Subscription Center
May 16, 2010
| 
10
Researchers have devised a way to fabricate tiny electrodes from glass, harnessing a phenomenon by which nanoscale glass walls can be transformed from insulators to conductors and back again. At larger scales, that phenomenon, known as "dielectric breakdown," leads to excess heating and structural damage, but at the nanoscale the process appears to be harmless and reversible.
Sanghyun Lee of the Pohang University of Science and Technology in South Korea and Ran An and Alan Hunt of the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor announced their finding in a paper published online May 16 in Nature Nanotechnology, along with a prototype application in what may be the smallest man-made pump in existence. (Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group.)
Using lasers, the group machined glass channels just 600 nanometers wide onto a substrate. (A nanometer is one billionth of a meter.) Two electrolyte-filled channels were placed end to end, with a thin glass wall separating them. Ordinarily the wall would serve as a dam, blocking the flow of both electrolyte and electric current.
But dielectric breakdown, induced by extreme electric fields, can change that, allowing current to pass through the glass wall even though the wall remains structurally intact and continues to prevent electrolyte flow. The researchers found that at such small scales, even an electric potential of 10 volts would suffice to transform the glass insulator into a conducting electrode. And the heat accompanying dielectric breakdown, which can fry larger devices, dissipates so quickly on the nanoscale that the glass structure appears to suffer no permanent damage.
As a demonstration, the authors fabricated a fluid pump using one of their glass electrodes to drive flows on the smallest scales, on the order of a quadrillionth of a liter per second. The pump makes use of electroosmosis, whereby electricity pushes fluids along—in this case from one end of the pump to the other. The heart of the device is just four microns across—roughly the size of a red blood cell, the authors note—although the plumbing leading into and out of the pump extends much farther. (A micron is 1,000 nanometers, or one millionth of a meter.)
"Although smaller pumps exist in nature (for example, ion pumps)," the authors wrote, "to the best of our knowledge this is the smallest pump of any kind ever fabricated and integrated onto a microchip de novo."
Image credit: Alan Hunt/Sanghyun Lee
10 Comments
Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.
What Rational Really Means
Is It Quantum Computing or Not?
Bush-crow diaries: Settling in with the Borana
Is Homosexuality Natural? Yes. So is male lactation.
Why Barns Are Red, and More - The Countdown, Episode 22 
Bora's Picks (May 17th, 2013)
See what we're tweeting about
robinlloyd99 Economic Recovery, Made in Bangladesh? http://t.co/3f5M3UcEV7
sciammind Why Do Top Athletes Suddenly Develop the Yips --a Tendency to Choke under Pressure? http://t.co/pAJIi1TEEZ
notscientific Your weekend reading from #SciLogs: Science Seeker Awards, The Conversation UK, Endlings, Hopeful Monsters http://t.co/oIoprNGqRK
YES! Send me a free issue of Scientific American with no obligation to continue the subscription. If I like it, I will be billed for the one-year subscription.
Share
Email
Print
Are molecular pumps that could capture greenhouse gases close to being developed? Might that happen in the next 25-50 years?
Link to thisLet’s hope that Global Warming doesn’t cause permanent damage before that.
Link to thisWhat is a "quadrillionth" of a liter? It appears that British and American lingo is different here.
Link to thisHow much is a "quadrillionth"? Seems that British and American definitions are different.
Link to thisone quadrillionth of a liter is the same as a femtoliter, or 10^-15 liter.
Link to thisThanks! I suggest that in the future femtoliter be used to avoid confusion, with the addition of 10^-15.
Link to this30 years ago, "top world scientists" published an article of the impending doom of "Global Cooling", yes, you read this correctly. Complete with charts, graphs,etc. Global warming is a hoax and a idiotic philosophy believed by the un-informed. Please ask me to post the article.
Link to thisDon’t bother posting the article, there’s no such thing as global warming because there’s no "globe." The earth is flat, everyone knows that.
Link to thisDont throw me in with the neigh-sayers and the "flat earthers". Let me re-iterate for the common thick headed. Theres no global warming, because it IS the planet were talking about and not the spherical object that sits on a liberal desk nestled in the hot air leaking out of their mouth.
Link to thisHiding some ‘values’ problems behind the rejection of scientific fact, are we?
Link to this