About the SA Blog Network  

Plugged In

Plugged In


More than wires - exploring the connections between energy, environment, and our lives
Plugged In HomeAboutContact

Shouldering Our Way into Transit Solutions


ShareShare  ShareEmail  PrintPrint



Everybody has sat wedged in a freeway traffic jam, casting longing glances at the empty shoulder. Yeah, it’s illegal, but … man. If you could just … go.

You could if you were on a bus. So my heroes today? The people who figured out that if you drive buses down the shoulders of crowded highways, you have suddenly solved a seemingly unsolvable problem with almost no expenditure of money, and you have scored wins on more fronts than you can count.

I just stumbled onto this elegant idea because here in central North Carolina where I live, the city of Durham has decided to use it as a solution to I-40, the all but permanently choked superhighway that links Raleigh, Durham, and the Research Triangle Park between them.

The idea? When the highway traffic chokes, buses get to drive on the shoulder.

Take a second to just grok that.

This is North Carolina, where until very recently public transportation was considered borderline socialist by everybody, not just crazy people. But the problem is, what with the moving goal posts of federal programs, the pendulum of opinion about heavy and light rail swinging like a metronome set at prestissimo, and the enormous cost of building anything new, the Triangle has missed out on almost every transit opportunity for two decades. The reality is that if public transportation throughout our multi-centric region will improve any time soon, that improvement will involve buses. And we don’t mean Bus Rapid Transit, with dedicated lanes that themselves cost $13 million a mile, according to a GAO study – an old study, mind you.

So for the foreseeable future, improved public transportation means buses on the roads we got. And the thing about buses, of course, is they sit in the same traffic as everybody else, so they don’t save much time. And people sitting in cars cursing at traffic may look at a train whizzing by and say, “Hey – I’m jealous. Next time, maybe that’s for me.” But looking at people in a stuck bus cursing right back at you? That doesn’t look so pleasant.

So someone — in Minneapolis, it turns out, and twenty years ago — got the idea of saying, “Hey — what if when traffic slows to below 35 mph we let the buses ride on the shoulder?”

There’s no story about the power of that light bulb, when it went on over someone’s head, illuminating the Twin Cities for a month, but my gosh, how brilliant is that? No infrastructure to build, and yet there’s a free lane of traffic just for buses. The cars get just as stuck — but the buses look a million times more attractive when they’re trundling along on the shoulder, up to 15 mph faster than the clogged traffic, passing the glum car passengers by.

It works great in Minneapolis, where they have somehow been doing it for two decades without my noticing it. Shoulders are only 10 feet wide (on one highway only 9.5) whereas traffic lanes are 12, but the drivers are professionals and apparently don’t have any more accidents than usual. That hasn’t stopped the locals from improving the system, though —  they call it Bus 2.0 and have developed Driver Assist Systems (DAS) that for extra safety use GPS to help keep drivers on their shoulder lanes.

They’ve developed procedures for preparing freeways for bus-only shoulders, and the costs are marvelously low: from $1500 per mile if all you have to do is add signs and lane markings to $80,000 to $100,000 per mile if you need to realign, harden, and repave the shoulder and the rest of the roadway isn’t being repaved. Compare that, of course, with even that old GAO estimate of bus rapid transit averaging more than $13 million per mile, with any variety of rail costing much more than that.

It’s worked so well it’s becoming a model. According to this recent Atlantic piece, cities like Miami, Seattle, and Columbus are on the bus, and Chicago is beginning to do it – and now the Triangle too. It appears to increase bus ridership – how many times would it take you watching a bus get a free pass by you before you tried it? It’s cheap. And it works. Bus-only shoulders take their place alongside slugging, called “the people’s transit.” They fill a need without building a new anything, solve a problem by using freeway shoulders – something we’ve already got on every mile of freeway. Technology we already have, used in a new way by smart people thinking outside the box — or anyhow outside the lane.

