About the SA Blog Network



Opinion, arguments & analyses from the editors of Scientific American
Observations HomeAboutContact

Can fermenting microbes save us from climate change?

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

Email   PrintPrint

Clostridium-ljungdahlii Just as bacteria and fungi are methodically breaking down the millions of gallons of oil spewing into the Gulf of Mexico, microbes might help us with another uncontrolled emission due to human activity—carbon dioxide.

An anaerobic bacteria by the name of Clostridium ljungdahlii can ferment everything from sugars to simple mixtures of carbon dioxide and hydrogen—or even carbon monoxide and hydrogen (otherwise known as syngas). Keeping these bacteria away from oxygen (which could be toxic for them) when far from its home environment of chicken yard waste is a challenge of course, but industrial bioreactors might be one solution.

So German microbiologists have gone ahead and sequenced its genome—all 4.6 million base pairs (roughly 1/1000th the size of the human genome or more than four times the size of the synthetic genome created by scientists at the J. Craig Venter Institute). Turns out that C. ljungdahlii has a unique way of eating such simple hydrocarbon mixes—it involves reducing iron-sulfur proteins—and turning them into ethanol for growth. That unique method may make it easier to introduce foreign genes that can tune the CO2-transforming cellular production machinery to make the end product desired. For example, the German scientists showed how to insert genes to make C. ljungdahlii make butanol instead of ethanol.

"The synthesis capabilities of C. ljungdahlii from CO and CO2 are not limited to biofuels, but can be expanded to virtually every compound for which biological pathways exist or will be newly constructed," the researchers write in the June 28 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, in which they unveil the genome. "This unique biotechnological approach will reduce dependency on crude oil, will fulfill industrial needs and, by doing so, could contribute to reducing the atmospheric greenhouse effect."

In fact, this could result in fuels that actually consume as much or more CO2 than they release back into the atmosphere (as long as the hydrogen isn’t produced by cracking natural gas or a similar CO2-intensive method). Such efforts are not confined to one scientific team, of course, or even one bug. The list of candidates is long: Acetobacterium woodii, Desulfobacterium autotrophicum, Methanosarcina barkeri, Moorella thermoacetica, or the tweaked Eschericia coli currently churning out diesel for the company LS9. In fact, the list of companies pursuing microbiological approaches to carbon neutral fuel and chemical production is nearly as long: Coskata, INEOS Bio, LanzaTech, Qteros among others.

Regardless of what human tinkering does to them, such CO2 eaters are likely to find favorable conditions in coming years as concentrations of the greenhouse gas rise inexorably, thanks to the current human habit to burn fossil fuels.

Of course, there is another set of microbes that can address CO2 quite well, as well—algae (and other microscopic plants). Companies, scientists and even government agencies are pursuing that avenue as well (from Solazyme to DARPA) but so is nature. Eventually vast blooms of the single-celled plants might restore the planet to some semblance of the present climate. After all, that’s why we enjoy an atmosphere with a nice comfortable amount of oxygen for us: 21 percent. Unfortunately getting back to the the current climate (which has been optimal for the emergence of human civilization) after a catastrophic climate change is likely to take the mighty microbes millions of years, at least.

Mankind may have started this climate change but it is algae that will finish it, like all the others. Indeed the meek—minute microbes—will inherit the Earth, one way or the other.

Rights & Permissions

Comments 5 Comments

Add Comment
  1. 1. quincykim 6:09 pm 06/29/2010

    I’ve been hearing about microbes that can solve all kinds of problems for a few years now. Though I understand the idea and still think they show promise, articles like this are both encouraging and frustrating, because I’m not aware of any ability to scale the process to a useful level for the big issues.

    Link to this
  2. 2. jtdwyer 7:46 pm 06/29/2010

    As I understand, most of the ocean’s microbial life is currently cooperating in a CO2 recycling program, without human reengineering, thank you. Please see:

    Link to this
  3. 3. protchemdgm 10:04 am 06/30/2010

    At least there are companies, such as "Coskata, INEOS Bio, LanzaTech, Qteros among others", that are trying to scale-up the carbon neutral production of fuel and chemicals. Based on my experience I imagine one or more of them will develop a "process to a useful level for the big issues".

    Link to this
  4. 4. tiurlumphd 6:41 am 07/2/2010

    i think germany scientist just wasting his time, buffer,DNA sequencer,etc.,just to sequence this bacteria genomic (Clostridium ljungdahlii ).logically algae and plants do the process of cooling down climate..yeah i know they have a lot of money for forchung. i wish you could grant me the chance also..vielen dank…

    Link to this
  5. 5. eco-steve 7:01 pm 07/20/2010

    Rather than mucking about with genes, just Pyrolyse biomass and/or hydrocarbons to get biofuels cheaply. The technology exists now (see and is far faster and simpler a process. Why try to reinvent the wheel? People used wood pyrolysers to get fuels for decades. But today the method has been scientifically optimised and developped. All that is required now is an increased rate of investment.

    Link to this

Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a member to submit a comment.

More from Scientific American

Email this Article