About the SA Blog Network



Opinion, arguments & analyses from the editors of Scientific American
Observations HomeAboutContact

Mystery Lingers around Origin of GM Wheat in Oregon

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

Email   PrintPrint

When the fresh wheat samples arrived at her lab this spring, Carol Mallory-Smith, a weed scientist, didn’t know what to expect. The concerned farmer who sent them had contacted her because a patch of wheat had refused to die after being treated with a powerful herbicide called Roundup. “The farmer asked me if the wheat could have evolved a natural resistance to the herbicide,” says Mallory-Smith, “but I said that that wasn’t possible because of the way wheat is exposed to Roundup.” Then the grower mentioned the possibility that Monsanto’s genetically modified wheat seeds might have made their way into the field somehow. “I thought that was extremely unlikely,” she adds. “Obviously, I was wrong.”

Credit: Böhringer Friedrich

On May 1, with GMO-positive test results in hand, Mallory-Smith contacted the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s  Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service to tell them that unapproved seeds which had been engineered 14 years beforehand by one of the biggest agricultural companies in the world, Monsanto, had somehow found their way into a wheat field in Oregon. And on May 29, the USDA alerted the public about the genetically modified wheat’s presence in Oregon. Now, more than two months after its discovery, the USDA still hasn’t released any information on the wheat’s origins. And although we may never find out how those seeds made it to that particular field, we can at least explain what makes these seeds so special in the first place.

Genetically Modified Wheat Information Graphic
Click here to enlarge.

Roundup Ready soybeans were the first Roundup Ready crop to gain USDA approval, in 1994. Four years later, Monsanto started testing its Roundup Ready wheat in the U.S. The testing took place in 16 states for a period of seven years. With what appears to have been successful test results in hand, Monsanto consulted in 2005 with the National Association of Wheat Growers to assess the genetically modified wheat’s market viability. Unfortunately for Monsanto, the farmers’ reactions were underwhelming.

“Wheat growers weren’t interested because their customers weren’t interested,” says Blake Rowe, CEO of the Oregon Wheat Commission. Monsanto decided not to seek USDA approval for the wheat because the market wasn’t ready for it. The company discontinued the U.S. wheat tests instead and burned most of the seeds—43 seed containers were kept in a Colorado storage facility until their incineration in 2011. But burning the entirety of the Monsanto’s seed stock apparently didn’t stop the GM wheat from popping up in Oregon earlier this year.

“It would be nice to know how the wheat got there,” Rowe says. “We don’t want to solve the wrong problem and waste a bunch of effort because of speculation.” No matter where the seeds came from, “this is not an event that farmers welcome in any way, shape or form,” he adds. For Oregon farmers, public opinion matters, and the media coverage surrounding U.S. wheat is worrisome. “We’re definitely ready,” he says, “for things to go back to normal.”

Arielle Duhaime-Ross About the Author: Arielle is a Scientific American editorial intern. She covers a variety of topics including health, technology and zoology. Follow on Twitter @arielledross.

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

Rights & Permissions

Comments 4 Comments

Add Comment
  1. 1. singing flea 5:53 am 07/10/2013

    It sounds like simple logic to me. The easiest way to get farmers to accept the GM seeds is to say, “Well looky here…they are already growing in your fields and now you have a lawsuit problem thanks to our friends in the courthouses.

    Link to this
  2. 2. rknight101 12:21 pm 07/10/2013

    In the above chart under Food Safety it states “Currently, there is no scientific evidence that Roundup Ready crops are harmful to human health.”
    This is a ridiculous claim since NO epidemiological studies to look at GM food effects on the general population have ever been conducted. There has been a recent long term rat study that shows many harmful health effects, including liver and kidney toxicity and tumors.

    Long term toxicity of a Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize

    Link to this
  3. 3. greenhome123 7:47 pm 07/10/2013

    I’ve heard that it is possible for genes to transfer from one type of plant to another via horizontal gene transfer from pollen, so could it be possible that the wheat was grown near the Scotts/Monsanto GMO Bentgrass farm in Oregon, and obtained the Roundup Resistance via horizontal gene transfer?

    Link to this
  4. 4. kienhua68 12:30 pm 07/15/2013

    Why is no one asking the question, what ARE farmers using to control weeds. Could it be worse than Round-Up?

    Link to this

Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a member to submit a comment.

More from Scientific American

Email this Article