About the SA Blog Network



Opinion, arguments & analyses from the editors of Scientific American
Observations HomeAboutContact

Vaccine for Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Remains Safe

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

Email   PrintPrint

vaccinationBy now, you’re probably aware of the hype over a vaccine associated with these three letters: HPV. Designed to prevent people from acquiring human papillomavirus, some strains of which can lead to cervical, vulval, anal and vaginal cancer in women not to mention cancers of the anus and penis in men, the HPV vaccine has been thrust into the spotlight again during the recent debates among the GOP presidential candidates.

The controversy centers on Texas Gov. Rick Perry, who issued an executive order in 2007 that required all sixth-grade girls in his state to undergo HPV vaccination. That order has become a target for some of Perry’s opponents, who claim that the governor overstepped his boundaries by mandating the vaccine and put patients at risk of dangerous side effects. Michele Bachmann told a tale of a tearful mother who claimed her 12-year-old daughter was now mentally disabled because of the vaccine.

To date there is no research that supports a link between the HPV vaccine—or any other vaccine for that matter—and mental retardation. In the past few days, news outlets across the country have seized on the issue, debunking Bachmann’s story (from which she has subsequently backpedaled). For example, this round-up of the relevant research on vaccines and their side effects cites an August report from the Institute of Medicine that found no link between any vaccine and mental disability. Similarly, a story in the New York Times points out that the HPV vaccine has nothing to do with mental disability, saying flat-out that “there is no evidence linking it to mental retardation.” A story in the Los Angeles Times also debunked Bachmann’s claim and cited the American Academy of Pediatrics, which stated that Bachmann’s claim had “absolutely no scientific validity.” And four experts asked by to weigh in on the pros and cons of mandatory vaccination don’t all agree that it should be required, but do agree that the vaccine is safe and effective.

Scientific American also has recently covered the lack of scientific evidence linking vaccines to autism as well as the dangerous public health consequences that can follow when parents refuse to vaccinate their children.

Rights & Permissions

Comments 2 Comments

Add Comment
  1. 1. JamesDavis 7:08 am 09/15/2011

    The Republicans are always screaming that the democrats are pushing big government down our throats and government is getting too big and taking rights away from the American people and businesses are people too, and look at what Perry goes and does…injects big government and big business people, for $28,500.00, right into our children’s bodies and takes away their right to choose and make informed decisions for themselves and takes away the parent’s right to parenthood their children. “Twinkle, twinkle little republican; what you call me is what you are, but worse.”

    How come Palin didn’t scream for Bachmann to resign for talking about Palin’s mentally retarded child and grandchildren and how come Rush isn’t screaming for Bachmann to resign and leave planet Earth?

    Link to this
  2. 2. mangocats 8:17 am 09/15/2011

    If I sold my family’s home, went to a casino, bet all of my family’s assets on a longshot and won 100:1 return, I would still be branded reckless, irresponsible, and unfit to manage my family’s affairs in the future.

    In 2007 Governor Perry took a much smaller chance, but still a chance, with an unproven (on the scale of testing he mandated) vaccine, and mandated that 200,000 girls per year submit themselves as test subjects. Some of those girls did experience negative side effects from the vaccine, even if it was just an auto accident on the way to the doctor’s office to get it. In 2007, the extent of those side effects were just as unknown as the outcome of a bet in a casino.

    If pharmaceutical companies want to develop vaccines that people want to expose themselves to, fine. I agree with a statement that George Bush Sr. made about pulling out of Gulf War I without deposing Saddam Hussein, paraphrasing: would I like Hussein out of power? Of course I would! But, whose son, whose daughter would have to die to accomplish that?

    Link to this

Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a member to submit a comment.

More from Scientific American

Email this Article