ADVERTISEMENT
  About the SA Blog Network













History of Geology

History of Geology


What rocks tell and how we came to understand it
History of Geology Home

Large Igneous Provinces and Mass Extinctions

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.


Email   PrintPrint



The Permian-Triassic boundary (251 million years ago) is characterized by one of the greatest mysteries in earth’s history: a mass extinction of devastating proportions. This mass extinction is the most severe incision in the history of life on this planet, estimated 75 to 90% of the marine biota disappeared; the terrestrial synapsids lost their dominant role in the Permian ecosystems to the archosaurs (which will rule the planet until the end-Cretaceous extinction) and the forests of conifers were replaced by a landscape dominated by lycopods and ferns (and maybe also fungi, as explained in a fascinating post by “The Artful Amoeba” Blog).

Fig.1. The Bletterbach gorge in the Dolomites is one of only five major tracksites worldwide dated to the Late Permian (260-251 million years). The tracks of synapsids, archosaurs and other reptiles were found in sandstone-layers deposited in the alluvial plain and channels of a river system that regularly flooded the former semi-desertic landscape. Similar reddish sediments were found all over the globe, suggesting that the Permian was largely characterized by hostile environments.

The causes of this profound environmental changes are still unknown, however one hypothesis involved the large scale volcanic eruptions that deposited the rocks of the Siberian Traps, one of the largest igneous provinces recognized on earth.

Fig.2. Main igneous provinces recognized on earth (red areas) and corresponding hotspots (yellow dots, click to enlarge map). Hotspots are stationary regions of increased igneous activity; the spatial discrepancy of these spots and lava deposits is explained by the slow movement of the tectonic plates. The radiometric ages of some of the igneous provinces correlate with major mass extinction events during earth’s history, as shown by the number of families recognized in the geological record (data after SEPKOSKI).

Large Igneous Provinces (or “LIPs”) are deposits of igneous rocks with impressive dimensions, some cover thousands of square kilometers and are hundred of meters thick. Every LIP is connected to a hotspot – stationary regions where hot plumes of material are upwelling in the mantle of earth. The energy of the plume causes partial melting of the uppermost parts of the mantle and the crust and provides so the quantities of magma needed for the superficial eruptions. LIPs formation occurs apparently as sudden as mass extinctions and are huge events releasing gigantic amounts of lava, ashes and gases into the atmosphere in geological short periods (only some million years). These gases and aerosols can affect the climate of earth – this would explain the effects on terrestrial ecosystems – and modify the chemistry of the oceans – this would explain the disastrous effects on marine ecosystems.
The dates of mass extinctions in part coincide also with the radiometric ages achieved from the volcanic rocks of the LIPs.

However there is a problem with the supposed age of the Permian-Triassic extinction and the age of the Siberian Traps. Research published in 2008 by SAHNEY & BENTON suggested that the extinction at the end of the Permian was not a single and unique event, but a succession of minor events dated to approximately 272, 262 and 250 million years ago. During this time interval also the rate of diversification of the surviving species into new species was reduced.
The formation of the Siberian Traps is well dated to approximately 250 million years ago and apparently the volcanic eruptions happened too late to explain the earlier onset of the mass extinction. The new research by SOBOLEV et al. 2011 proposes now a possibly mechanism that could explain at least some of this temporal discrepancy.
Studying the petrological composition of samples of the Siberian basalt and grains of the mineral Olivine the researchers suggest that the source rock of the magma and lava was not only the melted continental crust of the Eurasian plate, but also mantle material from the plume contaminated with ancient oceanic crust. Continental crust and ocean crust differ significantly in chemical composition and display also different physical properties; one of the most important is the relative density. Continental crust is composed of rocks with a lower density when compared to oceanic crust, the heavy oceanic crusts therefore tends to sink in the mantle of earth, where it is melted and becomes recycled into a new plume.
The contaminated plume of the Jan Mayen hotspot that formed the Siberian Traps was more dense and heavier than clean mantle material, therefore it ascended slowly and remained blocked under the continental Eurasian crust. Trough fractures and magmatic conduits in the overlying crust gases like carbon dioxide, methane and other volatiles were however slowly outgassing over hundred and thousands of years from the plume and changing the composition of earth’s atmosphere.
The plume finally melted the base of the crust, initiating the main phase of volcanic eruptions that produced the Siberian Traps and concluded the Permian-Triassic mass extinction.

References:

COURTILLOT, V.E. (1990): A volcanic eruption? Scientific American Vol.263: 85-92
FRÖBISCH (2008): Global Taxonomic Diversity of Anomodonts (Tetrapoda, Therapsida) and the Terrestrial Rock Record Across the Permian-Triassic Boundary. PLoS ONE 3(11)
SAHNEY & BENTON (2008): Recovery from the most profound mass extinction of all time. Proc. R. Soc. B (2008) 275, 759-765
SOBOLEV, S.V.; SOBOLEV, A.V.; KUZMIN, D.V.; KRIVOLUTSKAYA, N.A.; PETRUNIN, A.G.; ARNDT, N.T.; RADKO, V.A. & VASILIEV, Y.R. (2011): Linking mantle plumes, large igneous provinces and environmental catastrophes. Nature Vol.477: 312-316

David Bressan About the Author: Freelance geologist dealing with quaternary outcrops interested in the history and the development of geological concepts through time. Follow on Twitter @David_Bressan.

