About the SA Blog Network

Not bad science

Not bad science

New discoveries in animal behavior and cognition
Not bad science Home

Homosexuality in Female Beetles, and What We Can Learn from It

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

Email   PrintPrint

With the historic supreme court hearings this week, there has been much discussion about homosexuality*. One of the ‘arguments’ that you often hear from the anti-gay rights side is that being gay isn’t natural. Evidence from the animal kingdom would refute this however, as same-sex behaviour is common and found in many different animals.

There’s the famous example of ‘Roy’ and ‘Silo’, two male chinstrap penguins that formed a pair bond and raised a chick (‘Tango’) together, later turned into a distinctive children’s book (you can also read about their tragic breakup here – this part has yet to be made into a children’s book).

Homosexuality is also common in many insects, and some flour beetle males actually mate 50% of the time with other males. But why does same-sex behaviour occur? How is it maintained by evolution? This is a complex question, and the answer is likely to differ from species to species. For example, flour beetle males that mate with other males can actually transfer to females this way. Other male insects like weevils or fruit flies may just not realise that the individual they’re mating with is also a male (it being better to mate with more animals, and get it ‘wrong’ sometimes, than be too discriminating and miss out on potentially fruitful mating attempts). However, in addition to specific cases, there may also be overarching patterns across species in how homosexuality is selected for and maintained by evolution.

A female pair of Laysan albatross

A female pair of Laysan albatross

While many studies have concentrated on male-male sexual behaviour, females also engage in same-sex behaviour. Laysan albatrosses form female-female partnerships, performing the same mating rituals as in male-female pairs of this species, and these couples can last a lifetime.


Many female animals show behaviours towards other females that they wouldn’t normally direct towards males. This produces a quandary for the scientists studying them, as such behaviours can’t be explained by the females making a ‘mistake’ in thinking it was a male.

For example, in the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus, females mount other females in the same way that the males of this species mount the females. As the females of this species do not normally do this to males, why might they do this to females?

The eggs of the seed beetle (C. maculatus) on cowpea and azuki

C. maculatus is a pest to humans found almost world-wide as it’s hitched lifts across the globe on the beans that we eat. When a female wants to reproduce, she lays her eggs on the surface of beans. When the larvae hatch, they burrow into the bean and hang out inside there for a while together, eating away at the bean, and altogether having a jolly good time. The male adults then emerge from the beans before the females, and patrol the area waiting for them. Once the females emerge, the males mate with all of them. On a side-note, males of this species have spines on their penis that cause serious damage to the females, and so the females kick the males during mating to try to keep it as short as possible (although no one has suggested this as a reason for the prevalence of female-female sexual behaviour in this species).

male-female mating in the seed beetle (Photo: F. Champion de Crespigny)

To work out why females might mount other females, the researchers compared the tendency of brother and sister beetles to mount other females. They found that, although males tended to mount females more often than the females did, families where the males mounted more females also had females that mounted more females. In other words, females engaged in more same-sex behaviour when their brothers were also more sexually active with regard to this particular behaviour.

This relationship in mounting behaviour between brothers and sisters indicates that there could be the same genes underlying this behaviour in both sexes. Genes for behaviours can often correlate between males and females of a species, when it’s not too costly for the the other sex to have them. In this case, females that mount other females more do not suffer any negative consequences compared to females that don’t (they have just as high reproductive success). Therefore, there would be no selection against females having this behaviour, and indeed those that mount more may produce sons that also mount more, and produce more offspring.

Whether this mechanism exists in other species is yet to be seen, but this study will help stimulate further studies and research into this intriguing question.




Main paper discussed:

Burgevin, L., Friberg, U., & Maklakov, A. A. (2013). Intersexual correlation for same-sex sexual behaviour in an insect. Animal Behaviour 85: 759-762.

Other references:

Aiken, R. B. 1981. The relationship between body-weight and homosexual mounting in Palmacorixa-nana Walley (Heteroptera, Corixidae). Florida Entomologist, 64, 267-271.

