ADVERTISEMENT
  About the SA Blog Network













Extinction Countdown

Extinction Countdown


News and research about endangered species from around the world
Extinction Countdown Home

How Did Zebras Give 2 Polar Bears Herpes?

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.


Email   PrintPrint



When a polar bear suddenly takes ill and dies, the natural inclination is not to suspect zebras as the cause. But according to research published August 16 in Current Biology, that’s what happened at Wuppertal Zoo in Germany in 2010.

The strange saga started on June 8, 2010, when Jerka, a 20-year-old female polar bear, started experiencing epilepsy-like seizures and foaming at the mouth. She died eight days later. A second bear, 16-year-old Lars, also suffered the same symptoms, but he was treated with antiseizure medications and survived.

A necropsy performed on Jerka revealed that she was suffering from encephalitis, a swelling of the brain that can be caused by viral infections. A team of scientists from Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research Berlin (IZW), the University of Berlin, the University of Sydney and Wuppertal Zoo set out to find exactly what virus could have been the cause.

The result was shocking: Jerka’s killer was a recombinant of two equine herpes viruses (EHV9 and EHV1) normally found in zebras. Specifically, the EHV9 virus transferred the portion of its DNA that causes neurological diseases into the EHV1 virus, which typically only triggers respiratory distress.

Jerka wasn’t the only polar bear infected. Tests on Lars and nine additional Wuppertal polar bears, plus one that died in 2006, revealed that they all carried the virus as well.

The researchers don’t know when the recombination of the viruses occurred. Perhaps more important, they have yet to figure out how and when the virus could have jumped from the zoo’s zebras to its polar bears. Wuppertal’s enclosures for the two species are 68 meters apart, so the animals never came into direct contact. They do not share the same zookeepers, so transmission by humans seems unlikely. The authors theorize that mice or rats could have transmitted the virus from one enclosure to the other.

“These viruses do not seem to respect species boundaries and, in fact, we don’t really know whether they have any,” co-author Klaus Osterrieder, a professor of veterinary medicine at the University of Berlin, said in a prepared release. “One conundrum is that these viruses are not particularly stable in the environment, so it is important to figure out how they move between species.”

The authors warn that zoos should be on the watch for disease outbreaks potentially caused by bringing together animals from different parts of the world and putting them in relatively confined spaces. As lead author Alex Greenwood, professor of virology at IZW, told BBC News, “One of the missions of zoos is conservation of animals, and species-jumping viruses like the one in this study suggest that mission can be threatened if they are undetected.”

Photo: Lars, the polar bear that survived the equine herpes virus at Wuppertal Zoo, courtesy of Wuppertal Zoo/Barbarar Scheer

John R. Platt About the Author: Twice a week, John Platt shines a light on endangered species from all over the globe, exploring not just why they are dying out but also what's being done to rescue them from oblivion. Follow on Twitter @johnrplatt.

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.





Rights & Permissions

Comments 1 Comment

Add Comment
  1. 1. Acoyauh2 4:02 pm 08/28/2012

    It’s a zoo. Transmission by humans is NOT unlikely. Even if they don’t share zookeepers, do the zebras’ and the bears’ keepers share restrooms? Break rooms? Back-aisles to the enclosures? You get the point, right?
    The article reminds us yet again of the risks of new and recombined diseases as we intrude into diverse environments and transport ‘stuff’ – form debris to whole species – all around the world.
    Bugs aren’t done with us – oh, no, they’ve just started ;)

    Link to this

Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.

More from Scientific American

Scientific American Holiday Sale

Give a Gift &
Get a Gift - Free!

Give a 1 year subscription as low as $14.99

Subscribe Now! >

X

Email this Article

X