ADVERTISEMENT
  About the SA Blog Network













Observations

Observations


Opinion, arguments & analyses from the editors of Scientific American
Observations HomeAboutContact

Surf Switzerland on World Oceans Day

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.


Email   PrintPrint



Today—June 8—is World Ocean Day. Like Earth Day, it is meant to draw attention to issues that threaten ocean health and sustainability. What can you do? Well, for starters, avoid eating fish that appear on any red or yellow “do not consume” lists. Pick up trash when you’re walking along the shore. And celebrate the ocean: jump into the water, maybe sail or surf a wave (skip the gasoline engines).

Another thing you can do is surf the Web, to a destination that may at first seem unlikely: the World Economic Forum. That’s right, the Geneva-based nonprofit foundation that holds the annual conference in Davos, Switzerland, by the same name. The meeting brings together business and political leaders, intellectuals, celebrities and journalists. The forum’s larger goal is to “improve the state of the world.” It has released a two-minute animated film, Ideas for Change, that encourages people to take better care of the oceans.

Produced by Lonelyleap, the video is narrated by Sylvia Earle, the distinguished oceanographer, environmental advocate and explorer in residence at the National Geographic Society. Earle says, “We have looked at the ocean as a place to put things we don’t want and as a place to take things that seemed in infinite quantity.” But she points out that we’ve lost as much as 90 percent of big fish such as tuna and marlin. Among other things, the film calls for a ban on bottom trawling for fish. Earle concludes by saying, “I think of the ocean as the blue heart of the planet. Well, how much of your heart do you want to protect?”

The World Economic Forum has also released an online trove of information, links and infographics that outline the benefits the ocean affords us and the challenges we have to overcome to sustain them. One statistic that caught my eye is that “the ocean provides oxygen for one of every two breaths we breathe”—oxygen given off by phytoplankton during photosynthesis. A cornerstone of the Web site is the Ocean Health Index, which rates waters bordering 171 countries and territories in 10 categories, such as biodiversity, clean water, coastal protection, and contribution to tourism and the economy. Scientific American created an interactive graphic last summer when the index was released, and the work continues to educate national governments about how countries can clean up and preserve the ocean so it can serve both people and nature for centuries to come.

Photo courtesy of augustusoz on Flickr

Mark Fischetti About the Author: Mark Fischetti is a senior editor at Scientific American who covers energy, environment and sustainability issues. Follow on Twitter @markfischetti.

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.





Rights & Permissions

Comments 1 Comment

Add Comment
  1. 1. N a g n o s t i c 5:12 pm 06/10/2013

    Surf the internet on New World Order Day – and expose all of your private matters to the NSA, unless we decide to get up and do something about it. Edward Snowden has, and he might be killed for doing so.

    Warning: Off-topic comment. It has to be posted because SA doesn’t deem a technological misuse issue of importance to everybody worth talking about.

    A week and counting, and the brave Edward Snowden and NSA’s Prism program are being reported everywhere – except here at Scientific American. One sycophantic, government apologist article posted June 8th doesn’t qualify as reporting. It’s positively embarrassing.

    This is quite puzzling to me… cryptographic even. The same revelations during the Bush administration would’ve generated plenty of negative SA editorializing and blogging; they did just that, over similar news of a lesser nature at the time.

    I suppose it’s better to see very little spoken here concerning a story in continuing development everywhere else, as SA and its bloggers would probably blame Bush as their counterparts at NYT, WP, MSNBC and CBS did reflexively. Those guys came across as administration lapdogs who got scooped by the British paper The Guardian. Instead of doing journalism, they’re acting as organs of the state, so far. Scientific American is being uncharacteristically mum. Perhaps they’re getting their ideological house in order.

    I can’t help but notice Snowden isn’t blaming Bush – he’s blaming the guy he voted for, our current president. How appropriate of him. No sycophantic rust jamming his ideological gears. He voted for the current administration, and has the intellectual honesty to act on his rightful dismay – risking his life in the process.

    What a brave man – he’s a true hero.

    Link to this

Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.

More from Scientific American

Scientific American Holiday Sale

Limited Time Only!

Get 50% off Digital Gifts

Hurry sale ends 12/31 >

X

Email this Article

X