ADVERTISEMENT
  About the SA Blog Network













Observations

Observations


Opinion, arguments & analyses from the editors of Scientific American
Observations HomeAboutContact

In the Swiss Army knife of the brain, the ability to recognize faces may be a specialized tool

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.


Email   PrintPrint



Some people seem to have it all, mentally speaking—strong math and verbal skills, a keen memory and good spatial sense. This gift could be chalked up to good "generalist genes," or genes that affect many cognitive abilities and, broadly speaking, determine intelligence. The downside of generalist genes is that, because their functions overlap, someone who falters at understanding algebra may also be more likely to have trouble learning a foreign language.

But good news for Mensa rejects comes in a study published in the January 7 issue of Current Biology. Scientists identified the first high-level cognitive skill—the ability to recognize faces—that is independent of IQ-related skills. By studying pairs of identical and fraternal twins, the researchers found that, unlike cognitive abilities such as verbal and spatial understanding, the inheritance of facial recognition does not correlate with IQ inheritance.

The finding supports a Swiss Army knife metaphor for the mind, says Jia Liu, a neuroscientist at Beijing Normal University in China and lead author of the study. According to this thinking, the mind is a general-purpose tool that handles IQ-related skills and lower level tasks such as reacting to a stimulus, but that also has specialized tools. One of these, Liu’s study suggests, is facial recognition. As he points out, the ability to distinguish a friend from a stranger is a fundamental skill for social animals like humans. There are, however, shades of gray in that some people can recognize strangers, for example, better than others.

To study the inheritance of facial recognition ability, Liu’s group worked with 102 pairs of identical twins and 71 pairs of fraternal twins that were recruited from elementary and middle schools in Beijing. Because identical twins have the same genome while fraternal twins share 50 percent of their genes, hereditary traits such as IQ are more likely to be similar among identical than fraternal twins. But traits like IQ still vary among identical twins because they are also influenced by environmental factors.

By conducting a facial recognition test, Liu’s group found that the ability to recognize faces was also more similar among identical than fraternal twins and, thus, hereditary. For this experiment, participants first looked at black-and-white pictures of 20 different faces on a computer screen for 1 second per image. Then, in the test trial, the researchers showed the participants 10 of these faces intermixed with 20 new faces and asked them to identify the ones they had already seen. Thirty-seven percent of the pairs of identical twins had the same score in this test, compared with only 5 percent of fraternal twin pairs

The researchers took into account the ability of participants to recognize other types of images. Additional series of tests were done where participants were asked to remember pictures of either inverted or misaligned faces. Even though these images have the same visual content as unaltered faces, they are not recognized as faces. Liu’s group found no difference between the ability of identical and fraternal twins to recognize these images, indicating that it is the ability to recognize faces, not just visual images, which is hereditary.

To determine if facial recognition ability is inherited under the same umbrella as intelligence-related traits, the researchers tested the intelligence of the participants using a popular multiple-choice IQ test called the Raven’s Matrices. Liu’s team found that the pairs of twins that shared similar IQs were in many cases not the same pairs that shared facial recognition ability.

Because facial recognition is inherited independently of the IQ-related cognitive skills, the authors suggest that specialist, rather than generalist, genes are responsible for this skill.  "This finding raises the question of what other specific cognitive abilities are independently heritable," they wrote. Because children with autism can have normal IQs, Liu thinks that autism disorders might be controlled by specialist genes. Other candidates for specialized cognitive abilities are dyslexia and certain aspects of language comprehension, the latter of which Liu’s group plans to study next.

The image shows two of the unaltered and inverted face pictures that were used in the facial recognition test. The image is courtesy of Zhu et al., State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning





Rights & Permissions

Comments 4 Comments

Add Comment
  1. 1. Brett Rabe 1:29 pm 01/7/2010

    In the article, Storrs writes: "Because identical twins have the same genome while fraternal twins share 50 percent of their genes…."

    I’m confused. Identical twins obviously have the same genome (minus epigenetic modification, of course). But fraternal twins may have anywhere from 0 to 100% of the same genes (with presumably a bell curve around 50%), since they could receive anything from the same genes from each parent to completely different genes from each parent (as compared to the other twin). Other than random chance, there’s simply no guiding force as to how much genome they share because each one comes from a completely separate egg/sperm combination.

    So you can’t simply say fraternal twins share 50% of their genes; it’s just not correct. Perhaps I don’t understand correctly how genes are inherited, but I think a more accurate way to say it would likely be "on average, fraternal twins share about 50% of their genes."

    Apologies if that’s nitpicking. It just struck me as … wrong.

    Link to this
  2. 2. kjweber 2:57 pm 01/7/2010

    Dizygotic, or fraternal, twins come from two different eggs. They are basically like any other two siblings. The difference is that they happen to be born at the same time because the mother ovulates more than once per menstrual cycle and two eggs get fertilized. Fraternal twins, have 50% of their genome in common, just like all other siblings. The exception, of course, being monozygotic twins who share 100%. As far as the study goes, it’s good to know that other avenues of judging intellect are being explored; too much consideration is given to IQ. I love the "good news for Mensa rejects" remark. Hilarious.

    Link to this
  3. 3. Joe B 10:00 pm 01/8/2010

    Brett Rabe – You are absolutely correct. "… fraternal twins may have anywhere from 0 to 100% of the same genes (with presumably a bell curve around 50%)…".
    As you can imagine, the chances of finding fraternal twins with close to zero genes in common is fairly low and this issue is further controlled by the fact that multiple sets of twins are used, bring the average in the fraternal groups closer to the center of the bell curve.
    Don’t apologize for nitpicking, sometimes the "Fact" that everyone knows is just not so. And sometime, the difference is important. Not here though. Ha Ha.

    Link to this
  4. 4. drewiebennz 3:38 am 01/13/2010

    I’m sorry, but I’m confused. Are all identical twins monozygotic and all fraternal twins dizygotic? If that is the case, and all fraternal twins come from 2 different eggs fertilized by 2 different sperms, why do fraternal twins share 50% of the same genome. In other words, what makes dizygotic twins different from two siblings other than being fertilized at the same time?

    Thank you for your help. :-)

    Link to this

Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.

More from Scientific American

Scientific American Special Universe

Get the latest Special Collector's edition

Secrets of the Universe: Past, Present, Future

Order Now >

X

Email this Article

X