ADVERTISEMENT
  About the SA Blog Network













Observations

Observations


Opinion, arguments & analyses from the editors of Scientific American
Observations HomeAboutContact

Hexapod robot moves in the right direction by controlling chaos

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.


Email   PrintPrint



Max Planck, robotGiven that robots generally lack muscles, they can’t rely on muscle memory (the trick that allows our bodies to become familiar over time with movements such as walking or breathing) to help them more easily complete repetitive tasks. For autonomous robots, this can be a bit of a problem, since they may have to accommodate changing terrain in real time or risk getting stuck or losing their balance.

One way around this is to create a robot that can process information from a variety of sensors positioned near its "legs" and identify different patterns as it moves, a team of researchers report Sunday in Nature Physics. (Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group.)

Some scientists rely on small neural circuits called "central pattern generators" (CPG) to create walking robots that are aware of their surroundings. One of the challenges is that the robot typically needs a separate CPG for each leg in order to sense obstacles and take the appropriate action (such as stepping around a chair leg or over a rock).

Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience researcher Poramate Manoonpong and Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization researcher Marc Timme are leading a project that has created a six-legged robot with one CPG that can switch gaits depending upon the obstacles it encounters. The robot does this by manipulating the sensor inputs into periodic patterns (rather than chaotic ones) that determine its gait. In the future, the robot will also be equipped with a memory device that will enable it to complete movements even after the sensory input ceases to exist.

© Poramate Manoonpong and Marc Timme, University of Goettingen and Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization

 

Tags:





Rights & Permissions

Comments 5 Comments

Add Comment
  1. 1. hotblack 1:45 pm 01/17/2010

    Sweet old Dell Axim! I used to have one of those. That thing was a little powerhouse.

    Link to this
  2. 2. AMOS 7:32 pm 01/17/2010

    Robot

    Link to this
  3. 3. mikecimerian 11:35 pm 01/17/2010

    What an outrageous title, "controlling chaos". If it is computable then it is isn’t chaos. Telling apart data from artifact in a operational context isn’t controlling chaos.

    Chaos is an intuitive concept dating back to Greek philosophy and holds an homocentric point of view.

    Being blind to discrete states doesn’t disprove their existence. The whole concept of chaos is recessive since we function within bounderies.

    Wild claim again.

    Link to this
  4. 4. mikecimerian 11:36 pm 01/17/2010

    What an outrageous title, "controlling chaos". If it is computable then it isn’t chaos. Telling apart data from artifact in a operational context isn’t controlling chaos.

    Chaos is an intuitive concept dating back to Greek philosophy and holds an homocentric point of view.

    Being blind to discrete states doesn’t disprove their existence. The whole concept of chaos is recessive since we function within bounderies.

    Wild claim again.

    Link to this
  5. 5. JackJohnson 11:28 pm 01/19/2010

    "If it is computable then it isn’t chaos."

    Um, no. Chaos, *as defined mathematically* is inherent in some functions and can be reached via algorithms quite easily. Randomness, however, can’t be.

    That being said, I agree the title is misleading (though this is science reporting, so what’s new?). Their robot exploits chaos as a component step in the control system; it is not ‘controlling’ it in any sense of the word.

    Link to this

Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.

More from Scientific American

Scientific American Holiday Sale

Give a Gift &
Get a Gift - Free!

Give a 1 year subscription as low as $14.99

Subscribe Now! >

X

Email this Article

X