ADVERTISEMENT
  About the SA Blog Network













Observations

Observations


Opinion, arguments & analyses from the editors of Scientific American
Observations HomeAboutContact

New Technology Maps the Surprising Subtleties of Childhood and Teen Obesity


Email   PrintPrint



childhood obesity map

Image courtesy of iStockphoto/prudkov

The obesity epidemic has already reached the youngest demographic: About 17 percent of U.S. children and teens are obese, and about one in three are overweight. These numbers, reflected in many other countries, have risen steadily in recent decades. And researchers are racing to find the most powerful drivers behind these scary figures, as children who carry the extra pounds into adulthood increase their risks for diabetes, heart disease and other chronic diseases.

The most basic cause—no surprise, has to do with too much unhealthful food and not enough physical activity.  Looking more closely at the roots of childhood obesity across different populations yields a complex and nuanced puzzle. Lifestyle and environmental factors that lead to obesity differ for a high schooler in the Bronx versus one in rural Alabama.

Many researchers have turned to geographic information systems (GIS) as powerful analysis tools to map this massive health problem and its possible causes. A special report, published online April 10 in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine, presents six new studies in this growing subfield, some with surprising results that could have implications for health, education and urban planning policy.

“To fully understand the multifaceted nature of childhood obesity, a geographic perspective should be considered,” Celeste Torio, of the Department of Health and Human Service’s Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, wrote in an essay published online in the same issue of American Journal of Preventive Medicine. “Many of the contributing factors to childhood obesity (particularly social, policy and environmental determinants) have place-to-place variation.”

Here’s one example. Where do you think children ages 12 to 16 years get most of their daily physical activity? Sports? Gym class? At home? The answer turns out to be largely dependent on where they live. In a study led by Daniel Rainham, of the Environmental Science Program at Dalhousie University, researchers tracked 380 adolescents for a week, using both accelerometers and GPS. They found that teens who lived in rural areas did, in fact, get most of their recommended one-hour daily moderate-to-vigorous physical activity at school. However, kids who lived in suburban and urban environments logged most of their active time getting from place to place.  And both groups got a fair amount ( 10 to 25 percent) at home.

Rainham and his colleagues also found that girls were getting more physical activity than boys, and that urban teens seemed to be getting the most overall. “Policy makers should be aware that active transportation is an important source of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity for urban youth,” they wrote. And likewise, they contend, education policies should recognize that school-day activities continue to be an important source of exercise for rural teens.

In addition to differences in physical activity, urban and rural adolescents also seem to pick different food options—even when faced with the same smattering of fast food restaurants. Researchers have continued to debate about whether proximity of fast food leads to greater levels of consumption and poorer health outcomes. But another new study, led by Lorna Fraser, of the School of Geography at the University of Nottingham in England, suggests that the culpability of a fast food burger and fries for that extra weight might depend largely on on where teens live.

The researchers measured the number of fast food establishments within one kilometer of the study participants’ homes along with each 13 to 15 year old’s obesity status and reports from caretakers about how often the teens ate at fast food joints.

Those subjects who ate more fast food meals were, predictably, more likely to be obese. Interestingly, a larger number of fast food restaurants in an urban area did not lead to increased consumption (in fact, it seemed to make teens less likely to eat there), but the trend reversed in more rural environments. The results suggest that “public health interventions that place restrictions on the location of fast food outlets may not uniformly decrease consumption,” the researchers noted.

Additional studies like these should help policy makers zero in on the most effective ways to combat childhood and teen obesity at a more fine-grained scale, allowing GIS modeling to analyze “complex reality by breaking it down into layers of information,” she wrote in her essay.

The improved spatial resolution will not provide all of the answers about how to fight childhood obesity. “GIS is not a panacea,” Stephen Matthews, of the Pennsylvania State University, noted in an essay published online in the same issue of American Journal of Preventive Medicine. “The role of place and how children interact with place is just one part of the obesity puzzle.” But she hopes that further study of the spatial environment will help provide new insights into battling childhood obesity.

Katherine Harmon Courage About the Author: Katherine Harmon Courage is a freelance writer and contributing editor for Scientific American. Her book Octopus! The Most Mysterious Creature In the Sea is out now from Penguin/Current. Follow on Twitter @KHCourage.

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.





Rights & Permissions

Comments 4 Comments

Add Comment
  1. 1. JamesDavis 9:27 am 04/10/2012

    One way you can battle childhood obesity is to build intense exercise parks in every community that will provide skateboard/rollerskating, basketball, tennis, handball, and a jogging/walking/bicycle track and put the parks in wooded areas if possible for the benefits of the inclines. Provide only machines that contain natural juices and foods that does not contain anything artificial or sugars. Mandate all schools to require their students to spend at least two hours a day after class engaging in a physical activity at the park where the buses and parents will pick them us after two hours or after the parents get off from work; if the students prefer to stay longer, community buses can take them home. Even in the winter time, the student can dress warmly and use the park.

    With help from community businesses, even hamburgers and pizzas can be made healthy and the schools can teach healthy living. The people with whom the children spend the most time has to take the first step, and that is the schools.

    Link to this
  2. 2. geojellyroll 10:27 am 04/10/2012

    “Additional studies like these should help policy makers zero in on the most effective ways to combat childhood and teen obesity at a more fine-grained scale, allowing GIS modeling to analyze “complex reality by breaking it down into layers of information”

    This is a joke, right? 3 parents in a room brainstorming for 2 hours could come up with effective solutions.

    Link to this
  3. 3. Zwitterion 9:06 pm 04/10/2012

    That is, of course, why childhood obesity is a complete non-issue for US health. Because anyone can come up with efficient solutions in a few hours.

    Link to this
  4. 4. hlahore 10:22 am 04/12/2012

    The sunshine vitamin was very nicely shown to be strongly associated with lower weight in the article mentioned as well as a second article in the same issue. First article: Only 25% of those with a good outdoor environment were overweight, vs 32% of those lacking a good outdoor environment.
    Second article: good park space strongly associated with good BMI. Associations with good park space where stronger than those with fast foods
    Details and charts at:
    http://www.vitamindwiki.com/tiki-index.php?page_id=2595

    Link to this

Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.

More from Scientific American

Scientific American MIND iPad

Give a Gift & Get a Gift - Free!

Give a 1 year subscription as low as $14.99

Subscribe Now >>

X

Email this Article

X