Subscription Center
January 28, 2013
| 
2
Twenty-seven years ago today space shuttle Challenger exploded shortly after takeoff from Kennedy Space Center in Florida, killing all seven crewmembers onboard. Among the victims of the 1986 disaster was astronaut Ronald McNair, who two years earlier had become the second African-American in space.
McNair lived only 35 years, but he amassed quite a résumé in that time. In addition to earning a spot in the astronaut corps, he attained a black belt in karate and received a Ph.D. in physics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, according to his NASA bio.
A new video from StoryCorps, an oral-history nonprofit that broadcasts stories on NPR, reveals McNair as a uniquely driven individual, even before any of those accomplishments. The astronaut’s brother, Carl McNair, recorded a few anecdotes from their upbringing during Jim Crow in 1950s South Carolina, recalling Ronald as a strong-willed dreamer. The three-minute animated video that accompanies Carl’s story—a warm tribute to his astronaut brother—is embedded below.
2 Comments
Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.
What Rational Really Means
Is It Quantum Computing or Not?
Bush-crow diaries: Settling in with the Borana
Is Homosexuality Natural? Yes. So is male lactation.
Why Barns Are Red, and More - The Countdown, Episode 22 
Bora's Picks (May 17th, 2013)
See what we're tweeting about
jgold85 RT @LATerynbrown: Inside the crosstown rivalry: USC/UCLA neuroscience edition! http://t.co/5q6PLVQ0kY (with @larrygordonLAT)
Horganism How to "Steel Minority Students against Fear of Failure," plus my proposal on racial research: http://t.co/cwOaef3SZ4 http://t.co/3f4IO5s7Fw
gmusser N.J. has passed an important solar milestone: 1GW of solar power generation capacity. http://t.co/yryIHeLdLL
YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.
Share
Email
Print
So much ‘space’ science is not science at all but repetitive historical vignettes. Rebasting events in their own sauce.
It’s politically incorrect to say so, but how about more articles of actual space and space technology?
Link to thisI clearly remember the news article in late 1985 that described a close call with a leaky booster. I solved the challenger disaster ( roughly speaking ) immediately. Nostradamus did better.
Link to this