So the hopefulness in driving buses on the shoulder is that simplest of wins: it works. It’s a kludge, but it gets the job done. Who can doubt that if here in the Triangle  the buses skip the Durham traffic jams it won’t be long before Raleigh authorizes the same behavior. Then the buses connecting Raleigh and Durham can approach the reliability of trains, and then using them approaches that level of comfort. And that causes more people to use them, which causes people planning the next generation of transportation — roads, roadways, corridors — to include space for transit, and then whether you’re talking rails, dedicated roadways, or heck, double-wide shoulders for that matter, you’ve changed your paradigm and improved your planet.

 

Scott HulerAbout the Author: A writer who commonly explores science, culture, and the relationship between the two. Follow on Twitter @huler.

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.





Post a comment | Read Comments (5)

Comments 5 Comments

Add Comment
  1. 1. meltee 10:44 pm 12/22/2011

    I rode buses that used the shoulder of a 6 lane feeder highway in Montgomery County Maryland during designated rush hour times at least as long ago as 1996. The route seemed well established back then, and it is still operational. The bus did not travel any faster then the cars in open stretches, but cars would be backed up 1/4 mile or more at traffic lights and the bus would just cruise past them up to the intersection. Riding the bus was not only faster, but a lot more relaxing than fighting the traffic. And there were no parking fees to pay.

    Link to this
  2. 2. MNtransit 10:43 am 12/23/2011

    Employed by Metro Transit, I’m the guy in Minnesota who dreamed up the shoulder bus lane and led their development for 15 years until I retired. There are now over 290 miles of them and they have freed the Minneapolis-St. Paul express bus network from traffic congestion. But it couldn’t have happened without some visionary engineers at MnDOT who were willing to suspend their usual standards (buses on shoulders violate all sorts of highway standards) and experiment with something kinda radical. I’ve been unpleasantly surprised at how long it has taken other cities to adopt them. Aaron Isaacs, Minneapolis

    Link to this
  3. 3. huler 1:35 pm 12/23/2011

    @meltee, would love to learn more about that. I’ll look into it — thanks. @MNtransit, I would LOVE to talk to you about this. An interview would help people understand how great ideas like this work, yes? If you go to my website (scotthuler.com) and click the contact button to email me, that’ll go directly to my desk. Shoot me a line, and thanks — both for the comment and this great idea.

    Link to this
  4. 4. Bora Zivkovic 3:47 pm 12/23/2011

    That is so awesome – I’d love to see the interview with the inventor of the concept. And Scott forgot – there is a much easier way: just click on “Contact” button next to his blog banner, under the blog name.

    Link to this
  5. 5. criss 12:47 pm 12/26/2011

    Wow, this is…not a good idea. I live in the Boston area, and around here shoulders are used as regular lanes during rush hour. The result: it is difficult and scary to get from the right lane to an exit ramp, and worse to merge into traffic from an entrance ramp. It’s hard to see the traffic on the shoulder from the ramp, since it wasn’t designed that way–the angles are set up for visibility into the right lane–and also, shoulder traffic tends to go faster than the regular right lane, since people who take this option and drive on the shoulder are usually among the more aggressive drivers. I can only imagine that sporadic bus traffic would be even more dangerous, visibility-wise, than constant car traffic, because drivers wouldn’t be sure what they needed to be looking for.

    Even worse, if someone has car trouble and needs the shoulder to get out of the way, it’s impossible. Where there are guard rails on both sides, the shoulder provides a vital safety valve that goes away when it’s just another lane. When it’s the FAST lane, the danger is greater still. When it’s a lane for speeding buses, which need far more time to maneuver than passenger cars do, I foresee truly horrific outcomes.

    And in the long run, this short-sighted measure will cost more than you think. Asphalt is tapered towards the edges for drainage, and when you heavily weight those thinned-down edges, they are going to crumble. Professional truck drivers know that it’s best for the road surface for them to drive in the center lane when possible; I really can’t imagine how putting buses right on the edge is anything but asking for trouble.

    Link to this

Add a Comment
You must log in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X