ADVERTISEMENT
  About the SA Blog Network













Observations

Observations


Opinion, arguments & analyses from the editors of Scientific American
Observations HomeAboutContact

Could Cell Phones Stop People from Texting While Driving?

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.


Email   PrintPrint



People have gotten good at multitasking, but sometimes this skill is taken too far, and the result can be deadly. Texting while driving a car is a prime example. Laws prohibit it, but many people still find it impossible to resist. Ideally, there would be a way to eliminate the temptation altogether, through safeguards on the cell phone itself. At the moment that’s not possible, but it may soon be.

Researchers at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) are studying how software on a cell phone could analyze keystrokes to determine when that phone’s user is distracted while composing and sending text messages. This doesn’t necessarily mean the person is driving, of course, but combined with GPS and other data, it may be possible to determine when a texter is behind the wheel. In that case, the phone could shut off texting functions automatically. Such a feature could take the form of a mobile app for any phone—independent of the manufacturer, operating system and wireless service provider.

“If you think of your brain as a CPU, multi-tasking means your brain is dealing with a large amount of information,” says Mike Watkins, manager of applied physics at PNNL, operated by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science. “Related to texting, even if you don’t have to look at your cell phone screen, you’re still cycling those mental resources.”

Such “cognitive timesharing” behind the wheel isn’t anything new—car stereos, argumentative passengers and even eating all contribute to distracting drivers. But texting is especially problematic because it involves manual, visual and cognitive distraction simultaneously. Sending or reading a text takes a driver’s eyes off the road for 4.6 seconds, according to the U.S. Department of Transportation’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), which estimates that at 88 kilometers per hour—the U.S. speed limit in many areas—such a lapse in concentration is like driving the length of an entire football field while blindfolded.

The NHTSA estimates that in 2010 more than 3,000 people were killed and 416,000 others injured in road wrecks caused by distracted driving in the U.S., including crashes involving texting or other cell phone use. In response to the larger problem, the NHTSA earlier this week announced a new grant program to provide about $17.5 million to states that have enacted and are enforcing anti-distracted driving laws, including anti-texting statutes.

The PNNL researchers are hoping their work can help in ways that laws cannot—using the phones themselves to flag those who can’t resist the impulse to text and drive. They tested their approach in a limited study a few years ago by analyzing the behavior of six study participants who were instructed to text while operating a driving simulator.

The texters used a Nokia model 6790 Surge phone that logged the duration and sequence of keystrokes during a 20-minute texting session and then during a 20-minute texting session while using the driving simulator. During simulated driving, the texters used several techniques to tap out short messages: by placing both palms on top of the steering wheel while texting, by using a single hand to text, and by taking both hands off the steering wheel and returning them intermittently to make steering corrections. Drivers would drive off the road, run red lights and commit other acts of poor driving, being tracked all the while.

The researchers then investigated the potential to use various keystroke dynamics as a means of determining if an individual was texting while driving. In particular, they focused on “keystroke entropy,” when keys were struck at irregular intervals, as an indicator that the test subjects’ attention was divided between texting and driving.

After evaluating the sensitivity of the keystroke entropy indicator against the number of keystrokes recorded, the researchers found they could accurately and relatively quickly identify when a test subject had been both texting and operating the simulator. They found normal texting took on more rhythmic patterns.

The study is limited, Watkins acknowledges, because it used so few participants and a simulator as opposed to an actual car. He and his colleagues are hoping to expand their test to drivers on a closed course, where safety would be more of a concern to participants.

Image courtesy of maureenpr, via iStockphoto.com

About the Author: Larry is the associate editor of technology for Scientific American, covering a variety of tech-related topics, including biotech, computers, military tech, nanotech and robots. Follow on Twitter @lggreenemeier.

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.





Rights & Permissions

Comments 7 Comments

Add Comment
  1. 1. IncredibleMouse 7:51 am 08/24/2012

    The map/driving/social application “Waze” already has this feature built in. It will not let you ping comments to other drivers while it detects your car moving via changes in speed, detected via GPS. It does, however, provide a button called “Passenger”, that will instantly enable texting, even if the GPS detects driving over a certain speed. This same simple system should be built into the messaging feature of phones. The obvious problem here is that GPS is optional, and there will always be ways to circumvent. It is probably because of the fact that GPS is optional that they are looking at other means of driving detection, like pattern recognition.

    Link to this
  2. 2. Traveler 007 8:50 am 08/24/2012

    IncredibleMouse
    If it has a button to push called “passenger” then this is useless as if anybody is the type to text and drive all they would have to do is hit the button which if anything, would be one more distraction added to the texting.

    Link to this
  3. 3. ruspert 10:06 am 08/24/2012

    The answer is very simple. Do not allow the service provider to have texting as an option. Problem solved for all. No more texting anywhere.

    Link to this
  4. 4. BillR 10:55 am 08/24/2012

    Whatever the solution is, it should be a part of the operating system of the phone and not an app. It should be a legal requirement for any cell phone sold in the US.

    I wonder if the phone could sample the environment (sound of an engine running as heard from inside a car, or a quick peak through the camera looking for a portion of the dashboard or steering wheel as seen from the drivers seat) whenever the texting app is called up and not allow it to function if the ambient conditions indicate the inside of a car.

    Maybe just automatically revoke your license for 6 months and call in a police cruiser if any of the traffic cams catch you texting while behind the wheel. That would really improve traffic in some areas!

    Link to this
  5. 5. scientific earthling 9:52 pm 08/24/2012

    Yes they can, but No they wont.

    Accidents, carnage & deaths on the roads make businesses a lot of money. Who cares about your pain?

    The super rich are the most vicious people on the planet; that is why the Australian Liberal policy of “Send the money to the Top” will never work and just cause more misery and poverty.

    A good side it increases the death rate, and that is good for an extremely overpopulated planet.

    Link to this
  6. 6. ErikWood 9:56 pm 08/25/2012

    Texting is an efficient communications medium, a powerful fund raising tool and even a crime reporting method – to name a few upsides. But I also think technology should be able to help us facilitate unplugging – especially when driving down the highway in 5000 pounds of steel and glass.

    After my three year old daughter was nearly run down by a texting driver in 2009, I invented an app to manage texting whether the user is at home, in the office or on the road. Its simple and easy to schedule “texting blackout periods” with all notifications silenced so you can focus on the task at hand without feeling disconnected from your social network. Teens can study or sleep and adults…well maybe we can remind ourselves that technology should be complimenting our lives and not the other way around.

    Erik Wood, owner
    OTTER app
    do one thing well… be great.

    Link to this
  7. 7. Quinn the Eskimo 5:22 pm 09/2/2012

    What ever happened to the idea that you can simply TURN THE DAM THING OFF???

    Link to this

Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.

More from Scientific American

Scientific American Back To School

Back to School Sale!

12 Digital Issues + 4 Years of Archive Access just $19.99

Order Now >

X

Email this Article

X