About the SA Blog Network

Plugged In

Plugged In

More than wires - exploring the connections between energy, environment, and our lives
Plugged In HomeAboutContact

Turning off the Lights Won’t Save Oil

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

Email   PrintPrint

Today, more than 80% of the energy used in the United States comes from fossil fuels – specifically from petroleum, natural gas and coal. In the transportation sector, this number is even higher with fossil fuels (almost exclusively petroleum) supplying 97% of the total energy used. But, on the electric power side of the equation, while coal and natural gas still supply more than two-thirds of the total energy used, petroleum barely registers. This is why turning off the lights in your home of office probably won’t reduce your petroleum consumption.

The Energy Information Administration (EIA) publishes a data-packed graphic that shows the flows of energy between supply sources and demand sectors in the United States. In this graphic, you can see that the transportation sector is responsible for 28% of total energy demand in the US and that 94% of this energy comes from petroleum (3% comes from natural gas, and the remaining 3% comes from a mix of renewables, including biofuels). But in the electric power sector, only 1% of the total energy supply comes from petroleum.

The nation’s top two consumers of petroleum in terms of total BTUs used for electric power generation are Florida and Hawaii. But, due to Florida’s above average total electricity use, petroleum only supplies about 0.4% of its total electric power generation needs. Hawaii, on the other hand, uses petroleum-fired power plants for about three-fourths of its electricity.

For the rest of the United States, petroleum represents a small fraction of the electricity supplied. This means that, reducing your power consumption probably won’t lead to a significant reduction your indirect petroleum consumption. Instead (in terms of fossil fuels) it is more likely to reduce your consumption of coal and natural gas.

Calculation inputs:

  1. Total energy from petroleum consumed by the US electric power sector in 2009 = 390 trillion BTUs (sum of residential and distillate fuel oil and petroleum coke)
  2. Total energy from petroleum consumed by US electric power sector by state
    1. Florida = 97 trillion BTUs (~0.4% of total generation)
    2. Hawaii = 80 trillion BTUs (~74% of total generation)
    3. New York = 26.6 trillion BTUs (~1.6% of total generation)
    4. Kentucky = 24.2 trillion BTUs
    5. California = 18.5 trillion BTUs

Photo Credit:

  1. Graphic courtesy of the United States Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration (EIA).
Melissa C. Lott About the Author: An engineer and researcher who works at the intersection of energy, environment, technology, and policy. Follow on Twitter @mclott.

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

Rights & Permissions

Comments 2 Comments

Add Comment
  1. 1. Wayne Williamson 6:23 pm 10/25/2011

    Live in Florida and just got back from Hawaii. Main difference I noticed was the number of solar & wind installations in Hawaii vs Florida. There are many installations in Hawaii(Houses and Commercial) and adds in all the papers to put more up. In Florida, I can’t think of any that I’ve seen(installations or advertisements)…

    Link to this
  2. 2. Melissa Lott 7:07 pm 10/25/2011

    @Wayne – Thanks for your comments.

    Hawaii is definitely pushing for more solar and other renewables for their system, which you can see in all the new installations as well as the numerous large-scale efficiency projects that they are working on over there.

    It’s really interesting to see how the price of electricity (which is very high in Hawaii because so much of their electricity comes from diesel generators) makes the economics for solar much more attractive. Right now, Hawaii sits at about 36 cents/kWh for residential electricity, versus the US average of about 12 cents/kWh. Florida, on the other hand sits at just about the average, at just under 12 cents/kWh. So, solar has a tougher time there compared to Hawaii in terms of the economic argument.

    Link to this

Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a member to submit a comment.

More from Scientific American

Email this Article