ADVERTISEMENT
  About the SA Blog Network













History of Geology

History of Geology


What rocks tell and how we came to understand it
History of Geology Home

June 6, 1944: The Geology of D-Day

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.


Email   PrintPrint



Into the Jaws of Death, by Robert F. Sargent (1944), image in public domain

June 6, 1944 – in planning for D-Day – also geology was considered, as aerial photographs of the shores of Normandy were studied to find suitable landing sites for the invasion.

The confluence of larger rivers with the English Channel between the harbors of Le Havre and Cherbourg created sandy shorelines were a landing with amphibious vehicles was possible. In January 1944 British divers risked their lives to collect samples from selected sites; geologists had to determine if the sandy shores could in fact support the heavy equipment and modified tanks needed to overrun the local German coastal fortifications.

44 years later, June 1988, Earle F. Mc Bride and M. Dane Picard, geologists and passionate sand collectors, collected some sand from one of the most contested landing sites – “Omaha Beach“. Studying the sand at first they didn´t find something unusual: the sand reflects the catchment area of the rivers and the marine environment – and is composed of grains of quartz, feldspar, limestone and fragmented shells. However the geologists found also magnetic grains and small spheres of iron and glass, realizing that those are particles generated from the battles during D-Day: fragments of the metallic shells and quartz sand melted by the heat of explosions.

In September 2013 artists Andy Moss and Jamie Wardley, with the help of many volunteers, used the same sand to create a memorial to the fallen soldiers.

The landing of the infantry at D-Day was accompanied by a bombardment to create a breach in the coastal artillery. One of the most strategic important locations was Pointe du Hoc, a rocky peninsula overlooking the Omaha Beach sector, supposedly fortified with heavy artillery.
The scars left there by the  bombs and grenades are still visible today. In 2006 geographers Joseph Hupy and Randy Schaetzel introduced the term “bombturbation to describe this modern trace fossil.

Also the geology of the inland proved to be of strategic importance. The Calvados plateau, located northwest of the city of Caen, is formed by limestone of Jurassic age covered by a layer of loess deposited there during the last Ice Age. This flat and dry terrain was an ideal surface to build there the airfields to ensure the fast transport of troops by the British air force. After the successful invasion of Normandy, the military geologists had to identify suitable rocks for buildings and construction works. New boreholes were drilled to get to the local aquifers and provide the ever growing number of soldiers with enough drinking water.

Geology didn´t play only a role in the past. Maybe the tiny metallic and glass particles in the sand and the bomb craters in the ground will survive some centuries or millennia before disappearing – the fragments worn away by the incessant motions of the waves and tides, the craters filled with new sediments, maybe some will even become part of the geological record -  the rocks as silent testimonies of human warfare…

David Bressan About the Author: Freelance geologist dealing with quaternary outcrops interested in the history and the development of geological concepts through time. Follow on Twitter @David_Bressan.

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.





Rights & Permissions

Comments 2 Comments

Add Comment
  1. 1. dschlenoff 2:15 pm 06/6/2014

    Interesting to find out that modern battles leave a tell-tale signature in sand–the material seems ephemeral but it’s really just its shape, not its physical and chemical composition that shifts around.

    Link to this
  2. 2. JVieira 11:43 pm 06/6/2014

    Second paragraph, first sentence, “where” should have been used instead of “were”, in my opinion.

    Link to this

Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.

More from Scientific American

Scientific American Dinosaurs

Get Total Access to our Digital Anthology

1,200 Articles

Order Now - Just $39! >

X

Email this Article

X