ADVERTISEMENT
  About the SA Blog Network













Observations

Observations


Opinion, arguments & analyses from the editors of Scientific American
Observations HomeAboutContact

Push Comes to Pull: What’s the Best Freestyle Swimming Stroke? [Video]


Email   PrintPrint



This summer’s Olympic games in London feature 14 different freestyle swimming competitions, by far the most races for any type of stroke. The world’s elite swimmers can traverse a 50-meter pool in 22 to 26 seconds, yet they are divided over which of two variations of the stroke are more effective: the more powerful “deep catch” approach or the more streamlined “scull.” And the physics behind the debate is fascinating.

In the deep catch approach, a swimmer puts his or her arm straight forward, then down as deep as possible into the water, and pushes that arm back as hard as possible, keeping the palms perpendicular to the direction the swimmer wants to move. In sculling, swimmers reach out but then bend their elbow, keeping it high in the water as their lower arm bends back past their body in an S-shaped pattern.

Is one stroke better than the other? The answer depends on the amount of power generated compared with the amount of drag caused by executing a particular stroke.

A team of researchers led by Rajat Mittal, vice chair of the mechanical engineering department at Johns Hopkins University, has used high-resolution video and underwater images to compare the two strokes. As seen in the video below, Mittal concludes that the propeller-like deep catch is more effective and more efficient than the sculling stroke.

Former Olympic swimmer Gary Hall, Sr., disagrees however, claiming that “drag trumps power” in the pool. In the video below, the two-time silver medalist explains, “The speed we can generate is directly proportionate to the power that we generate, but it’s inversely proportionate to the frontal drag that we create during our swimming.”

When looking at the strokes actual Olympic competitors use, the bottom line seems to be that the “best” stroke depends on the race distance and the athlete’s preference. The straight-armed deep-catch approach seems to work best for sprinting, whereas the curved-arm scull approach saves energy and creates less drag, helping some swimmers in 100-meter races and many swimmers at longer distances. Of course, individual comfort for each swimmer has to be taken into account. Several years ago superstar Michael Phelps experimented with deep-catch to better compete in 100-meter races, but he later said he wasn’t comfortable with the style and was disappointed with his performance using it.

Image courtesy of Chris 73, via Wikimedia Commons

About the Author: Larry is the associate editor of technology for Scientific American, covering a variety of tech-related topics, including biotech, computers, military tech, nanotech and robots. Follow on Twitter @lggreenemeier.

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.





Rights & Permissions

Comments 2 Comments

Add Comment
  1. 1. dpierce3 9:32 am 07/23/2012

    There are about 60 things that are part of going fast sustainably through the water. A famous coach once said about one of his Olympic Gold Medalists: “He’s perfect. He’s tall has long arms and a pointy head.” Propulsion efficiency versus energy cost is indeed the key, but as pointed out, swimmers will revert to what they are most comfortable with. “Comfortable” should include (as it no doubt does with Phelps) times,split times, body physiology measurements and video reviews over multiple swims to compare minor variations. Generally, elite swimmers have gotten taller with more disproportion of arm to leg length while maintaining large hands and feet and a tubular frame and yes, pointy heads, but I suspect we will continue to see “different strokes for different folks”.

    Link to this
  2. 2. upload70 11:51 am 10/4/2012

    based on race times and records it must be the front crawl their style of choice may depend on their limb length or comfort. http://buysteroidsuk.co/

    Link to this

Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.

More from Scientific American

Scientific American MIND iPad

Give a Gift & Get a Gift - Free!

Give a 1 year subscription as low as $14.99

Subscribe Now >>

X

Email this Article

X