This article was published in Scientific American’s former blog network and reflects the views of the author, not necessarily those of Scientific American
Fracking actually got the treatment several months ago as people started worrying their sinks might ignite from methane contamination, but I just saw it this week. It does a decent job of summarizing the general idea behind fracking (pump a bunch of fluids underground to crack rock, extract natural gas) and why people are concerned/opposed/scared about its possible effect on groundwater (your sink might ignite, no biggie).
In light of the new report out of UT Austin’s Energy Institute, it would be good a new animation with an update from the science community that groundwater contamination may not be a direct result of fracking and related fluids, but possibly from spilling fluids above ground. I'm not sure these fracking videos are anywhere near as viral as say this hilarious Rick Perry treatment, but making sure up-to-date (and accurate!) scientific information is available to the public is as important as the science.
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
While we're on it, an updated animation might as well have the exaggerated reactions of the pro natural gas/fracking camp and its opponents similar to this brilliant animation of Canada withdrawing from the Kyoto protocol. It wouldn't be that far off the mark, right?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=gN5gTcbGPA4