About the SA Blog Network



Opinion, arguments & analyses from the editors of Scientific American
Observations HomeAboutContact

Octopuses and squids are damaged by noise pollution

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

Email   PrintPrint

squid hearing damaged by ocean noise pollutionNot only can squids and octopuses sense sound, but as it turns out, these and other so-called cephalopods might be harmed by growing noise pollution in our oceans—from sources such as offshore drilling, ship motors, sonar use and pile driving.

"We know that noise pollution in the oceans has a significant impact on dolphins and whales because of the vital use of acoustic information of these species," Michel André, of the Technical University of Catalonia’s Laboratory of Applied Bioacoustics and one of the authors on the new study, said in a prepared statement. But research had yet to probe the extent to which human-made noise might be affecting other pelagic species.

Cephalopods, prevalent invertebrates in Earth’s seas, might actually be suffering life-threatening injury from loud intrusions into their marine habitats.

For instance, mass strandings of giant squid (Architeuthis dux) in 2001 and 2003 off the coast of Spain occurred while ships were in the area prospecting with compressed air guns, André and his colleagues noted in their paper, published online April 11 in Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment.

"This is the first study indicating a severe impact on invertebrates, an extended group of marine species," André said.

To examine the issue more closely in the lab, André and his team exposed common octopuses (Octopus vulgaris), European squid (Loligo vulgaris), common cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) and squid in the genius Illex to low-intensity, low-range sound (50 to 400 hertz) in short sweeps over two hours. After a period of 12 hours to four days, the researchers killed some of the subjects and examined them under light microscopes, scanning electron microscopes and transmission electron microscopes.

They found some rather striking damage. In the statocyst, the compartment responsible for spatial orientation and hearing, the researchers found large lesions, missing or damaged hairs and ruptured plasma membranes.

"If the relatively low intensity, short exposure used in our study can cause such severe acoustic trauma, then the impact of continuous, high intensity noise pollution in the oceans would be considerable," André said. "For example, we can predict that, since the statocyst is responsible for balance and spatial orientation, noise-induced damage to this structure would likely affect the cephalopod’s ability to hunt, evade predators and even reproduce."

Even in fish and marine mammals that have been studied more closely, low- and mid-intensity noise has not been shown to cause such severe damage.

The findings "indicate that the deleterious effects of marine noise pollution go well beyond those observed in whales and dolphins," the researchers noted. And for cephalopods, the injury might "not be compatible with life," André noted.

If increased low-frequency noise pollution has the same impact on octopuses and their brethren in the open ocean, the resulting changes in cephalopod health and populations could have a substantial impact on entire ocean food webs—not just calamari supplies.

Image of common squid courtesy of Wikimedia Commons/Hans Hillewaert

Rights & Permissions

Comments 1 Comment

Add Comment
  1. 1. kwinkunks 8:54 am 04/13/2011

    Thanks for the interesting post. I’m a geophysicist working in the oil and gas industry, so I’ve seen some of this type of research before. It’s important and useful, because it can help us reduce any harmful effects of seismic surveys. For example, we can be sensitive about where and when surveys are conducted, how the programme is managed, what frequencies are used, even how the energy is directed.

    However, this sort of research is very hard to do. For example, it’s surprisingly difficult to measure or model how sound is propagated under the sea, because it’s a function of, among other things, bathymetry, temperature, salinity, and currents — all dynamic and often poorly constrained parameters. So we don’t really know what the noise-scape is like underwater. It’s also not well known how animals perceive these sounds, which is relevant because it’s also not known how they react to them. Most (but not all) marine mammals swim away from sounds they don’t like. Obviously, this is undesirable effect too, but it does mean they probably avoid tissue damage.

    Unfortunately I can’t access the research paper. Trying not to be too biased, just healthily skeptical, I did wonder: Did they use a control group for diagnosing the cause of the lesions and hair loss? And if untreated, what were the effects of this damage on animal behaviour? Also, was there any healing?

    As a footnote, and a slightly cheeky one, I always found it a little ironic that the research I was interested in was not entirely in the best interests of the animals concerned. The idea was chiefly to reduce the impact of seismic surveys on marine mammals in the Arctic — so that they could be slaughtered by the aboriginal communities in the area. Another story perhaps…

    Link to this

Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a member to submit a comment.

More from Scientific American

Email this Article