ADVERTISEMENT
  About the SA Blog Network













Life, Unbounded

Life, Unbounded


Discussion and news about planets, exoplanets, and astrobiology
Life, Unbounded Home

Dance of the Exoplanets


Email   PrintPrint



Fomalhaut and Fomalhaut b (inset) Hubble imagery (Credit: NASA, ESA, and P. Kalas (University of California, Berkeley and SETI Institute))

It’s been an exciting few days for exoplanetary science. A slew of refined statistical measurements of the abundance of other worlds have made it clearer than ever that our galaxy is crammed with planets.

One in six stars should host at least one Earth-sized object in an orbit smaller than that of Mercury, implying that in total there are tens of billions of planets this size across the Milky Way.

But for me one of the most exciting announcements has come from new observations of the Fomalhaut system, a ‘mere’ 25 light years from us. Fomalhaut is a star some ninety percent more massive than the Sun and only a few hundred million years into its time as a hydrogen burning ‘main-sequence’ object.

Back in 2008 Hubble Space Telescope imagery confirmed that not only is Fomalhaut surrounded by a remarkable hoop-like structure of dusty material – encircling this system at more than 120 times the distance of the Earth from the Sun – but revealed that an object possibly of Jupiter size is orbiting at the apparent inner edge of this hoop.

This was quite a claim. It made this planet, Fomalhaut b, one of a mere handful of worlds directly imaged (as opposed to being detected indirectly as the majority of exoplanets are). It also raised a huge question – how could such a planet be on such an enormously large orbit, more than 4 or 5 times further out from its star than Neptune is in our solar system?

The Fomalhaut system in context - comparing to the solar system (Credit: NASA/ESA/A. Feild STScI)

For nature to build a planet in situ at these distances confounds many of our theories about planet formation. The problem was exacerbated by the estimates of the shape of the orbit that suggested it was relatively circular – indicating that the planet had not been flung to this position by earlier dynamical jostling with other planets.

It was indeed puzzling. My colleague Kristen Menou and I had recently prepared a paper where we estimated the rate at which astronomers might expect to find such large worlds on such distant orbits from their stars. The mechanism for their placement that we simulated was an earlier episode of intense gravitational interaction between the original planets around such a star. If planets form efficiently (and they certainly seem to do so) they can start off crammed into the orbital space close to their parent star. But this can result in dramatic gravitational instability, the systems are dynamically ‘hot’. To cool down they collide, eject, and fling planets onto larger orbits.

Dynamical cooling - close packed circular orbits (left) evolve to extended elliptical orbits with fewer planets over millions to tens of millions of years (C. Scharf)

There was a snag though. Our simulations, along with those from another group working on this problem led by Dimitri Veras, indicated that the remnants of such chaos – planets on large orbits – should also have highly non-circular, strongly elliptical orbits. Fomalhaut b did not seem to fit this pattern.

Flash forward to this week. The most recent Hubble imagery of Fomalhaut b, combined with the passage of time and an opportunity to refine the measurements of Fomalhaut b’s orbital path, now suggests that its orbit is in fact elliptical. At its closest passage to its parent star this giant world is estimated to be a ‘mere’ 4.6 billion miles away. At its furthest it reaches about 27 billion miles. Running these numbers indicates an orbital ellipticity, or eccentricity of about 0.7 – a 70% deviation from a circular path.

Our simulations tell us that this kind of orbit is almost precisely what you’d expect in about 5-10% of systems where strong dynamical cooling has taken place (yes, I’m patting myself on the back, along with congratulating my colleagues).

The new observations also reveal possible evidence for signs of another planet in the system that may be ‘slicing’ through this outer dusty hoop of material – it could be a candidate for the world that helped push Fomalhaut b to this orbit. As for Fomalhaut b itself, its mass is unknown, it could be anything between the size of tiny Pluto and Jupiter. It could also be surrounded by a disk or ring of its own, enhancing its apparent brightness.

Time will tell what’s really going on in this system, but it’s turning out to be a wonderful testbed for many ideas.

Caleb A. Scharf About the Author: Caleb Scharf is the director of Columbia University's multidisciplinary Astrobiology Center. He has worked in the fields of observational cosmology, X-ray astronomy, and more recently exoplanetary science. His latest book is 'Gravity's Engines: How Bubble-Blowing Black Holes Rule Galaxies, Stars, and Life in the Cosmos', and he is working on 'The Copernicus Complex' (both from Scientific American / Farrar, Straus and Giroux.) Follow on Twitter @caleb_scharf.

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.





Rights & Permissions

Comments 2 Comments

Add Comment
  1. 1. vinodkumarsehgal 6:48 am 01/10/2013

    Does it implies that formalhaut b was thrown at such a large ( 4-5 times the distance between Sun and Neptune) orbit due to colliding and interaction with some other planets of Formalhaut. It implies there should be many planets of Formalhaut. But article states that there could be one planet at the outer end of dusty hoot encircling Formalhaut. Was interaction with one planet only sufficient to place Formalhaut b at quite large orbit?

    Link to this
  2. 2. Postman1 1:45 pm 01/10/2013

    It is always pleasing to see science done properly. Observation, followed by theory and projection, followed by observation to confirm or rebut. Good Job! Congrats to your team.
    Would the perihelion of Fomalhaut B’s orbit be near the habitable zone? Would it still allow for the formation of Earth size rocky planets closer in? What are the chances of imaging smaller planets at this distance?

    Link to this

Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.

More from Scientific American

Scientific American MIND iPad

Give a Gift & Get a Gift - Free!

Give a 1 year subscription as low as $14.99

Subscribe Now >>

X

Email this Article

X