ADVERTISEMENT
  About the SA Blog Network













Observations

Observations


Opinion, arguments & analyses from the editors of Scientific American
Observations HomeAboutContact

Clovis People Were Not Alone During Early Colonization of the Americas

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.


Email   PrintPrint



Paisley Caves points

Western Stemmed points from Paisley Caves date to more than 13,000 years ago--as old or older than Clovis points. Image: Jim Barlow

Once upon a time, the initial migration of humans into the New World looked like a very tidy story: the so-called Clovis people, it appeared, were the first to enter the Americas, arriving from Siberia by land bridge and spreading across the continental U.S. in pursuit of large game animals, leaving behind their telltale fluted stone tools and other remains. But in recent years, discoveries of remains that appear to pre-date the Clovis culture have upended  that Clovis First scenario. Now new findings from the Paisley Caves in Oregon join the growing body of evidence that the human colonization of the Americas was more complex than researchers once thought, showing that a separate technological tradition co-existed with the Clovis one and may well have preceded it.

Previous work at the Paisley Caves had turned up preserved human feces (coprolites) containing DNA and some stone projectile points made in what archaeologists term the Western Stemmed Tradition, which differs from Clovis primarily in the way in which the point is affixed to a dart shaft. Initial dating results indicated that the remains rivaled Clovis in age, but questions about their antiquity lingered. In the new study, published in the July 13 Science, Dennis Jenkins of the University of Oregon and his colleagues report on high-precision radiocarbon dating of more than 100 new samples from Paisley Caves that establish the chronology of the site and put the oldest stone points at more than 13,000 years old, making them at least as old as the oldest known Clovis artifacts elsewhere.

The Clovis First theory predicts that the Western Stemmed technology evolved from the Clovis one, yet no Clovis tools or tools that look like they could have given rise to Clovis have turned up in Paisley Caves. Thus although Western Stemmed might share a common ancestral technology with Clovis, it does not come out of the Clovis lineage itself, Jenkins asserted in a press teleconference. In the Science paper he and his colleagues conclude: “The Paisley Caves evidence supports the hypothesis that the [Western Stemmed Technology] was an indigenous development in the far western United States, whereas Clovis may have developed independently in the Plains and Southeast.” The findings buttress claims for a non Clovis-derived tool-making tradition at the site of Monte Verde in Chile, Jenkins added, noting “this really seems to suggest there are multiple technology trajectories at the same time here at the end of the Pleistocene in the Western Hemisphere.”

The investigators also recovered more coprolites containing mitochondrial DNA (which is maternally inherited, as opposed to nuclear DNA, which is inherited from both parents) from the site, taking precautions to ensure the samples were not contaminated with foreign DNA. Sequencing confirmed earlier work indicating that the Paisley Cave folks carried the so-called haplogroup A mitochondrial lineage that is common among Native Americans today and is thought to have originated in Asia. Team member Eske Willerslev of the University of Copenhagen said in the press teleconference that the Paisley Cave people were Asian in origin and possibly related to or ancestral to modern day Native Americans. To nail the relationship down further , he said, the researchers will need to retrieve nuclear DNA from the coprolites.

The oldest coprolite at the site was radiocarbon dated to 14,500 years ago, making it the oldest directly dated human remain in the western hemisphere and older than the oldest point from the site by more than a thousand years. Whether the person who left behind that turd made tools in the Western Stemmed fashion is unknown, but study co-author Loren Davis of Oregon State University said in a statement that the DNA from that coprolite resembles the DNA from a coprolite that is the same age as the oldest points. “They were from the same genetic group,” he said.

According to Davis, more evidence that the Western Stemmed people were as early or earlier than the Clovis people may come from the site of Coopers Ferry in western Idaho, which contains points that have been preliminarily dated to 13,200 years ago—an age that he and his colleagues are working to confirm. As for the Paisley Caves, although more archaeological material remains to be unearthed there, Jenkins has terminated the excavations in order to preserve the contents for future archaeologists armed with improved study tools and methodologies. Analyses of materials already recovered from the site will continue, however.

