About the SA Blog Network

Plugged In

Plugged In

More than wires - exploring the connections between energy, environment, and our lives
Plugged In HomeAboutContact

Plenty of Fish in the Sea?

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

Email   PrintPrint

Tuna clustering off the coast of southern Italy. Photo: Courtesy of the UN FAO

In 2010, people across the globe munched their way through 128 million tons of seafood. That’s according to the latest data coming out of the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). This hefty supply of fish equals around 41 pounds per person each year, and is taking its toll on the health of the oceans and, in turn, food security, economic prosperity, and coastal communities.

Here’s a bit of perspective: In 1974, 40 percent of marine fish species were deemed “non-fully exploited,” a slightly obscure term meaning that the population is thriving and hasn’t been fished beyond or just up to a sustainable level (60% or more of the virgin stock exists). Less than 40 years later, the number has plunged to about 13 percent.

Species on the current “safe” list include the Northern Prawn, American cupped oyster, European Pilchard, or sardine, the common cuttlefish and squids, Argentine anchovy and Polar cod. Don’t frequently see these on many restaurant menus? There are a number of reasons why, says the FAO. Many of these species have a low value to fishermen, their location makes fishing difficult, or they’re not in large enough concentrations in the water to make it worthwhile.

Though there have been ups and downs over the years in the percentage of “over” or “fully-exploited fish,” the general trend is one of decline. Today, 30 percent of world’s fish stocks are over-exploited, a slight decrease from the previous two years, and approximately 57 percent are fully exploited.

“The declining global marine catch over the last few years together with the increased percentage of overexploited fish stocks and the decreased proportion of non-fully exploited species around the world convey the strong message that the state of world marine fisheries is worsening and has had a negative impact on fishery production,” the report says.

The solution? Hard quotas, also known as annual catch limits, concrete deadlines for achieving and maintaining sustainable fishing levels, and strict accountability measures, such as closing a fishery if they don’t heed the rules, says the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Fisheries Division (NOAA).

Countries around the globe are embracing this tactic, including the U.S., which has been following in New Zealand’s wake. It’s paying off, says Dr. Richard Merrick, Chief Science Advisor for NOAA Fisheries.

The U.S. is now the first country to enforce annual catch limits on every single species under its jurisdiction. In updating the Magneson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act in 2006 to require annual catch limits by the end of 2010 on “all stocks subject to overfishing,” and for the remaining stocks by the end of 2011, an end to overfishing is possible.

Today, 67 percent of all stocks are now sustainably harvested in the U.S., while only 17 percent are still over-exploited (this data is from 2009 and these statistics have improved since then). Also, in the last 11 years, 27 of its marine fish populations have been rebuilt.

“With annual catch limits in place this year for all domestic fish populations and the continued commitment of fishermen to rebuild the stocks they rely on, we’re making even greater progress in ending overfishing and rebuilding stocks around the nation,” said Samuel Rauch, acting assistant NOAA administrator for fisheries in their press release.

This type of science-based cautionary approach to fisheries management may be bait worth biting.

Robynne Boyd About the Author: Robynne Boyd began writing about people and the planet when living barefoot and by campfire on the North Shore of Kauai, Hawaii. Over a decade later and now fully dependent on electricity, she continues this work as an editor for IISD Reporting Services. When not in search of misplaced commas and terser prose, Robynne writes about environment and energy. She lives in Atlanta, Georgia.

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

Rights & Permissions

Comments 2 Comments

Add Comment
  1. 1. jtdwyer 1:34 pm 08/3/2012

    I have to mention that the global population has nearly tripled since 1950, and that rural populations have increasingly migrated to large cities, most of which are located near seashores. Now over 7 billion, the global population is expected to increase to 9 billion by 2050. Even if the U.S. complies with annual catch limits, there are nearly 6.7 billion other people out there…

    Link to this
  2. 2. jerryd 2:33 pm 08/3/2012

    More attention to fishing equipment that destroys far more than it catches inculding habitat destruction keeping future fish from thriving.

    Better also would be smaller, far more eff boats with small crews means they would be profitable on far smaller catches. Ones run on oil are going to not be competitive soon.

    Facts are if we treat the ocean, rivers, lakes well they can produce much more than now of better quality but only if we get smart about them.

    Link to this

Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a member to submit a comment.

More from Scientific American

Email this Article