ADVERTISEMENT
  About the SA Blog Network













Extinction Countdown

Extinction Countdown


News and research about endangered species from around the world
Extinction Countdown Home

Disease-Carrying Virile American Crayfish Invade U.K. Rivers

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.


Email   PrintPrint



virile crayfishU.S. crayfish and their British cousins do not get along. First the U.K. was invaded by the American signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus) carrying the deadly crayfish plague, which has killed 95 percent of Britain’s native white-clawed crayfish (Austropotamobius pallipes) over the past 20 years. Now another invasive crayfish species—the virile crayfish (Orconectes virilis), native to the U.S. and Canada—is starting to spread in the rivers around East London. The species also carries crayfish plague.

The disease, caused by a water mold (Aphanomyces astaci), is a pretty nasty killer. It literally eats a crayfish from the inside out, leaving nothing but an empty shell behind. Death occurs within weeks of infection.

Virile crayfish were first spotted in East London’s waterways in 2004, probably after being dumped into a pond from a home aquarium. Since then, they have colonized 17 kilometers of the River Lee and surrounding waterways. River Lee has no native white-clawed crayfish left—they were all wiped out by the signal crayfish invasion in the 1980s.

Hoping to find out how quickly the virile crayfish will spread to other areas, the U.K.’s Environment Agency (EA) attached tiny radio transmitters to several virile crayfish in the river. The news wasn’t good: According to preliminary results, the crayfish are moving 500 meters per month, far faster than the rate of the signal crayfish invasion in the 1980s. Those first American invaders can now be found throughout England, Wales and Scotland.

“By tracking the colonization of the River Lee by virile crayfish, we will better understand how this species impacts the environment and our native wildlife,” EA environmental monitoring officer Adam Ellis said in a prepared statement. “However, one of the most important ways to protect our wildlife is to stop the spread of non-native invasive species. We’re appealing to the public not to release unwanted pets into the wild.”

Signal and virile crayfish were imported to the U.K. as food, bait and pets. The two species are larger than native white-clawed crayfish and are more prodigious hunters. They also damage river banks by burrowing into them to lay eggs. Both species enjoy immunity to crayfish plague that the U.K. species does not share.

Several other invasive crayfish live in British waters. The Turkish narrow-clawed crayfish (Astacus leptodactylus) lives in a few areas, but it is not immune to crayfish plague. The red swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) from northern Mexico and the southern U.S. carries the killer plague, eats both water plants and small animals, and can turn lakes into muddy pits devoid of life.

According to EA, invasive species cost the U.K. economy at least $2.6 billion in damage annually.

Photo courtesy of Environment Agency

John R. Platt About the Author: Twice a week, John Platt shines a light on endangered species from all over the globe, exploring not just why they are dying out but also what's being done to rescue them from oblivion. Follow on Twitter @johnrplatt.

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.





Rights & Permissions

Comments 3 Comments

Add Comment
  1. 1. Bonzo666 8:03 pm 01/11/2012

    So whose responsible I don’t think they swam there

    Link to this
  2. 2. brock2118 11:14 pm 01/11/2012

    This has to be global warming. Soon it will be warm enough there for poison ivy to flourish. I propose we should send them some seeds. The foliage is a beautiful crimson in the autumn.

    Link to this
  3. 3. John R. Platt in reply to John R. Platt 9:03 am 01/12/2012

    As it says in the article, they were probably released pets. After that, they did swim.

    Link to this

Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.

More from Scientific American

Scientific American Holiday Sale

Give a Gift &
Get a Gift - Free!

Give a 1 year subscription as low as $14.99

Subscribe Now! >

X

Email this Article

X