The Good, Bad, and Weird in Physiology and Neuroscience
The Scicurious Brain Home

# Ignobel prize winner in Physics: The amazing ponytail

This year’s Ignobel prize in physics goes to two separate research groups, one of whom also received a backdated Ignobel prize for a previous study*! Two Ignobels in one lifetime! Famous? Or Infamous?

Girls, and long-haired guys, haven’t we been there? You’re jogging along, and the next thing you know your ponytail is tick-tocking along behind you. Or in my case, whipping back and forth and then sticking to my sweaty back (We all know the romantic image of a pretty jogging girl with a swinging ponytail, but of course they leave out the part where she sweats). Sure, no one expects their ponytail to stay still, precisely, but when you’re moving up and down and forward…why is it moving side to side?

For this, we need some physicists.

“Shape of a Ponytail and the Statistical Physics of Hair Fiber Bundles.” Raymond E. Goldstein, Patrick B. Warren, and Robin C. Ball, Physical Review Letters, vol. 198, no. 7, 2012.

“Ponytail Motion,” Joseph B. Keller, SIAM [Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics] Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 70, no. 7, 2010, pp. 2667–72

(Source)

It all started with Joseph Keller. He used to go jogging around the Stanford campus, and was struck by all the women jogging around as well. In particular he was struck by their lovely, bouncing…ponytails. Why DID the ponytails swing from side to side like that? Being a physicist, he set out to understand why.

To look at this in theory, he compared the ponytail to a pendulum. He looked at both a stiff pendulum and a more flexible string (of more than 10 inches), bounced it up and down, and did some math. It turns out that the motions of both the pendulum and the string satisfy the Hill equation, which refers to oscillations in a solution. Air still counts as a solution. And when you work out the math, the Hill equation predicts that the natural frequency of the pendulum (the ponytail) will grow over time, causing the ponytail to swing from side to side even though the head is only going up and down. This is particularly true when the ponytail frequency is HALF of the jogging frequency, which it generally is.

You’d think then that if you just ran faster, you’d make the jogging frequency too quick, but in fact that’s not true. When people run faster their feet generally don’t MOVE faster, instead their steps lengthen. So the ponytail frequency remains close to half the jogging frequency, and the ponytail is doomed to swing.

Of course, this is looking at the ponytail as a single pendulum unit, as a string. In reality, a ponytail is a whole pile of strings. Up to 100,000 strings, to be exact.

(It should be noted that the prize winners brought a sample ponytail with them to the ceremony, of real human hair. None of the winners themselves were in possession of their own ponytail.)

This is where the second group honored with the Ignobel, Goldstein et al, took up the research. The question is now, how do the individual fibers make up the shape of the ponytail? They were looking for the balance of forces in each area of the ponytail, and came up with three major forces: the unit weight per length, which will be affected by gravity and pull their hair down, the stiffness of each hair, and the random curvatures in the hair.

You see, even hair that seems pin straight isn’t really, each hair will have tiny curvatures. These give the ponytail its “fluff” and springyness, and cause it to take the triangular shape at the bottom. All this doesn’t too much impact the swingyness of the ponytail while running, because the ponytail will still act, as a whole, like a pendulum.

All that from watching students jogging around campus!

*Joseph Keller took home his second Ignobel for the theory of why teapots drip and how to make them stop. It was originally awarded in 1999 and he was accidentally left off the prize. Keller now basks in the award of the theory of the teapot, and tea drinkers everywhere rejoice over the invention of those little spigots that stop the teapot from dripping. Brilliant.

About the Author: Scicurious is a PhD in Physiology, and is currently a postdoc in biomedical research. She loves the brain. And so should you. Follow on Twitter @Scicurious.

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

 Previous: IgNobel Prize Winner in Fluid Dynamics: ARGH! I spilled my coffee in the hall again! MoreThe Scicurious Brain Next: Ignobel prize in Medicine: beware the exploding colon

Rights & Permissions

1. 1. jctyler 6:49 am 10/2/2012

Have you wondered about the similarity of the physics in ponytail swinging and coffee spilling?

Consider this:

Both the ponytail and the coffee swing sideways. Now,

at a certain rythm your ponytail goes out of sync, its motion goes from smooth to flopping.

At a certain rythm the coffee in the cup goes out of sync, its motion goes from smooth to spilling.

Nice weather this morning, I think I’ll have another one.

2. 2. CherryBombSim 6:37 pm 10/4/2012

I think you meant that the amplitude of the swinging will increase rather than the frequency. Probably just a misstatement rather than a misunderstanding, since you go on to say that the ponytail frequency is roughly half of the jogging frequency, which would not stay true if it were increasing.

3. 3. voyager 7:33 pm 10/4/2012

Listen, that coy mention of ponytails being the one bouncing thing among other bouncing things that Joseph Keller noticed on running women–even the most cursory appraisal of the relative complexity of motion and therefore the scientific interest of the other bouncing phenomena conduces to a non-scientist’s suggestion, amounting to a plea, of where future research in the field might lie.

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.