About the SA Blog Network

Science Sushi

Science Sushi

Real science. Served raw.
Science Sushi Home

September’s Scishimi: Musings on menstrual blood and spraying sperm.

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

Email   PrintPrint

Christie Wilcox About the Author: Christie Wilcox is a science writer and blogger who moonlights as a PhD student in Cell and Molecular Biology at the University of Hawaii. Follow on Google+. Follow on Twitter @NerdyChristie.

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

Rights & Permissions

Comments 2 Comments

Add Comment
  1. 1. Adrian Morgan 8:52 pm 10/6/2011

    When I did the colour vision test, I scored a perfect zero (which translates to 100% in the inverted scoring system they use). For what it’s worth, I’m 34 years old.

    This is good, but no doubt I got lucky and my accuracy comes with error bars. I’m not doing the test again, because I’m content not knowing what they are. Zero is good enough for me.


    Link to this
  2. 2. Tomsing 3:29 pm 10/7/2011

    On the color test, I’m a bit disappointed that I don’t at least get a bell curve that tells me where I stand. All I get is a best score and a worst score.

    The science center article is interesting – I’ve been talking about doing a double date with my wife and another couple, but our local science center closes at 5:00 every day, except for sporadic evening events. I think something aimed at young, nerdy adults would do well. Have theme nights based around various scientific fields – solve a problem to get a drink, and the faster you solve it, the cheaper your drink is (make sure the answer is covered in an exhibit near the bar). Get lecturers to give interactive talks, like a live action Discovery channel. Have a Christie Wilcox-inspired Mythbusting night, where you see why everything you learned in school was wrong. Hell, have a Mythbusters-Busting night, where you see why everything they do on Mythbusters was wrong! I could see people getting excited about stuff like this!

    Link to this

Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a member to submit a comment.

More from Scientific American

Email this Article