About the SA Blog Network

Extinction Countdown

Extinction Countdown

News and research about endangered species from around the world
Extinction Countdown Home

Platypus Threatened by Climate Change

The views expressed are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

Email   PrintPrint

platypusThe thick, waterproof fur that once made the platypus (Ornithorhynchus anatinus) a valuable target for trappers may soon present another danger for the unique mammal: Australia could soon end up being too hot for the species to survive.

Platypus fur is so warm and watertight that it insulates the semiaquatic animals from virtually all heat loss—an important function, because platypus spend up to 10 hours a day in 0 degree Celsius streams and rivers. But this evolutionary advantage puts the species at a disadvantage as climate change heats things up in Australia. Research published online this week in Global Change Biology predicts that more than 30 percent of current platypus habitat will become too warm for the species by 2070.

According to the Web site Climate Change in Australia, models show a surface temperature rise of up to 5 degrees Celsius by 2070 in the Australian states of New South Wales, Queensland and Victoria, where platypus are found.

“The highly insulating fur is an asset for surviving in cooler climates but becomes a liability in warmer conditions,” co-author Jenny Davis, a lecturer and ecologist at Australia’s Monash University, told BBC News.

Davis and her team studied two centuries’ worth of platypus distribution records, which were then combined with models of rainfall and temperature. The analysis revealed that until the 1960s platypus habitat was mostly determined by the amount of rainfall an area received. After that time the animals disappeared from areas where general temperatures had risen.

Davis says this research indicates the need to maintain not just the presence of aquatic habitats, but also their current temperatures.

Platypus were hunted for the fur trade until the early 20th century, but they are now protected under Australian law. The evolutionarily unique animals are one of five egg-laying mammal species. They are also the sole living member of their genus and one of world’s only venomous mammals.

Photo courtesy of Melbourne Water via Flickr. Used under Creative Commons license

Rights & Permissions

Comments 6 Comments

Add Comment
  1. 1. Trent1492 2:21 pm 06/24/2011

    Shorter Mememine: Please ignore the content of the article.

    Link to this
  2. 2. Bill Crofut 3:33 pm 06/24/2011

    Perhaps the platypus needs to "evolve" a few additional features to add to its composite arsenal:

    Tropical Birds Return to Harvested Rainforest Areas in Brazil

    What is the evolutionary precursor of the platypus? What is the evolutionary successor of the platypus?

    Link to this
  3. 3. Postman1 4:43 pm 06/24/2011

    Bill- thanks for the link to a very good article. Also, very good questions.. I suspect the platypus will evolve and cope as it has in the past.

    Link to this
  4. 4. Le Spaz d'Argent 8:28 pm 06/24/2011

    If the platypus is going to evolve itself out of this predicament it had better get a move on. It took us glorified apes ~2,000,000 yrs to get to our current hairless condition.

    Link to this
  5. 5. sault 10:39 pm 06/24/2011

    Or it will probably go extinct because CO2 concentrations and temperatures are increasing faster than at any time in the past 50 million years. And what about all the other species going extinct that we never even had the chance to discover? What if one of them could make a cure for cancer or cheap, renewable fuels? Is even the discovery of a new species worth less than having cheap energy and gasoline?

    Link to this
  6. 6. Alan P 7:39 pm 06/29/2011

    Postman1, do you really imagine that the evolution of species happens within such a short timespan? You do realise we’re talking WITHIN the next century here, right?

    Link to this

Add a Comment
You must sign in or register as a member to submit a comment.

More from Scientific American

Email this Article