Subscription Center
May 16, 2012
| 
2
Most E. coli bacteria found in the body are harmless
The latest research into the genetics of the human microbiome is taking to a whole new level the old (and not always fruitful) argument about whether nature or nurture is a more important influence in our lives.
In the past few days, Science Express published a paper that demonstrated that friendly (or commensal) bacteria don’t just passively crowd out the disease-causing ones. They actively fight back after an infection by taking advantage of selective pressure to force the disease-causing germs to become less fit and eventually die off. (Of course, the bacteria don’t “know” what they’re doing in any sense of the word. It’s just that the ones who are successful at doing it survive.)
Similarly, Nature recently published an article that detailed how the microbial community living inside residents of the U.S. was not as diverse as that inside families living in Malawi or the Venezuelan Amazon. (Whether that difference has any deleterious health effects and why is another story.) (Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group.)
The point is that the microbes that live inside, on and around us all ultimately come from the environment. And these commensal bacteria shape our lives every bit as much as our genetic inheritance does. In fact, in many cases, the genes found in these microbes allow us to do something—like digest the fiber in oranges—that our own genes cannot.
The old dichotomy of nature vs. nurture is meaningless when what we think of as our nature—namely the genes that make us who we are—can come from our parents or our microbes.
Rights & Permissions
2 Comments
Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.
For Plants, Polyploidy Is Not a Four-Letter Word
Becoming an individual twin isn't about genetics or environment, but how you experience them
DSM-5: Caught between Mental Illness Stigma and Anti-Psychiatry Prejudice
Why Feeling Anxious about a Vaccine Makes It More Effective (and Other Benefits of Short-Term Stress)
USC Dornsife Scientific Diving: The 2013 Guam and Palau Expedition Begins 
Telling science stories...wait, what's a "story"?
See what we're tweeting about
BoraZ Texting for better health http://t.co/Ln3D3gAp8V by @lilyhnewman BoraZ A doctor's science writing prescription https://t.co/drvn61Ei0h BoraZ Science News: Should fructose face charges as the villain in the U.S. obesity epidemic? http://t.co/MA0l9ym0dn
YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.
Share
Email
Print
Well, the nature vs nurture debate is not really ruled out by the well known fact that microbes help us with our digestion? But do they turn us into criminals? Did Mozart have especially fantastic microbes inside him? Are there musical ones? Do microbes makes us more intelligent? Really… Undoubtedly the results are interesting, considering our diseases, and one might speculate if microbes cause or contribute to schizophrenia or depression, but the results reported certainly do not invalidate the ancient debate about nature vs nurture. We already know that we are dealing with both.
Link to thisAgreeing with Andira, I say your title is misleading. The article, while very interesting, still focuses squarely on biological aspects of human capacity and ignores effects of behavioral stimuli. How does this discovery “annihilate” the debate?
Link to this