ADVERTISEMENT
  About the SA Blog Network













Observations

Observations


Opinion, arguments & analyses from the editors of Scientific American
Observations HomeAboutContact

Who Are the Winners and Losers under ICANN’s New Web Site Naming Rules?

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.


Email   PrintPrint



Internet,Web,domainDomain name registries and marketers can rejoice now that the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) has given its blessing to a plan encouraging the use of much more creative Web addresses. On Monday ICANN’s Board of Directors voted to increase the number of Internet domain-name endings—called generic top-level domains (gTLDs)—from the seemingly ubiquitous .com, .net, .org and 19 other suffixes that most Web users have come to know over the past two decades.

Under this new approach—which the ICANN favored by a vote of 13 to one (with two abstentions)—Internet address names will be able to end with almost any word in any language. For example, Scientific American would be able to add Internet addresses using such gTLDs as .ScientificAmerican or .Americanscience, to direct readers to different offerings. Caveat: I am not privy to any plans that Scientific American might have to acquire new gTLDs.

In fact, it’s unclear why Scientific American or any other Web site owner would want to pay the $185,000 that may be required to mint each new Web address (plus the $25,000 annually to maintain them), other than to protect its brand identity. If some other entity were to secure the rights to .ScientificAmerican, it might confuse readers looking for the publication’s actual site. Not to mention the infinite combination of words (in multiple languages) that would need to be snatched up to likewise avoid confusion—say, .ScienceAmerican, .ScientificAmericanNews, et cetera, with one’s imagination being the only limitation.

It’s not likely that an individual or small business would invest the hundreds of thousands of dollars necessary to sow confusion around someone else’s Web site, and trademark owners would be allowed to claim their names for use in addresses during an initial period following the rollout. Still, the cybersquatting and so-called "namejacking" so common in the early days of the Web could return. Such cybersquatting involves someone registering Web site addresses containing trademarked words and names so they can be sold at a profit to the rightful owners of those trademarks and names. In one high-profile case, entertainer Madonna eventually won a cybersquatting case in 2000 against then-owner of Madonna.com Dan Parisi, who was found to have registered the domain name in bad faith (he used it as a porn site).

Domain name registrars—the largest being Go Daddy—stand to gain the most from ICANN’s decision as wallets are opened to buy up new gTLDs. Marketers will also have a field day as Web site owners spend money to get the word out about their new Web addresses, although it’s unclear how much additional traffic these more creative gTLDs will drive to their sites. "Bottom line—the new names will almost certainly mean nothing special to search engines," SearchEngineLand.com reported Monday. "Search engines like Google and Bing give no particular credit or boost to generic top level domain names in general."

Image courtesy of Dirk Ercken, via iStockPhoto.com

Tags: ,





Rights & Permissions

Comments 5 Comments

Add Comment
  1. 1. fyngyrz 5:58 pm 06/20/2011

    …and big business locks out the average citizen — again.

    Nothing to see here folks, move along.

    Link to this
  2. 2. domainname 7:22 pm 06/20/2011

    At immense cost,the ICANN released only a half dozen TLDs or so in the last 12 years and most of these were restricted/sponsored TLDs (which have all pretty much failed) – then they suddenly decide to let out 500 to 1000 "generic" gTLDs?It’s all so late in coming,far too uncompetitive(yet again)and astronomically priced.

    15 years ago the alternative roots were offering "anything"."anything" registrations which were instantly logged to the "registry".There’s no reason why we could not have the same open system in the ICANN administered DNS where an instant anything.anything domain name and TLD registration might just cost the gTLD registrant the same as a second level .com

    Link to this
  3. 3. venkatraghavang 11:41 am 06/21/2011

    ..the preponderance of cybersquatting still exists over the web and the usage of these extended/newly added gTLDs might not be attractive unless there’s some radical change that take place in the domain name registration.

    Link to this
  4. 4. rodovre 5:06 pm 06/21/2011

    I modified the local host file on my PC to filter out the new ones at the interface level, as only silly or evil companies/persons would pay 185k for a gTLD.

    Link to this
  5. 5. MolBioPhys 6:15 pm 06/22/2011

    Won’t this policy make it even more difficult to tell a legitimate website from a bogus one?

    Link to this

Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.

More from Scientific American

Scientific American Special Universe

Get the latest Special Collector's edition

Secrets of the Universe: Past, Present, Future

Order Now >

X

Email this Article

X