Edvardsson, M. & Tregenza, T. 2005. Why do male Callosobruchus maculatus harm their mates? Behavioral Ecology 16(4): 788-793.

Harari, A. R., Brockmann, H. J. & Landolt, P. J. 2000. Intrasexual mounting in the beetle Diaprepes abbreviatus (L.). Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 267, 2071-2079.

Serrano, J. M., Castro, L., Toro, M. A. & Lopez-Fanjul, C. 2000. Inter- and intraspecific sexual discrimination in the flour beetles Tribolium castaneum and Tribolium confusum. Heredity, 85, 142-146.


Photo credits:

Cover of And Tango Makes Three, published by Simon & Schuster.

Laysan albatross pair: Eric VanderWerf

beetle eggs on cowbeans: Richard001

Seed beetle mating photo: F. Champion de Crespigny

Beetles for marriage equality: Cole Eskridge


* On a slightly unrelated note, see this interesting article on the psychological roots of attitudes to same-sex marriage and other beliefs.




Felicity Muth About the Author: Felicity Muth is an early-career researcher with a PhD in animal cognition. Follow on Twitter @notbadscience.

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

Rights & Permissions

Comments 5 Comments

Add Comment
  1. 1. geojellyroll 5:52 pm 03/31/2013

    I rarely hear anyone say Homosexuality isn’t natural in the scientific sense. I hear some say it isn’t natural in the moral sense. Not a scientific concept.

    With over a million species of insects, we could also find examples of murder, cannabalism, infanticide, etc. Lots of behaviors occur. They don’t really shed much light on anything to do with humans. Too many other socio-biologic variables to weigh.

    The right or wrong of human homosexuality has nothing to do with science. It occurs and therefore it exists.

    Link to this
  2. 2. julia smith 5:55 pm 03/31/2013

    It is undisputable that nature developed sex as a means for procreation. Now gender ideologists try to convince us that homosexual sex is on a par with heterosexual sex. I am not at all against homosexuality. But I am against manipulation.

    Link to this
  3. 3. littleredtop 7:22 pm 03/31/2013

    It would appear that homosexuality is now rampant in the insect world, a fact that few of us have paid much attention to. From cockroaches to mosquitoes, they’re all indiscriminately breeding with anything that will stand still long enough to be mounted. That behavior was believed to be a phenomena common only among the Bonobo monkey population where the Bonobos are continuously copulating with each other regardless of sexual orientation, age or standing in the Bonobo community. What researchers have found interesting is that the Bonobos seem to be the best adjusted and happiest of the animal kingdom, and I must admit that I’ve never found an unhappy cockroach. Is there a correlation? Could this be a lesson for humanity? Perhaps its time for mankind to throw away all of those old taboos, laws and religious beliefs and follow the lead of our furry ancestors.

    Link to this
  4. 4. rshoff 12:45 pm 04/1/2013

    While it is true that homosexuality in nature doesn’t address morality, morality is a human construct and is extremely self-serving. It’s also true that homosexuality has not harmed the human animal’s ability to reproduce. There are over 7 billion humans alive on this earth today. Homosexuality should be a non-issue. We are all human animals, and we should all be disgusted enough by that fact alone.

    Link to this
  5. 5. Pan Eliot 3:37 am 04/2/2013

    I do agree that homosexuality should not be an issue (under normal conditions), however the other side to all this that nobody is talking about (here at least) is the harmful artificial chemicals are pumped into our environment (food, water, packaging etc.) in-particular endocrine disrupters (or artificial/environmental oestrogen’s such as BPA and phthalates). Today these chemicals are rampant in our environment and have been proven to be having a serious consequences for our ecosystems and animals all over the planet. Under such conditions as these one could say homosexuality is very much unnatural and the result of an unruly eugenics program infecting our entire planet. This is a serious issue we can not afford to ignore! But with all of that aside i might recommend free love as a solution on this planet

    Link to this

Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a member to submit a comment.

More from Scientific American

Email this Article