Commentary invited by editors of Scientific American

# The Chameleon of Quantum Culture: Wave-Particle Duality

Recently, it was reported that an experiment was done to prove that light(or photons) can act as both a wave and a particle.

One central theme to quantum mechanics is wave-particle duality. This is part of the culture of quantum mechanics. Wave -particle duality is like calling something two different names but it still is the same thing. For example, we call water “water”. In Spanish, they call water “agua”. It’s the same substance but two different names. That is the same way with wave-particle duality.

This idea dates back to the days of Aristotle and Democritus. Aristotle believed that light was a disturbance in the air. Democritus believed that everything was made up of what we now call “atoms”. Later on in the 17th century, these ideas were more refined. Christiaan Huygens stated that light was composed of waves while Isaac Newton argued that light was made of particles. So is a wave so different from a particle and vice versa?

To understand Aristotle’s viewpoint, shut the light off in a room. The room is completely dark. Now, shine a flashlight. The light is disturbing or “interfering” in the dark room. The idea of interference plays a role in advanced studies of quantum mechanics . Interference is used to study ideas such as superposition and entanglement.

Young's double slit experiment - wave particle duality, by Mathematica

Democritus’ idea was basically like building a lego figure. Just like building something out of legos, atoms. are part of something bigger. A particle is just that-a “part” of something. Webster’s dictionary defines a particle as “a basic unit of energy or matter”. It also defines a wave as “a form of motion”.

So we can see that a particle basically refers to matter and a wave basically refers to a type of energy. This concept may sound familiar. This is called “the conservation of mass and energy”. To “conserve” something means to “save something” In the law of the conservation of mass and energy; mass and energy are not created or destroyed. This means that they change form from one to the other. Mass changes to energy and energy changes to mass. A good example that can help us understand this is eating. We eat food or mass and this mass becomes energy for us to use. Basically, this demonstrates that wave-particle duality is like a chameleon in the quantum mechanic culture. The creature changes form but is still the same thing. Einstein”s equation, E=m*c2, demonstrates the relative relationship between mass and energy.

Ironically , the mass of a subatomic particle is actually measured by this equation as well. If we want to know the wave nature of the particle , we measure the energy. If we want to know the particle nature of the wave, we measure the mass.

Another way of looking at wave-particle duality is the following. Suppose we have a group of waves sealed in a quantum envelop. This is what is called a wave packet. These waves have been “confined” to a certain space. This group of waves would also be considered a particle.

The wave packet is also a quantity or “quantum”. Wave packets are an useful tool to help us study quantum confinement, potential wells, and entanglement. These concepts are subjects for future articles.

One thing to consider: If a photon can exist in two states; a particle and a wave then this could be the basis for a qubit . A qubit is a two state quantum mechanical system. For a photon to exist as both a wave and a particle would be like water existing as a solid and liquid at the same time. Temperature is responsible for the existence of a solid and liquid at the same time. If this is true for water, then it is possible that temperature is responsible for the existence of a two-state quantum mechanical system(the qubit). Am I saying that temperature could alter the photon being a wave and particle at the same time? The answer is yes! Temperature could be what is known as a “hidden variable”. A hidden variable is something that is an external factor that influences the system. Think about it! We (as individuals) are a biological system. When we get hot or cold, we feel or act in different ways. The same happens when temperature influences atoms. They either speed up or slow down. This also touches on another subject that is later for discussion: ultracold atoms.

Wave-particle duality also finds it way in the applications of electron microscopy and neutron diffraction. In electron microscopy, waves associated with the electron are used to examine objects. Neutron diffraction basically does the same thing as electron microscopy. Instead of electrons, neutron diffraction uses neutrons.

About the Author: Joel Taylor grew up in Siskiyou County, California. He attended Yreka High School in Yreka, California. After that, he attended College of the Siskiyous in Weed, California and then transferred to Southern Oregon University in Ashland, Oregon where he graduated with a Bachelor's of Science in Physics. Since then, he has had his own tutoring and research company. He has also worked at the Maryland Science Center in Baltimore, Maryland. Joel is also a member of the American Physical Society and American Institute of Physics. Follow on Twitter @Joel_a_taylor.

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

 Previous: The Battle of the Prenatal Tests MoreGuest Blog Next: Why Are People So Interested in the DSM-5?

1. 1. gmperkins 4:19 pm 12/6/2012

Explaining or understanding wave-particle duality is the crux problem in physics, IMO. I am inclined to think that the wave and particle models are simplifications of what is actually a higher dimensional construct. Something that is clearly difficult for us to conceptualize.

2. 2. ottokrog 7:56 am 12/8/2012

This is a very interesting subject.

My idea is that the wave function collapse, is misinterpreted as a particle. The original standard model predicted that there is no mass. Peter Higgs explained mass mathematically through what later became the Higgs Boson. The Higgs Boson was found this summer, but it is still uncertain, whether it has the properties necessary to confirm the standrad model fully, and even if it does, then it still does not fit into relativity.

I have a theory that could explain a lot of mysteries, but definitely not them all. The basis of my theory is to assume the nucleus of the atom as a standing wave, and assume that mass does not exist. Then energy would flow from minus energy (antimatter) to plus energy (matter.) The antimatter existing in parallel universes, therefore no annihilation. The end result would be an average of zero energy. The universe is a hologram of electromagnetism (waves) flowing from plus energy to minus energy in space and time.

http://www.crestroy.com

3. 3. jack.123 10:52 pm 12/14/2012

The Higgs bosom has not yet been found.Some data that points in that direction has been seen.Much more research needs to be done to confirm that what has been seen in the data is in fact Higgs.It may years maybe decades before a final answer is given.For now to many questions remain to be sure this is what it is.We may be just seeing something new altogether.As for duality of photons we may be looking at 2 different aspects of energy/mass.When we see a particle we are seeing an interaction of the particle with energy/mass.When we see wave function we are seeing the interaction of the wave with space-time,not the same thing,this is why you can’t do both at the same time.So a photon is both a wave and a particle until an interaction has occured.

4. 4. jack.123 10:54 pm 12/14/2012

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More »

•
• ## Latest Headlines on ScientificAmerican.com

• Video of the Week
Hip Hop Evolutionary Tales
• Image of the Week
•