In 2011, archaeologists working at the Debra L. Friedkin site in Texas reported on their discovery of thousands of stone tools dating to between 13,200 and 15,500 years ago that were also distinct from Clovis points. That assemblage was found under a level containing Clovis tools, however, and researchers involved in the discovery suggested that the Clovis style of projectile manufacture may have derived from that earlier tradition. No such technological precursor is known for Western Stemmed projectiles.

Kate Wong About the Author: Kate Wong is an editor and writer at Scientific American covering paleontology, archaeology and life sciences. Follow on Twitter @katewong.

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.





Rights & Permissions

Comments 14 Comments

Add Comment
  1. 1. OperaGeo 9:08 am 07/13/2012

    Paleofeces not coprolite – you do not get DNA from coprolite.

    Link to this
  2. 2. jtrouch 9:50 am 07/13/2012

    “…Whether the person who left behind that turd made tools…” Perhaps this explains the misuse of coprolite. I prefer, in stratified situ fecal ejecta. None-the-less, this piece is a bit dated regarding the migration of the CP. Far too many findings in SA to belabor that theory any longer.

    Link to this
  3. 3. jtrouch 9:52 am 07/13/2012

    ‘stratified, in situ fecal ejecta…’

    Link to this
  4. 4. Sauce23 11:49 am 07/13/2012

    Interesting, but not shocking. Have we not learned from the “Out of Africa” hominin data that numerous nomadic radiations are to be expected from a source with a quizzing mind?

    Link to this
  5. 5. ncsmith1952 11:40 pm 07/13/2012

    As a general principle, we should always expect human history to be more complicated than we first think it to be.

    Link to this
  6. 6. jgrosay 9:50 am 07/14/2012

    A question of a lay in paleonthology: Why does this period receive the name of Clovis, that was a king of France, the first one in accepting to become christian under the influence of his wife, daughter of the king of burgundians? Pre-columbine Americas sound far away from fifth century’s Europe.

    Link to this
  7. 7. kwong 10:22 am 07/14/2012

    OperaGeo: You can, in fact, get DNA from coprolites. Slate just did a good explainer on how feces get preserved: http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/explainer/2012/07/fossilized_feces_earliest_americans_shat_in_the_perfect_cave_.html

    Sauce23: Agree–not shocking news. But important to establish the dates here.

    jgrosay: Clovis technology is named for a site in New Mexico where many of these fluted projectile points were found.

    Link to this
  8. 8. hanmeng 11:24 am 07/14/2012

    According to several books on Google, the town Clovis was so named by by the daughter of a railroad official who was studying French history.

    Link to this
  9. 9. American Muse 9:44 pm 07/16/2012

    What’s all the fuss about? We already know humans entered the Americas from Asia across the Behring land-bridge about 13-14,000 years ago, toward the end of the Pleistocene Epoch. That these humans culturally differentiated into subgroups in the Americas is not news.

    Link to this
  10. 10. gamt67 11:48 am 07/17/2012

    “left behind that turd…” REALLY!? In an popular press article are we backsliding to 14 year old teen boy language, quite a step down SI.

    Link to this
  11. 11. bab36 5:38 pm 07/18/2012

    Romance nor humor need be stripped from archaeological observation. I got a kick out of “the person who left behind that turd” comment- a welcomed laugh!

    Link to this
  12. 12. hartson 1:16 pm 07/19/2012

    If humanity is 100,000 plus years old, why would humans have not gotten to the Americas during previous ice age land bridge opportunities?

    Link to this
  13. 13. tucanofulano 5:57 pm 07/19/2012

    Africa/Europe migrations = “Clovis” and eastern half of now USA/Canada;
    Asia/Spice Islands = western half of now USA/Canada and most of South America.

    Link to this
  14. 14. oscar867 6:45 am 07/27/2012

    As I understand it, the African/European tool makers of that era made tools entirely different from Clovis. Wouldn’t Indonesia have been more accurate then Spice Islands (though not as romantic). Speaking of romance, perhaps the “new” vernacular should be “…Whether the person who ‘dropped the deuce’ made tools…”…

    Link to this

Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.

More from Scientific American

Scientific American Holiday Sale

Black Friday/Cyber Monday Blow-Out Sale

Enter code:
HOLIDAY 2014
at checkout

Get 20% off now! >

X

Email this Article

X