About the SA Blog Network

Guest Blog

Guest Blog

Commentary invited by editors of Scientific American
Guest Blog HomeAboutContact

The Power of Music: Mind Control by Rhythmic Sound

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

Email   PrintPrint

New Orleans, October 16, 2012 – You walk into a bar and music is thumping. All heads are bobbing and feet tapping in synchrony. Somehow the rhythmic sound grabs control of the brains of everyone in the room forcing them to operate simultaneously and perform the same behaviors in synchrony. How is this possible? Is this unconscious mind control by rhythmic sound only driving our bodily motions, or could it be affecting deeper mental processes?

The mystery runs deeper than previously thought, according to psychologist Annett Schirmer reporting new findings today at the Society for Neuroscience meeting in New Orleans. Rhythmic sound “not only coordinates the behavior of people in a group, it also coordinates their thinking—the mental processes of individuals in the group become synchronized.”

This finding extends the well-known power of music to tap into brain circuits controlling emotion and movement, to actually control the brain circuitry of sensory perception. This discovery helps explain how drums unite tribes in ceremony, why armies march to bugle and drum into battle, why worship and ceremonies are infused by song, why speech is rhythmic, punctuated by rhythms of emphasis on particular syllables and words, and perhaps why we dance.

Schirmer and her graduate student Nicolas Escoffier from the University of Singapore first tested subjects by flashing a series of images on a video monitor and asked them to quickly identify when an image was flipped upside down. While participants focused on this task, a synthetic drumbeat gently tapped out a simple four-beat rhythm in the background, syncopated by skipping the fourth beat of each measure.

The results showed that when the image was flashed on that missed beat, the subjects identified the inverted image much faster than when the image was flashed at times out of synch with the beat or when the images were presented in silence. Somehow, the brain’s decision making was accelerated by the external auditory rhythm and heightened at precise points in synchrony with the beat. Since the power of rhythm in boosting cognitive performance was evident on the missing beat when no sound was presented, the effect could not have had anything to do with the sound of the drumbeat acting as a stimulus. Mental processing must have fallen into a rhythm of heightened expectation and superior performance on the anticipated beat.

Next the researchers attached electrodes to the scalp of such subjects to determine if the brain’s electrical activity was somehow affected by the rhythm of the sound. The EEG recording detects the combined electrical activity of thousands of neurons working together in the cerebral cortex. Just like the roar of a crowd at a baseball game, waves of electrical activity in the brain are generated when individual neurons in the cerebral cortex are combined in action. The EEG recordings showed that the waves of brain activity (alpha and beta waves) became synchronized around the auditory rhythm. That is, the ongoing oscillations of brain waves became phase shifted so that the peak of the wave always occurred at a precise point relative to the next beat in the drum rhythm. Rhythmic sound synchronizes brain waves.

The brain wave recordings also revealed a more surprising effect of rhythmic sound on brain function. Any sensory stimulus, such as seeing a picture or hearing a sound, will generate a brief brain wave in the region of cerebral cortex where such information is received and processed, much like the crack of a bat at home plate causes an eruption of cheers in a stadium. The researchers found that the sensory-evoked brain wave measured at the back of the skull over the region where vision is processed, peak each time the image was presented, but when the image was presented simultaneously with the missing drumbeat, the electrical response evoked by the picture was bigger than when the image was presented out of rhythm or flashed on the screen in silence. These visual circuits are more responsive when the image appears in synch with the auditory rhythm.

This region of the brain processes the earliest steps in vision, the circuits that detect visual input. This means that our perception of the external world entering our mind through our eyes is affected by the rhythm of what we hear. Something seen at a point precisely in beat with an auditory rhythm is more likely to be perceived than if it appears out of synch with the rhythm. This gating of visual input by auditory rhythm does not require a prolonged meditation on the rhythm to cause the person to enter into some sort of a trance-like state; the effects are nearly instantaneous. “Within a few measures of music your brain waves start to get in synch with the rhythm,” Schirmer says.

Steven Pinker has said that music is “auditory cheesecake,” with no particular advantage in the evolution of our species. Schirmer feels their new results do not support that view. “Rhythm facilitates our interpersonal interactions in term of not only how we move, but how we talk and think,” she concludes. “Rhythm facilitates people interacting by synchronizing brain waves and boosting performance of perception of what the other person is saying and doing at a particular point in time.” Rhythm, whether the lyrics to a song or the meter of a poem facilitates language processing, she concludes, and she is now undertaking new experiments to further test this idea. “When people move in synchrony they are more likely to perceive the world in synchrony, so that would facilitate their ability to interact.”

