About the SA Blog Network



Opinion, arguments & analyses from the editors of Scientific American
Observations HomeAboutContact

Skin Bacteria Are Your Friends

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

Email   PrintPrint

skin bacteria immune infection

Immune cells and commensual skin bacteria; courtesy of Lilly Koo/Jurai Kabat/Biological Imaging Facility/RTB/NIAID

Americans have been on an antibacterial kick for the past several years. Our hand soap, dish soap, and body wash have morphed into an arsenal of bug-killing napalm, eliminating all but the heartiest of bacteria.

And there are, indeed, some scary microbes crawling around out there—Staph and C. Diff, just to name a couple. But scientists are in the midst of discovering that not all bacteria are bad. In fact, the vast microcosm of life—bacterial, viral and fungal—that lives in and on us is not only mostly harmless but is actually necessary for our own good health.

Recent research has revealed that when we wipe out certain beneficial bacteria in our guts (with, say, a round of antibiotics prescribed to kill off a harmful bug), other, unwelcome species of bacteria can then move in and cause health problems.

A new study finds that the same might well be true for our skin. No matter how many showers you take each day, you’re still a walking colony of bacteria. And that’s a good thing, suggests research published online July 25 in Science.

A team of researchers led by Shruti Naik, of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease’s Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, examined what happens when mice were raised without the standard communities of skin microbes. One of the common, commensal bacteria is Staphlococcus epidermis. Without this friendly population on their skin, mice were more likely to get infected by the parasite Leishmania major (one species of Leishmania, which can cause leishmaniasis in humans, resulting in boils and open sores that do not heal).

The reason goes beyond a simple issue of clearing space for the invading bacteria to move in. Instead, the researchers suggest, the reason for worse infection hinges on interleukin 1 (IL-1) signaling, an immune response that the helpful bacteria can influence. “Resident commensals are required for optimal IL-1 signaling in the skin,” Naik and colleagues wrote. And that means that they, in turn, “are necessary for optimal skin immune fitness.” Past studies have implicated IL-1 signaling in psoriasis as well as asthma and arthritis.

The researchers also tested gut microbiota’s effects on skin infections.  Even though they live inside the body, gut flora indirectly help the skin fight off infections by contributing to immune system development and regulating some inflammatory responses. But they found that gut bacteria were much less important than skin bacteria to the development of the skin’s immune response.

These findings suggest that our much-ignored commensal skin bacteria play an important role in fending off infections. So perhaps all of those antibacterial baths are having effects that are more than skin deep.

Katherine Harmon Courage About the Author: Katherine Harmon Courage is a freelance writer and contributing editor for Scientific American. Her book Octopus! The Most Mysterious Creature In the Sea is out now from Penguin/Current. Follow on Twitter @KHCourage.

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

Rights & Permissions

Comments 3 Comments

Add Comment
  1. 1. zstansfi 2:45 am 07/27/2012

    This is definitely an interesting story. I wonder what the effects of commensal skin bacteria might be in acne and other skin disorders? This might lead us to rethink some of the central tenets of skin care proposed by the “beauty industry”.

    Link to this
  2. 2. JacobSilver 2:13 pm 08/5/2012

    Antibiotics were developed over 60 years ago, before we knew that we were a combination of our own cells, bacterial cells, fungi, and viri, with members of our bacterial biome numbering ten times the number of our own cells. Physicians are still using antibiotics, which do more harm to our biome than to the pathogens they are directed to. If it kills the pathogen, it also kills the vast majority of the bacteria in our biome. This is a form of insanity. The pharmaceutical firms should, and some may already be, working on more targeted drugs. We now know that there are bacterial phages which target specific bacteria. These phages can be harnessed and used medicinally to target specific pathogens without affecting the bacteria of our biome. Hopefully this method of anti-pathogen drugs are being developed.

    Link to this
  3. 3. upload70 11:47 am 10/4/2012

    they blame bacteria for acne and prescribe long courses of oral antibiotics that imho have no beneficial effect. Personally I noticed that increasing my own androgen levels prevented acne which is the opposite of what most experts would predict.

    Link to this

Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a member to submit a comment.

More from Scientific American

Email this Article