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.





Rights & Permissions

Comments 8 Comments

Add Comment
  1. 1. wstarr 1:32 pm 09/16/2011

    You should have someone edit this before you put it on the website. I can tell English is not your first language.

    Link to this
  2. 2. jtdwyer 2:10 pm 09/16/2011

    I found two:
    “The formation of the Siberian Traps is well dated to approximately 250 million years ago and apparently the volcanic eruptions happened to late to[o] explain the earlier onset of the mass extinction.”
    “The contaminated plume of the Jan Mayen hotspot that formed the Siberian Traps was more dense and heavier [then-than] clean mantle material…”

    Link to this
  3. 3. jtdwyer 2:12 pm 09/16/2011

    Sorry – I make similar errors. The first should have been: “…happened [to-too] late to explain…”.

    Link to this
  4. 4. jtdwyer 2:36 pm 09/16/2011

    Fig. 2 is an interesting map and chart.

    I’m just a innocent bystander, but while the Yellowstone cauldron is formed by a hotspot that has erupted several times, leaving a trail of cauldrons as the crust moved accross it, as I understand, the Siberian traps and Deccan traps have only erupted once – apparently during their initial formation. Also, the Siberian and Deccan traps released truly enormous amounts of lava compared to Yellowstone, for example.

    Wiki says the Deccan Traps formed between 60 and 68 million years ago, quite coincidental with what was almost certainly the Yucatan meteor strike that produced the extinction of the dinosaurs 65 Mya. I forget the proper terminology, but the suggestion that the Yucatan strike might have produced the Deccan traps by reciprocal impact effects, I think, has been dismissed because they are not located in opposing hemispheres.

    However, I have to wonder whether an enormous impact seismic force wave might be reflected off of the iron core and emerge short of the opposite hemisphere?

    If that were the case, could there have been an undetected enormous meteor strike, perhaps even in the ocean, that preceded the formation of the Siberian traps?

    Just some highly speculative food for thought…

    Link to this
  5. 5. David_Bressan 3:37 pm 09/17/2011

    Yes, there is a hypothesis that links various flood basalts to impacts, even the Siberian Traps to a crater near Australia.

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2004/05/040514025854.htm

    The crater-interpretation of the feature of Australia is however still discussed (it was found by geophysical methods, not as morphology on the surface). But it is not impossible that new carters will be discovered in the future, our knowledge of the oceanic crust is still poor.

    The main problem in to find the spatial (the crater should be on the opposite hemisphere) and especially the temporal connection – best standard radiometric and paleontological methods provide data with an error of an approximately 100.000 to 10.000 years, still not enough to pinpoint exact a connection of igneous deposits to specific craters.

    http://www.mantleplumes.org/WebDocuments/Antip_hot.pdf

    However I would criticise on this idea that an impact should only weaken the crust, not cause a stationary plume (as we today can observe with geophysical methods) that lasts for million of years (and explains the long-lasting volcanic activity).

    P.S: Thanks to[o]- i promise I will work on the grammer-trouble.

    Link to this
  6. 6. voroslaszlo 9:40 am 09/18/2013

    I honestly doubt that Jan Mayen is connected to Siberian traps.
    Usually as continents move a very obvious track is developing. Actually all of large igneous province can be attached to a hotspot by recognizing these tracks.
    For example the Deccan trap formed around the Reunion hot spot. Even the googlemaps shows its trac completly from Reunion to India via Maldives. The situation is quite the same with the Siberian Traps. Everybody can easily spot the track of this province’s hotspot. I have to say there is no any track to Jan Mayen. But a very definite track can be seen to HAWAII.
    The first part of this track can be found on Asian mainland. It consists of a chain of eroded but visible mountains.
    https://maps.google.com/?ll=61.564574,148.359375&spn=34.924591,79.013672&t=h&z=4
    See that grey line from the end of Lena river. It leads to the shore of Ohotsk Sea. It crosses Kamchatka and enters to the Pacific where the Aleutian arc begins.
    It does not follow the arc but keeps to south then turns to east at Midways then arrive to Hawaii. Which is the most active hot spot of the Earth according to the fact that Siberian traps was the most voluminous LIP in the same planet.
    By the way the isotopic compounds in hawaii magma is very close to Siberian.
    So please forget linking Jan Mayen to Siberian traps, there is no evidence for any kind of connection between the two.

    Link to this
  7. 7. voroslaszlo 9:42 am 09/18/2013

    and sorry about my bad english.

    Link to this
  8. 8. voroslaszlo 9:44 am 09/18/2013

    Dear David, my previous comment was adressed to you but I forget to link that to yours. Sorry.

    Link to this

Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.

More from Scientific American

Scientific American Back To School

Back to School Sale!

12 Digital Issues + 4 Years of Archive Access just $19.99

Order Now >

X

Email this Article

X