R. Douglas Fields About the Author: An internationally recognized authority on neuron-glia interactions, brain development, and the cellular mechanisms of memory, Douglas Fields serves on the editorial board of several neuroscience journals and is the author of over 150 articles and the book The Other Brain.

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

Comments 11 Comments

Add Comment
  1. 1. julianpenrod 8:06 pm 10/19/2012

    And, so, all those who, decades ago, warned that heavy beat music, from boogie woogie to rock ‘n’ roll, have been vindicated. Their concerns about the music affecting the malleable, adversely affecting many children, have been borne out.
    Unfortunately, it may be too late.
    As is so often the case in this craven civilization, the truth that can damage the foul machinations of the New World Order is revealed, but only long after the horse has bolted!
    Now, a majority of the population have some degree of infestation with uncontrollable programming by heavy beat music. For years, proponents of this brainwashing mockingly played the film of the young man in an evangelist church service denouncing “the beat, the beat, the beat”. “Music can’t do anything to you”, NWO shills and quislings lied, “Heavy beat jusic has absolutely no effect!” Now, decades later, they’re laughing in your face saying, “You were stupid enough to believe the lies, so you deserve the eternal war and universal enslavement that’s to come! Just like you deserve trusting the lie that vaccines don’t cause autism!”

    Link to this
  2. 2. gerald_murray 12:40 am 10/20/2012

    Music could be one reason we beat all other hominids.

    Link to this
  3. 3. lairdl 12:45 am 10/20/2012

    Religion has been doing this for centuries. Even the cadence of the preachers speaking changes as the service proceeds, from a calm friendly “beat” to a frantic summation and interspersed with songs.
    Songs that start out with a calm friendly “beat”…you know the rest.
    Ever hear of whipping into a frenzy? The only reason people go to church…mind meld.

    Link to this
  4. 4. R. Douglas Fields 10:55 am 10/20/2012

    In another presentation at the Neuroscience meeting sleep researcher Giulio Tononi spoke about research modifying brainwaves during sleep to affect consolidation of memory and treat certain psychiatric disorders such as chronic depression. To modify brainwaves they used rhythmic sound during sleep.

    Link to this
  5. 5. jtdwyer 12:53 pm 10/20/2012

    So rhythmic music produces communal thought synchronicity – as tribal cultures have practiced for millennea?

    Link to this
  6. 6. R. Douglas Fields 9:49 am 10/21/2012

    Reply to gerald_murray, You are probably right about the advantage to humans, but what about birds, crickets, frogs? One wonders what animal studies could illuminate about the connection between rhythmic sound and perception.

    Link to this
  7. 7. greenhome123 12:43 pm 10/23/2012

    I would like to see more brain studies on people with synesthesia. That is where certain people visualize different colors and shapes in their head when they hear certain notes or chords.

    Link to this
  8. 8. R. Douglas Fields 4:00 pm 10/24/2012

    If you are interested in hearing the actual rhythmic sound used in these experiments, you can hear it here:

    For technical reasons it couldn’t be posted in the article here.

    Link to this
  9. 9. OlgatheGreat 5:13 pm 10/25/2012

    It seems kind of obvious that input is more likely to be registered if there are more neurons firing silmantaneously. My neuro 101 course told me that a neuron is more likely to fire if the charge tit’s receiving is strong or comes from multiple sources silmantaneously.

    Link to this
  10. 10. schirmer 3:39 am 10/26/2012

    Hi Olgathe, what you say is correct. The point of our work was that there was no actual physical stimulus to produce the increase in synchronous firing. The input (ie image) was the same in the on- and off-beat conditions. Processing facilitation for the on-beat condition was achieved simply by the rhythmic sequence before the “silent” beat.

    Link to this
  11. 11. LeroyT 6:49 pm 10/29/2012

    I’d love to see how rhythm affects people who have no rhythm. My son can’t clap 4 times in a row. He also doesn’t join the crowd, go with the flow, etc. He is very much an individual. Is he ‘immune’ to the effects of rhythm?

    Link to this

Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a member to submit a comment.

More from Scientific American

Email this Article