About the SA Blog Network

Plugged In

Plugged In

More than wires - exploring the connections between energy, environment, and our lives
Plugged In HomeAboutContact

The South’s Nuclear Revival?

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

Email   PrintPrint

Construction of Vogtle units 3 and 4 (on right) in August 2011. Image: copyright Southern Company, Inc.

After attending a nuclear fuel symposium a few weeks back, I felt it time to examine what’s occurring in my own backyard in this regard. What I learned is that Georgia, with its two pending nuclear reactors, may serve as the country’s litmus test for the nuclear renaissance.

Currently, there is only one commercial reactor under construction in the U.S., and that’s the Watts Bar Unit 2 reactor in Tennessee. This project began decades ago, but paused in the 1980′s for about 20 years because of decreasing electricity demands. The reactor is now expected to go online in 2013.

The country’s first newly designed nuclear reactor – Westinghouse Electric Co.‘s AP1000 pressurized water reactor – is now awaiting approval by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Two of these are scheduled to be built at Plant Vogtle, which is located about 160 miles southeast of Atlanta, Ga., near Waynesboro. Construction should begin in the early days of 2012 as long as Southern Company receives a Combined Construction and Operating License from the NRC, which will be discussed in a couple of weeks on Sept. 27.

“The reactors will provide an additional 2,200 MW of nuclear energy currently being generated at Plant Vogtle and Plant Hatch,” wrote Georgia Power spokeswoman Konswello Monroe in an email, noting that one MW of electricity serves 400 households.

Already, Georgia’s two nuclear plants – Plant Vogtle and Plant Hatch – comprise 21 percent of Georgia Power’s generation sources. This percentage is bound to increase once the reactors are built, further solidifying nuclear as part of Georgia’s electricity portfolio. Yet, in an industry infamous for construction delays and price hikes, the $14 billion project, which received $8.3 billion in loan guarantees from the Department of Energy for Southern Company subsidiary Georgia Power, has many people watching.

“I believe we are all concerned about the large expense going into rate base over the next few years,” wrote Public Service Commissioner Stan Wise in an email, adding that $6.1 billion is a large price to pay, but that the Commission’s integrated resource plan at the time of approval showed the plant to be the least cost option. “The risk of cost overruns has our attention as well, although at this point we are on time and on budget with $2 billion in the ground of the overall cost of $14 billion yet to come.”

The success of the plant could hold great sway in the future building of nuclear in our country, added Wise. Even so, not everyone is embracing the possibility of testing a new nuclear reactor here in Ga., especially since safety and dispossessed spent fuel remains areas of concern. Protests have occurred in this light.

At Plant Hatch spent fuel pools and dry cask storage is used to store fuel. At Plant Vogtle, spent fuel pools are used.

“Although we have safe, reliable, on-site options for storing used fuel, it is still important to recognize that our country needs a permanent central repository for used nuclear fuel,” wrote Georgia Power spokeswoman Monroe.”

In other words, the litmus test for a nuclear renaissance will be comprised of four parts – pricing, construction time, reactor safety and fuel management. Eyes are turned to Vogtle to see how each pans out.

Robynne Boyd About the Author: Robynne Boyd began writing about people and the planet when living barefoot and by campfire on the North Shore of Kauai, Hawaii. Over a decade later and now fully dependent on electricity, she continues this work as an editor for IISD Reporting Services. When not in search of misplaced commas and terser prose, Robynne writes about environment and energy. She lives in Atlanta, Georgia.

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

Rights & Permissions

Comments 2 Comments

Add Comment
  1. 1. Kayaker 12:50 pm 09/15/2011

    Don’t overlook South Carolina where SCE&G is on track to receive approval/start construction about the same time.

    Link to this
  2. 2. rboyd 12:08 pm 09/16/2011

    That’s right. Thanks for the reminder, Kayaker.

    Link to this

Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a member to submit a comment.

More from Scientific American

Email this Article