ADVERTISEMENT
  About the SA Blog Network













Observations

Observations


Opinion, arguments & analyses from the editors of Scientific American
Observations HomeAboutContact

Oil Habit Unchanged on 2-Year Anniversary of BP’s Gulf of Mexico Spill

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.


Email   PrintPrint



burning-deepwater-horizonTwo years ago, 11 men lost their lives as a backlash of gas exploded into the night from the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig in the Gulf of Mexico. In the ensuing months, roughly 5 million barrels of oil and more than 6 billion cubic feet of natural gas spewed into the ocean from the Macondo well more than a kilometer underwater. It took the combined efforts of the U.S. government, the world’s major oil companies and, finally, a lonely hydrologist working through the night from a cellphone picture of pressure reading graphs to cap the spill on July 15, 2010.

Two years later, Gulf seafood remains suspect in consumers’ minds, despite the “sniff test.” Fishermen and scientists report an excess of deformed or sickly sea life, and more than a million barrels of spilled oil remain “missing,” likely never to be found. The Gulf’s dolphins have been dying, deepwater corals remain coated in hydrocarbons and many people involved in the clean-up complain of poor health.

It will take decades to fully reckon the toll of BP’s 2010 oil spill. In fact, science is still grappling with the after effects of the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil tanker spill. It took three years for Prince William Sound in Alaska’s herring fishery to collapse and 20 years to reach a legal settlement.

Meanwhile, an invisible leak of natural gas is ongoing in the North Sea from an offshore platform operated by French oil company Total. Oil spills occur weekly in the Niger Delta of Nigeria. And the oil industry has resumed deep water drilling in the Gulf of Mexico as well as prospecting in the melting Arctic, without adequate oversight or the resources to contain or clean up any future spills in the frigid north.

BP can and should bear legal consequence for its negligence, but the ultimate blame for the Macondo well spill falls squarely on us Americans and our way of life. We consume roughly a quarter of the world’s oil to fuel our cars, trucks and just-in-time shipping. The world consumes a barrel of oil every second. Sadly, more oil runs off U.S. parking lots after rainstorms in a year than spewed into the Gulf of Mexico from BP’s Macondo well during the three-month blow-out. Oil addiction ain’t pretty.

Image: Fire boat response crews battle the blazing remnants of the off shore oil rig Deepwater Horizon on April 21, 2010. A Coast Guard MH-65C dolphin rescue helicopter and crew document the fire, while searching for survivors. Multiple Coast Guard helicopters, planes and cutters responded to rescue the Deepwater Horizon’s 126 person crew. (U.S. Coast Guard photo)

 

David Biello About the Author: David Biello is the associate editor for environment and energy at Scientific American. Follow on Twitter @dbiello.

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.





Rights & Permissions

Comments 5 Comments

Add Comment
  1. 1. payitfwd 5:00 pm 04/20/2012

    Nothing changes the behavior of most people until something really awful happens TO THEM. Oil spills? Dead animals? Ecosystems that take decades to fix themselves? Most people are too shallow to care about any of that.

    Things will only change after a lot of cataclysmic disasters occur. Then those same selfish people will be angry that things were allowed to get to that point. What can we do?

    Link to this
  2. 2. ltdan08 10:57 pm 04/20/2012

    I feel alone in this effort, but I have been successfully boycotting BP for two years now. I have not purchased fuel or even cigarettes or refreshments from a BP since April 20, 2010.
    I only go into BP gas stations to use the bathroom, and I usually miss on purpose. I figure they could use some practice in cleaning up messes. (Joke)

    Link to this
  3. 3. Mark656515 9:32 am 04/21/2012

    Obviously, in the North Sea or in the Pre Salt, BP’s local production license would have been revoked on the next day.

    In real capitalism (as in England) there is competition among the rich, and they are held accountable the same as staff members, i.e., investors are not risk-free.

    For the ‘Other 99%’ of the US population, it would be a million times better if the US went back to real capitalism and European-style Social Democracy, and not remain an over-cushioned plutocratic oligarchy, as is the case of the US today, where everyone is afraid of the system.

    Take it from Jeferey Sachs: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=fixing-financial-crisis

    Kennedy, being a true aristocrat in the most elevated sense, had a sense of noblesse oblige – the moral obligations of the elite – and tied to be a little independent. The concept of noblesse oblige is indispensable for civilization, for all economic or bureaucratic/political elites.

    Link to this
  4. 4. Dredd 3:47 pm 04/23/2012

    It is not just the GOM that is interesting, in terms of ongoing environmental degradation.

    Methane.

    http://blogdredd.blogspot.com/2012/04/deepwater-horizon-keeps-on-killing.html

    Link to this
  5. 5. trafficproducts 11:25 pm 04/23/2012

    Oil spill and its abhorrent
    http://www.mill-industry.net

    Link to this

Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.

More from Scientific American

Scientific American Holiday Sale

Limited Time Only!

Get 50% off Digital Gifts

Hurry sale ends 12/31 >

X

Email this Article

X