October 24, 2011
|
2
Today, more than 80% of the energy used in the United States comes from fossil fuels – specifically from petroleum, natural gas and coal. In the transportation sector, this number is even higher with fossil fuels (almost exclusively petroleum) supplying 97% of the total energy used. But, on the electric power side of the equation, while coal and natural gas still supply more than two-thirds of the total energy used, petroleum barely registers. This is why turning off the lights in your home of office probably won’t reduce your petroleum consumption.
The Energy Information Administration (EIA) publishes a data-packed graphic that shows the flows of energy between supply sources and demand sectors in the United States. In this graphic, you can see that the transportation sector is responsible for 28% of total energy demand in the US and that 94% of this energy comes from petroleum (3% comes from natural gas, and the remaining 3% comes from a mix of renewables, including biofuels). But in the electric power sector, only 1% of the total energy supply comes from petroleum.
The nation’s top two consumers of petroleum in terms of total BTUs used for electric power generation are Florida and Hawaii. But, due to Florida’s above average total electricity use, petroleum only supplies about 0.4% of its total electric power generation needs. Hawaii, on the other hand, uses petroleum-fired power plants for about three-fourths of its electricity.
For the rest of the United States, petroleum represents a small fraction of the electricity supplied. This means that, reducing your power consumption probably won’t lead to a significant reduction your indirect petroleum consumption. Instead (in terms of fossil fuels) it is more likely to reduce your consumption of coal and natural gas.
Calculation inputs:
Photo Credit:
Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.
Live in Florida and just got back from Hawaii. Main difference I noticed was the number of solar & wind installations in Hawaii vs Florida. There are many installations in Hawaii(Houses and Commercial) and adds in all the papers to put more up. In Florida, I can’t think of any that I’ve seen(installations or advertisements)…
Link to this@Wayne – Thanks for your comments.
Hawaii is definitely pushing for more solar and other renewables for their system, which you can see in all the new installations as well as the numerous large-scale efficiency projects that they are working on over there.
It’s really interesting to see how the price of electricity (which is very high in Hawaii because so much of their electricity comes from diesel generators) makes the economics for solar much more attractive. Right now, Hawaii sits at about 36 cents/kWh for residential electricity, versus the US average of about 12 cents/kWh. Florida, on the other hand sits at just about the average, at just under 12 cents/kWh. So, solar has a tougher time there compared to Hawaii in terms of the economic argument.
http://www.eia.gov/state/state-energy-profiles-data.cfm?sid=HI#Prices
Link to this