ADVERTISEMENT
  About the SA Blog Network













Guest Blog

Guest Blog


Commentary invited by editors of Scientific American
Guest Blog HomeAboutContact

Making Computers Smarter, and Helping Deaf People, Too

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.


Email   PrintPrint



A friend of mine is very hard of hearing — not quite deaf enough to fully belong to the deaf community, but sufficiently deaf that participating in a conversation is terribly hard work for her. She does her best to put together what she can hear with what she can lip read and what she can extrapolate, and then she asks her conversational partners to repeat themselves as often as she can bear. I was shocked to hear just how exhausting and isolating it is for her.

One of the young researchers here is developing a solution that could make a big difference for people like her, as well as the fully deaf — and even for journalists. In particular, Walter Lasecki of the University of Rochester (together with his advisor Jeffrey Bigham) is creating a system to transcribe conversations in real time, with no advance planning, for a fraction of the cost of a skilled human transcriber.

Lasecki’s basic idea is to crowdsource the problem, using Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (or another service) to get six or seven people to simultaneously transcribe bits of the conversation. His software then stitches together the transcriptions using their overlaps to get a single coherent, accurate transcript. Ordinarily, transcription at real-time requires a highly skilled transcriber, who might charge $150 to $300 an hour; Lasecki’s system harnesses the ability of ordinary folks.

Lasecki pointed out that one of the big advantages of his system is that it eliminates scheduling hassles. Universities are required to provide “reasonable accommodation” for students with disabilities, which includes providing sign language interpreters. But usually, there are only a very few interpreters available, so if a student needs assistance at the last minute and hasn’t scheduled it at least 24 to 48 hours in advance, he may well be out of luck. But Lasecki’s system is always just a cell phone app away — and he aims for it cost no more than $50/hour.

Furthermore, for someone like my friend, who is hard of hearing but not quite deaf, sign language interpretation can be confusing and difficult. American sign language is truly a language, with its own syntax and grammar, not simply a transcription of English into motions. So catching some of the English and simultaneously watching the sign language interpretation requires a strange bifurcation of one’s mind.

That has also set a demanding task for Lasecki’s transcription system, because it requires that it work very, very quickly. If the system produces a transcription with a 15-second delay, a hard-of-hearing person who catches every other word can’t hold what they’ve heard in their minds and then use the transcription to fill it in, and so they’ll be forced to ignore what they hear entirely and rely fully on the transcription, and they then won’t be able to put together the words with the facial expressions and gestures. So he’s aimed to have his system produce a transcription within five seconds. He’s currently at just under four.

Lasecki came to this research through his desire to make computer interfaces smarter. In particular, computers like precisely prescribed tasks, but humans need them to be able to do things that aren’t so carefully spelled out. For example, when humans understand language, we often don’t catch every word that people say, but we fill in the missing words to create something coherent. Computers aren’t good at that kind of thing. When he started his PhD research with Jeffrey Brigham, he adopted Brigham’s approach to this issue: If humans can do this stuff so well, and computers suck at them, then let’s harness the power of people to do it! Brigham’s team has created crowdsourced systems to do all kinds of things: steer robots, identify objects, answer questions expressed in ordinary natural language, and, in this case, transcribe conversations. Many of these capabilities are especially useful for people with disabilities of one kind or another. The mobility impaired, for example, can use a steerable robot to retrieve things, and the blind can use an object identification system to tell them whether a tube contains eye drops or super glue. “I never had any exposure to these communities before grad school, and now I’m neck deep in them,” Lasecki says. “My broad interest is still in intelligent interfaces, and supporting these communities is one of the great uses of them.”

As he and I talked, I took notes, getting down perhaps three-quarters of what he said. “It’s too bad I don’t have a data plan in Germany!” Lasecki said. “I could show you the system and spare you the trouble.”

…..

This blog post originates from the official blog of the 1st Heidelberg Laureate Forum (HLF) which takes place September 22 – 27, 2013 in Heidelberg, Germany. 40 Abel, Fields, and Turing Laureates will gather to meet a select group of 200 young researchers. Julie Rehmeyer is a member of the HLF blog team. Please find all her postings on the HLF blog.

Julie Rehmeyer About the Author: Julie Rehmeyer is a freelance math and science writer who writes the Math Trek column at Science News. She also writes frequently for Discover Magazine and Wired. She studied algebraic topology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Follow on Twitter @julierehmeyer.

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.






Comments 1 Comment

Add Comment
  1. 1. karae 10:13 pm 09/25/2013

    This soumds like a good solution. I wonder if speech recognition software could go back a step in its translation capabilities, and give a readout which simply tells the syllables- consonants and vowel sounds, without sorting into words. This might be enough data to fill someone in on a conversation when partial hearing is occurring. It would take some practice, but might be worth it, since this interpretation is what the brain does normally when deducing what someone is saying in real time.

    Link to this

Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.

More from Scientific American

Scientific American Holiday Sale

Black Friday/Cyber Monday Blow-Out Sale

Enter code:
HOLIDAY 2014
at checkout

Get 20% off now! >

X

Email this Article

X