeed, I think the change is real, even if disappointingly slow. Hopefully we can all do our part.

    Link to this
  4. 4. DrKrishnaKumariChalla 10:29 pm 06/13/2014

    Lucky to have parents that encouraged and supported me since my childhood. I am what I am now because of them. If only all the girls in the world have parents like mine!
    Nice thought-provoking article. Loved it.

    Link to this
  5. 5. Shecky R 6:15 am 06/14/2014

    I’m no Verizon fan, but do love the ad and praise them for doing it… still, the cynic in me says they probably ran it by a dozen marketing/PR/research/psychology teams first to see if it would enhance their image and goodwill, and on that basis placed it; self-interest being the ultimate motivation for large corporations. Perhaps the ad shows some commitment to females in STEM… or, just as likely, it’s just an advertising ploy.

    Link to this
  6. 6. Arbeiter 11:07 am 06/16/2014

    1) No eye protection, 2) Long hair flopped onto drill, 3) loose clothing, 4) Unsecured workpiece, 5) Clutter on workbench. She presses the trigger, the motor sucks her air in and swats the drill into her face, taking out an eye. A social advocate screams “EQUAL OPPORTUNITY LAWSUIT!”

    Boys end up bloodied and scarred for doing stupid things while they learn how the world works: catching a ball to driving a screw to beating the crap out of each other to establish rank. Playing with dolls won’t get you there. “Learning on the job” can be lethal.

    http://www.wired.com/2012/07/sangji-chemistry-death-ucla/
    Do NOT give babies razor blades. Do not wear teased hair, dangling jewelry, a fuzzy sweater…in the lab. The universe wants you dead. Don’t give it the satisfaction.

    Link to this

Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.

More from Scientific American

Scientific American Holiday Sale

Give a Gift &
Get a Gift - Free!

Give a 1 year subscription as low as $14.99

Subscribe Now! >

X

Email this Article

X