About the SA Blog Network



Opinion, arguments & analyses from the editors of Scientific American
Observations HomeAboutContact

NASA’s scrapped Ares 1 rocket could be resurrected for commercial spaceflight

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

Email   PrintPrint

Conception of the Liberty rocketWhen President Obama proposed in 2010 that NASA abandon the line of Ares rockets it was developing to return astronauts to the moon, many feared that U.S. manned spaceflight was going back to square one.

It now appears that some of the groundwork laid in planning and testing one of those canceled rockets may be put to good use. Obama has proposed that the commercial-spaceflight industry step in for NASA, which instead of directing the assembly and operation of its own rockets would hire private companies as space taxi operators to ferry astronauts to orbit. As numerous firms assemble bids to deliver launch services to NASA, Ares technology has been resurrected as part of a proposed U.S.–European hybrid rocket called Liberty.

The first stage of the rocket, built by the American aerospace firm ATK, would be based on the Ares 1 rocket that was in development and testing when Obama effectively pulled the plug on the program. (Ares 1, in turn, was based on components from the space shuttle, as depicted above.) A prototype rocket called Ares 1-X completed a successful flight test in 2009. The second stage of Liberty, a version of the engine that powers the European Space Agency’s Ariane 5 rockets, would come from the European firm Astrium.

The crew capsule that would ride atop those two rocket stages remains unspecified, but Liberty would have enough muscle to carry any capsule now in the works, according to a February 8 press release from ATK:

Liberty would be a two stage launcher able to deliver 44,500 pounds to the International Space Station orbit, which would give it a launch capability to carry any crew vehicle in development. Both stages were designed for human-rating since inception and would enable unmatched crew safety. Since Liberty uses qualified, proven, and reliable systems, the team has planned an initial flight by the end of 2013, a second test flight in 2014, and operational capability in 2015.

ATK and Astrium are going after funds from NASA’s Commercial Crew Development Program, which is meant to kickstart the commercial spaceflight industry in the hopes of expediting a replacement for the space shuttle, set to retire later this year. Among several other companies pursuing funds from the same program is the start-up firm SpaceX, led by PayPal co-founder Elon Musk, which tested its Falcon 9 rocket and Dragon capsule in December.

Liberty diagram: ATK/PR Newswire


Rights & Permissions

Comments 4 Comments

Add Comment
  1. 1. lamorpa 2:28 pm 02/9/2011

    Ground control to Major Bom…

    Link to this
  2. 2. r2vettes 10:12 pm 02/9/2011

    Wait….there’s something that’s missing here. The plug is pulled on NASA, the Tevatron and so many more programs that are vital to our scientific survival. But wait….the president clearly said he was committed to the advancement of our science and technology in his state of the Union address. Maybe I didn’t hear that at all?

    Link to this
  3. 3. wfitz1964 4:35 pm 02/10/2011

    I think this is a great idea. If we are truly pushing for private comanpies to supply the space station this sounds like a viable approach. The Europeans have the proven second stage and would be happy to sell some of it products in our market. It would also help the US part particularly ATK which has lost out to the cancellation of Constellation & Ares ! . The next question capsule whose should go on top ? If it was designed for universal acceptance of any crew cabin and configuration this would work out well. The next question is where would it be launched from and how would components get to the launch sit etc etc. I feel its a good start.

    Link to this
  4. 4. bucketofsquid 5:02 pm 02/10/2011

    The president is keeping the strategic control with the feds and handing out the day to day work to private contractors. This is what the Republicans have always wanted and makes sense from an economic point of view. Our tax dollars will go to successful companies that provide working gear and a lot more research will get done by nontax sources in the hopes that they can cash in on the contracts if what they develop works. It gives us more bang (or lift as it were) for the buck.

    Personally, I’m rooting for Elon Musk.

    Link to this

Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a member to submit a comment.

More from Scientific American

Email this Article