Skip to main content

Do Our Descendants Have the Right to Spy On Us?

Do our unborn descendants have a right to spy on our day-to-day activities? There’s little doubt they will look through our digital archive, minus some terrible technological disaster.

This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American


Do our unborn descendants have a right to spy on our day-to-day activities? There's little doubt they will look through our digital archive, minus some terrible technological disaster. How about watching us from weeds at the little corners of the street, from holes in the cement, from our eavestroughs?

Jonathon Keats is at it again.

Keats has asked citizens of Berlin to hide and keep secret 100 ultra-long exposure cameras. For 100 years.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


"The first people to see these photos will be children who haven't yet been conceived," says Mr. Keats. "They're impacted by every decision we make, but they're powerless. If anyone has the right to spy on us, it's our descendants."

From the press release:

To facilitate intergenerational surveillance in Berlin and other yet-to-be-disclosed cities, Mr. Keats has invented a new photographic system based on the traditional pinhole camera. "My photographic time capsules are extremely simple, since anything complicated is liable to break," says Mr. Keats. The cameras use sheets of black paper in place of ordinary film. The pinhole focuses light on the black paper sheet, such that the paper fades most where the light is brightest, very slowly creating a unique positive image of the scene in front of the camera. "The photograph not only shows a location, but also shows how the place changes over time," Mr. Keats explains. "For instance an old apartment building torn down after a quarter century will show up only faintly, as if it were a ghost haunting the skyscraper that replaces it."

Keats work with Surveillance for the Unborn calls into question our increasingly monitored lives, and how far it will go. Will we spy on our descendants? And are we willingly complicit? Beyond feeding Facebook to track our own lives, we've entered into a world of tracking our health with wearables. Is spying okay when Big Brother is all of us? So are the people who plunk down 10€ to lease one of Keats' cameras thinking about invasiveness with a different mindset than they would have a generation ago?

The first person to purchase one at the gallery, was an 11 year old boy.

Links